Cited by 389Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Musculoskeletal physiotherapists’ use of psychological interventions: a systematic review of therapists’ perceptions and practice

Open access
Alexanders, Jenny, Anderson, Anna, Henderson, Sarah·2015·Physiotherapy

Abstract

Background Research has demonstrated that incorporating psychological interventions within physiotherapy practice has numerous potential benefits. Despite this physiotherapists have reported feeling inadequately trained to confidently use such interventions in their day-to-day practice.Objective To systematically review musculoskeletal physiotherapists' perceptions regarding the use of psychological interventions within physiotherapy practice.Data sources Eligible studies were identified through a rigorous search of AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsychINFO from January 2002 until August 2013.Study eligibility criteria Full text qualitative, quantitative and mixed methodology studies published in English language investigating musculoskeletal physiotherapists' perceptions regarding their use of psychological interventions within physiotherapy practice.Study synthesis and appraisal Included studies were appraised for risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. Meta-analysis was not possible due to study heterogeneity.Results Six studies, all with a low risk of bias, met the inclusion criteria. These studies highlighted that physiotherapists appreciate the importance of using psychological interventions within their practice, but report inadequate understanding and consequent underutilisation of these interventions.Limitations These results should be noted with some degree of caution due to various limitations associated with the included studies and with this review, including the use of a qualitative appraisal tool for mixed methodology/quantitative studies.Conclusion These findings suggest that musculoskeletal physiotherapists are aware of the potential benefits of incorporating psychological interventions within their practice but feel insufficiently trained to optimise their use of such interventions; hence highlighting a need for further research in this area and a review of physiotherapist training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physio.2014.03.008

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Allied health care professionals are aware of the benefits of incorporating psychological interventions within their practice but feel insufficiently trained to optimize their use of such interventions.

    “Although allied health care professionals (HCPs) are aware of the benefits of incorporating psychological interventions within their practice, they feel insufficiently trained to optimize their use of such interventions [91].”

    From Development and usability testing of a web-based and therapist-assisted coping skills program for managing psychosocial problems in individuals with hand and upper limb injuries: Mixed methods study (2020) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Conclusion (p. 4) says musculoskeletal physiotherapists recognise the potential benefits of psychological interventions but feel insufficiently trained to use them effectively. The citing sentence extends that finding to allied health care professionals generally, a broader group than the review studied. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinicians have a solid foundation in collecting relevant anatomic and physiologic data, but lack training in evidenced-based psychosocial profiles.

    “Clinicians have a solid foundation in collecting relevant anatomic and physiologic data, but lack training in evidenced-based psychosocial profiles (Alexanders et al., 2015;Beneciuk et al., 2021;Driver et al., 2017;Sanders et al., 2013).”

    From Beyond yellow flags: The Big‐Five personality traits and psychologically informed musculoskeletal rehabilitation. (2023) · cites this paper as Alexanders et al., 2015

    The Abstract (p. 3) reports that musculoskeletal physiotherapists felt inadequately trained to use psychological interventions, and Implications for practice (p. 15) describes a paucity of such training. The paper does not establish that clinicians have a solid foundation in collecting anatomic and physiologic data, or specifically that they lack training in evidence-based psychosocial profiles. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]Health Df. The NHS Knowledge Skills Framework and the development review process. In: NHS, editor. 2004. p. 23.
  2. [9]Heaney C, Alison G, Rostron C, Walker N. A qualitative and quantatitive investigation of the psychology content of UK physiotherapy education. Jounal of Physical Therapy Education. 2012;26(3):1-27.
  3. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2013;35(1):1-10.
  4. [22]Arvinen-Barrow M, Penny G, Hemmings B, Corr S. UK chartered physiotherapists' personal experiences in using psychological interventions with injured athletes: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2010 1//;11(1):58-66.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexanders, J., Anderson, A., & Henderson, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Alexanders, Jenny
Venue
Physiotherapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
101
Issue
2
Pages
95-102
ISSN
0031-9406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047897075
Cited by
389
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
psychological intervention, musculoskeletal physiotherapy, physiotherapists' perceptions, training needs, therapist training
MeSH terms
Humans, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Outpatients, Perception, Psychotherapy, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review