Cited by 43Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceInnovations in Medical Education

Targeted interventions to prevent transitioning from acute to chronic low back pain in high-risk patients: development and delivery of a pragmatic training course of psychologically informed physical therapy for the TARGET trial

Open access
Beneciuk, Jason M., George, Steven Z., Greco, Carol M., Schneider, Michael J., Wegener, Stephen T., Saper, Robert B., Delitto, Anthony·2019·Trials

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a public health concern because it is highly prevalent and the leading cause of disability worldwide. Psychologically informed physical therapy (PIPT) is a secondary prevention approach that first aims to identify individuals at high risk for transitioning to chronicity and then provides tailored treatment to reduce that risk. Training models that are feasible to implement with acceptable training quality are needed to improve scalability for widespread implementation of PIPT. This manuscript describes the PIPT training program that was developed for training physical therapists providing PIPT in the TARGET trial. METHODS: The PIPT training program was developed, tested, and modified using an iterative process. Content development consisted of stakeholder engagement, beta testing, modification of training, and confirmation of final course objectives. Methods of delivery consisted of a website that included brief online educational modules followed by a live 8-h workshop that included video-based mock case scenarios and case-based role playing. Attitudes, beliefs, and confidence in implementing PIPT principles were assessed before and immediately after training to measure training quality and impact. RESULTS: Early stakeholder engagement and beta testing indicated the need for increased emphasis on experiential learning opportunities and patient-centered communication training. Booster training varied extensively across TARGET sites with involvement of 'clinician champions' providing brief follow-up sessions identified as best practice. Favorable post-training changes in physical therapist attitudes and beliefs toward biopsychosocial treatment orientation and increased confidence in implementing PIPT principles were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PIPT training for provider participation in the TARGET trial was feasible to deliver. Course content was acceptable to physical therapists and resulted in improved beliefs and confidence in applying PIPT skills during clinical practice. Ongoing consultation and site-based continuing education were methods by which specific TARGET sites maintained or augmented PIPT skill training; however, implementing ongoing training was challenging in general. Due to the pragmatic nature of the TARGET trial, it was not possible to directly measure the effect of PIPT training on treatment fidelity, which was a limitation of our approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02647658 . Registered on 6 January 2016.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-019-3350-3

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The success of delivery of PiPT and PNE has been shown to be impacted by the PT's confidence and comfort with the program as well as the therapist having the qualities necessary to implement patient-centered care.

    “The success of delivery of PiPT and PNE has been shown to be impacted by the PT’s confidence and comfort with the program as well as the therapist having the qualities necessary to implement patient-centered care.20,28,32,35,44,52”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results section (Confidence in PIPT skill application; page unavailable) reports increased therapist confidence after training, and the Discussion (Patient-centered communication; page unavailable) says communication training appears important for integrating PIPT into practice. But the Discussion (Provider training; page unavailable) says further assessment is needed to determine whether training changed provider behavior. The paper does not show that confidence, comfort, or therapist qualities affected the success of delivering PIPT or PNE. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beneciuk, J. M., George, S. Z., Greco, C. M., Schneider, M. J., Wegener, S. T., Saper, R. B., & Delitto, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Beneciuk, Jason M.
Venue
Trials
Published
2019-05-06
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
256-256
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947090425
Cited by
43
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCS-1402-10867)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
low back pain, chronic low back pain, physiotherapy education, secondary prevention, biopsychosocial care, stakeholder engagement, online learning modules, role play, booster training, TARGET trial
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Curriculum, Education, Professional, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, United States, Low Back Pain, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Patient-Centered Care, Physical Therapy Modalities, Secondary Prevention, Chronic Pain, Acute Pain, Physical Therapists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review