Cited by 12Anesthesia and Pain ManagementUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial intelligence enhanced ultrasound (AI-US) in a severe obese parturient: a case report

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial anesthesia in obese parturients can be challenging due to anatomical and physiological modifications secondary to pregnancy; this led to growing popularity of spine ultrasound in this population for easing landmark identification and procedure execution. Integration of Artificial Intelligence with ultrasound (AI-US) for image enhancement and analysis has increased clinicians' ability to localize vertebral structures in patients with challenging anatomical conformation. CASE PRESENTATION: , in which the AI-Enabled Image Recognition allowed a successful placing of an epidural catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Benefits gained from AI-US implementation are multiple: immediate recognition of anatomical structures leads to increased first-attempt success rate, making easier the process of spinal anesthesia execution compared to traditional palpation methods, reducing needle placement time for spinal anesthesia and predicting best needle direction and target structure depth in peridural anesthesia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13089-022-00283-5

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Compagnone, C., Borrini, G., Calabrese, A., Taddei, M., Bellini, V., & Bignami, E.
Affiliations
University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Calabrese, Alberto
Venue
The Ultrasound Journal
Publisher
Mattioli1885
Published
2022-08-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
34-34
ISSN
  • 2036-3176 (ISSN-L)
  • 2524-8987
OpenAlex
W4289550033
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Ultrasound Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
epidural anesthesia, epidural catheter placement, neuraxial anesthesia, image recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review