Cited by 28Connective tissue disorders researchOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Association between general joint hypermobility and knee, hip, and lumbar spine osteoarthritis by race: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Flowers, Portia P. E., Cleveland, Rebecca J., Schwartz, Todd A., Nelson, Amanda E., Kraus, Virginia B., Hillstrom, Howard J., Goode, Adam P., Hannan, Marian T. +3 more·2018·Arthritis Research & Therapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) prevalence differs by race. General joint hypermobility (GJH) may be associated with OA, but differences by race are not known. This community-based study examined the frequency of GJH and its relationship with knee, hip, and lumbar spine OA by race (African American vs. Caucasian). METHODS: Data were from the Johnston County OA project, collected 2003-2010. GJH was defined as Beighton score ≥4. OA symptoms were defined as the presence of pain, aching, or stiffness on most days separately at the knee, hip, and lower back. Radiographic OA (rOA) of the knee or hip was defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-4. Lumbar spine rOA was disc space narrowing grade ≥1 and osteophyte grade ≥2 in ≥ 1 at the same lumbar level. Lumbar spine facet rOA was present in ≥ 1 lumbar levels. Separate logistic regression models stratified by race were used to examine the association between hypermobility and rOA or OA symptoms at each joint site, adjusting for age, sex, previous joint injury, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: ). Nearly 8% of Caucasians were hypermobile vs. 5% of African-Americans (p = 0.03). Hypermobility was associated with lower back symptoms in Caucasians (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00, 2.39), but not in African-Americans (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.34, 1.72). Associations between hypermobility and other knee, hip, or lumbar spine/facet OA variables were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: General joint hypermobility was more common in Caucasians than African-Americans. Although there were no associations between hypermobility and rOA, the association between hypermobility and lower back symptoms may differ by race.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13075-018-1570-7

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a community-based study, 8% of Caucasians were hypermobile versus 5% of African Americans, a statistically significant difference.

    “From this group, 8% of Caucasians were hypermobile vs. 5% of African Americans, a statistically significant difference.[22]”

    From Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flowers, P. P. E., Cleveland, R. J., Schwartz, T. A., Nelson, A. E., Kraus, V. B., Hillstrom, H. J., Goode, A. P., Hannan, M. T., Renner, J. B., Jordan, J. M., & Golightly, Y. M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
  • Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
Corresponding author
Golightly, Yvonne M.
Venue
Arthritis Research & Therapy
Published
2018-04-18
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
76-76
ISSN
  • 1478-6354 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6362
OpenAlex
W2804369361
Cited by
28
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR071440-01A1, R01AR067743, R01AR067743-02S1)
  • NIH/NIAMS Multipurpose Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Center (P60AR30701)
  • NIH/NIAMS Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Center (P60AR064166)
  • Centers for Disease and Prevention Control / Association of Schools of Public Health (S043, S3486)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01DP006266)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
osteoarthritis, racial differences, African Americans, Caucasians, knee osteoarthritis, hip osteoarthritis, lumbar spine osteoarthritis, Beighton score, low back pain, radiographic osteoarthritis, Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project
MeSH terms
Aged, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Lumbosacral Region, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Osteoarthritis, Knee, White People, Osteoarthritis, Spine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review