Cited by 27Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Cluster randomized trial of a mHealth intervention “ImTeCHO” to improve delivery of proven maternal, neonatal, and child care interventions through community-based Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) by enhancing their motivation and strengthening supervision in tribal areas of Gujarat, India: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Modi, Dhiren, Desai, Shrey, Dave, Kapilkumar, Shah, Shobha, Desai, Gayatri, Dholakia, Nishith, Gopalan, Ravi, Shah, Pankaj·2017·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To facilitate the delivery of proven maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) services, a new cadre of village-based frontline workers, called the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), was created in 2005 under the aegis of the National Rural Health Mission in India. Evaluations have noted that coverage of selected MNCH services to be delivered by the ASHAs is low. Reasons for low coverage are inadequate supervision and support to ASHAs apart from insufficient skills, poor quality of training, and complexity of tasks to be performed. The proposed study aims to implement and evaluate an innovative intervention based on mobile phone technology (mHealth) to improve the performance of ASHAs through better supervision and support in predominantly tribal and rural communities of Gujarat, India. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a two-arm, stratified, cluster randomized trial of 36 months in which the units of randomization will be Primary Health Centers (PHCs). There are 11 PHCs in each arm. The intervention is a newly built mobile phone application used in the public health system and evaluated in three ways: (1) mobile phone as a job aid to ASHAs to increase coverage of MNCH services; (2) mobile phone as a job aid to ASHAs and Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) to increase coverage of care among complicated cases by facilitating referrals, if indicated and home-based care; (3) web interface as a job aid for medical officers and PHC staff to improve supervision and support to the ASHA program. Participants of the study are pregnant women, mothers, infants, ASHAs, and PHC staff. Primary outcome measures are a composite index made of critical, proven MNCH services and the proportion of neonates who were visited by ASHAs at home within the first week of birth. Secondary outcomes include coverage of selected MNCH services and care sought by complicated cases. Outcomes will be measured by conducting household surveys at baseline and post-intervention which will be compared with usual practice in the control area, where the current level of services provided by the government will continue. The primary analysis will be intention to treat. DISCUSSION: This study will help answer some critical questions about the effectiveness and feasibility of implementing an mHealth solution in an area of MNCH services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India, CTRI/2015/06/005847 . Registered on 3 June 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-017-1998-0

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]WHO and UNICEF Home visits for the newborn child: a strategy to improve survival: WHO and UNICEF joint statement 2009 Geneva WHO 24809117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modi, D., Desai, S., Dave, K., Shah, S., Desai, G., Dholakia, N., Gopalan, R., & Shah, P.
Affiliations
  • Society for Education Welfare and Action Rural (IN)
  • Government of Gujarat (IN)
Corresponding author
Desai, Shrey
Venue
Trials
Published
2017-06-09
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
270-270
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2622745382
Cited by
27
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Indian Council of Medical Research (5/7/589/Gujarat/2011-RCH)
  • World Health Organization (MCA00615)
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (G-108398-0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
Accredited Social Health Activists, mobile health, mobile application, job aids, auxiliary nurse midwives, home-based neonatal care, tribal communities, rural health, National Rural Health Mission, Gujarat, service coverage, primary health centers, health worker motivation
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Maternal Health, Infant Health, Clinical Protocols, Community Health Workers, Community Health Services, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Health Services, Midwifery, Patient Care Team, Pregnancy, Research Design, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Models, Organizational, Telemedicine, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Rural Health Services, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review