A comparative study of the effects of Aducanumab and scanning ultrasound on amyloid plaques and behavior in the APP23 mouse model of Alzheimer disease
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Aducanumab is an anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) antibody that achieved reduced amyloid pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) trials; however, it is controversial whether it also improved cognition, which has been suggested would require a sufficiently high cumulative dose of the antibody in the brain. Therapeutic ultrasound, in contrast, has only begun to be investigated in human AD clinical trials. We have previously shown that scanning ultrasound in combination with intravenously injected microbubbles (SUS), which temporarily and safely opens the blood-brain barrier (BBB), removes amyloid and restores cognition in APP23 mice. However, there has been no direct testing of how the effects of SUS compare to immunotherapy or whether a combination therapy is more effective. Methods: In a study comprising four treatment arms, we tested the efficacy of an Aducanumab analog, Adu, both in comparison to SUS, and as a combination therapy, in APP23 mice (aged 13–22 months), using sham as a control. The active place avoidance (APA) test was used to test spatial memory, and histology and ELISA were used to measure amyloid. Brain antibody levels were also determined. Results: We found that both Adu and SUS reduced the total plaque area in the hippocampus with no additive effect observed with the combination treatment (SUS + Adu). Whereas in the cortex where there was a trend towards reducing the total plaque area from either Adu or SUS, only the combination treatment yielded a statistically significant decrease in total plaque area compared to sham. Only the SUS and SUS + Adu groups included animals that had their plaque load reduced to below 1% from above 10%. There was a robust improvement in spatial memory for the SUS + Adu group only, and in this group the level of Adu, when measured 3 days post-treatment, was 5-fold higher compared to those mice that received Adu on its own. Together, these findings suggest that SUS should be considered as a treatment option for AD. Alternatively, a combination trial using Aducanumab together with ultrasound to increase brain levels of the antibody may be warranted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies
Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001 · Cited by 3,204 · see citing works
A resurrection of aducanumab for Alzheimer's disease
Schneider, L. (2020) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30480-6 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Nisbet, R. M., Van der Jeugd, A., Leinenga, G., Evans, H. T., Janowicz, P. W., & Götz, J. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx052 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shi, M., Chu, F., Zhu, F., & Zhu, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.870517 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Wang, J., Li, Z., Pan, M., Fiaz, M., Hao, Y., Yan, Y., Sun, L., & Yan, F. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114539 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Rouhi, N., Chakeri, Z., Ghorbani Nejad, B., Rahimzadegan, M., Rafi Khezri, M., Kamali, H., & Nosrati, R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37533 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leinenga, G., Koh, W. K., & Götz, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Götz, Jürgen
- Venue
- Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
- Published
- 2021-04-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-76
- ISSN
- 1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8035770
- OpenAlex
- W3142848788
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (GNT1145580)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- aducanumab, ultrasound therapy, amyloid plaques, APP23 mice, Alzheimer's disease, anti-amyloid beta antibodies, blood-brain barrier opening, microbubbles, combination therapy, spatial memory, hippocampus, amyloid-beta immunotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Transgenic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review