Cited by 28Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesInterprofessional Education and CollaborationMedication Adherence and Compliance

A targeted interprofessional educational intervention to address therapeutic adherence of venous leg ulcer persons (TIEIVLU): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Probst, Sebastian, Allet, Lara, Depeyre, Jocelyne, Colin, Sophie, Buehrer Skinner, Monika·2019·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulcers are slow-healing wounds with a high recurrence rate of 70% and a 60% risk of becoming chronic. Signs and symptoms such as pain or exudate are not only a burden on those affected but also on the healthcare system and society in general. The estimated leg ulcer prevalence in the general population is 1%. Treatment costs for leg ulcers are estimated to be 3% of overall health expenditure. Current therapeutic approaches are multifaceted and include compression therapy, leg elevation, specific ankle-exercises and a protein diet. They require an interdisciplinary team of health care professionals. Approximately 70% of patients have a knowledge deficit with regards to therapeutic measures and have difficulties with adherence to treatment protocols. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that the treatment team provides effective patient education and support during the learning phase. However, there is little evidence and no published studies that describe and evaluate effective interdisciplinary educational interventions that target compliance/adherence to the treatment plan in patients with leg ulcers. We therefore propose to develop an evidence-based interprofessional educational intervention and evaluate its feasibility first in a pilot study and subsequently in a randomized controlled trial. METHOD/DESIGN: First, the development of an evidence-based educational intervention in collaboration with an expert panel is proposed and second, a randomized controlled feasibility study in a wound-care outpatient clinic. Eligible patients (n = 20) with leg ulcers will be randomized to receive either interdisciplinary education and usual care or only usual care, for 12 weeks. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 25. Univariate and bivariate analysis will be conducted according to the data level and distribution of the data. DISCUSSION: We will first develop an evidenced-based educational intervention and second, we will examine the feasibility of implementing this educational intervention in a realistic care context in patients with leg ulcers. The results will inform the final design of a subsequent randomized controlled trial, which will examine the effectiveness of the educational intervention. An intervention that enhances patient adherence to therapy would be beneficial to individual patients and to society as a whole. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03454698 . Registered on 6 March 2018.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-019-3333-4

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Harrisson MB Graham ID Friedberg E Lorimer K Vandevelde CS Assessing the population with leg and foot ulcers Canadian Nurse 2001 97 18 23 11865487
  2. [13]Association for the Advancement of Wound Care Association for the Advancement of Wound Care (AAWC) venous ulcer guideline 2010 25380098
  3. [15]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Varicose veins in the legs. The diagnosis and management of varicose veins 2013 25535637

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Probst, S., Allet, L., Depeyre, J., Colin, S., & Buehrer Skinner, M.
Affiliations
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
Corresponding author
Probst, Sebastian
Venue
Trials
Published
2019-04-29
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
243-243
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947416586
Cited by
28
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ebnet-Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
venous leg ulcers, medication adherence, interprofessional education, patient education, multidisciplinary care, compression therapy, wound care, chronic wounds, feasibility study
MeSH terms
Feasibility Studies, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Leg Ulcer, Patient Care Team, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Pilot Projects, Switzerland, Time Factors, Wound Healing, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review