Cited by 66Connective tissue disorders researchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

Lack of consensus on tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: hypermobile type and joint hypermobility syndrome

Remvig, Lars, Flycht, Lise, Christensen, Karl B., Juul‐Kristensen, Birgit·2014·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to register clinicians performance and opinion of importance of clinical tests for generalized joint hypermobility (GJH), Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type (EDS‐HT) and joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), and to reach a consensus among clinicians on criteria for diagnosing GJH, EDS‐HT and JHS. A panel of clinicians answered questions about how to perform and interpret clinical tests and rated test importance on an 11‐box scale. The questionnaire was developed on the basis of information from focus groups and the literature. Cronbach's α was used as a measure of internal consistency/consensus among the panelists. The results showed Cronbach's α on importance score of items for diagnosing GJH, EDS‐HT and JHS was 0.61, 0.79, and 0.44, respectively. Panelist‐group correlation for the three conditions varied substantially (−0.46 to 0.89, 0.03 to 0.68, and −0.07 to 0.68) indicating heterogeneity among the panelists. There was agreement on which tests to use, but performance of the tests (i.e., the specific maneuvers) varied considerably inclusive use of tests with unknown reliability. Furthermore, agreement on the diagnostic criteria varied. We conclude that the level of consensus for the importance of various items for diagnosing GJH, EDS‐HT and JHS, was below the required limit (Cronbach's α >0.90) for clinical decision‐making and diagnosing. Consensus on tests and criteria through a Delphi process could not be reached. Better descriptions of, and reliability studies on, test maneuvers and criteria sets for these conditions are needed. Subsequent intensive training and implementation of these tests and criteria, nationally as well as internationally should be established. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.a.36402

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Remvig, L., Flycht, L., Christensen, K. B., & Juul‐Kristensen, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Remvig, Lars
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-24
Volume
164
Issue
3
Pages
591-596
ISSN
  • 1552-4825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4833
OpenAlex
W1971493360
Cited by
66
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
generalized joint hypermobility, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type, joint hypermobility syndrome, diagnostic criteria, clinical tests, clinician consensus, test reliability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Expert Testimony, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Consensus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review