Cited by 18Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesWound Healing and TreatmentsNursing Roles and Practices

Nurse-led patient education for persons suffering from a venous leg ulcer in outpatient’s clinics and homecare settings : a scoping review

Open access
Bobbink, Paul, Pugliese, Marie-Therese, Larkin, Philip, Probst, Sebastian·2020·Journal of Tissue Viability

Abstract

AIM OF THIS STUDY: To provide an overview of the available nurse-led individualized educational interventions, for persons with Venous Leg Ulcer (VLUs) in an outpatient or homecare settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this scoping review, a search was performed between December 2019 and January 2020. To identify sources of evidence a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science and LiSSa as well as in clinical trial registers to identify sources of evidence. All types of evidence associated with a nurse led-intervention were included. RESULTS: Fifteen sources of evidence met the inclusion criteria. Educational sessions varied in modality, content and duration. Education sessions were face to face and supported by written materiel. The content focused on compression therapy and exercises. The duration and numbers of sessions varied. The most reported health related outcomes was wound healing. CONCLUSION: This scoping review provides a broad overview of the available evidence and ongoing research for individualized nurse-led education persons with VLUs. Variability in the literature was found, which suggests that more intervention studies are needed to test and evaluate efficacy of nurse-led patient education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.08.006

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bobbink, P., Pugliese, M.-T., Larkin, P., & Probst, S.
Affiliations
  • HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Bobbink, Paul
Venue
Journal of Tissue Viability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
297-309
ISSN
  • 0268-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 0965-206X
OpenAlex
W3082961369
Cited by
18
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Tissue Viability (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
venous leg ulcers, nurse-led patient education, compression therapy, wound healing, home care, outpatient clinics, wound care education
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Care Facilities, Home Care Services, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Varicose Ulcer, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review