Cited by 409IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingSecurity and Verification in ComputingCloud Data Security Solutions

Fog computing security: A review of current applications and security solutions

Open access
Khan, Saad, Parkinson, Simon, Qin, Yongrui·2017·Journal of Cloud Computing

Abstract

Fog computing is a new paradigm that extends the Cloud platform model by providing computing resources on the edges of a network. It can be described as a cloud-like platform having similar data, computation, storage and application services, but is fundamentally different in that it is decentralized. In addition, Fog systems are capable of processing large amounts of data locally, operate on-premise, are fully portable, and can be installed on heterogeneous hardware. These features make the Fog platform highly suitable for time and location-sensitive applications. For example, Internet of Things (IoT) devices are required to quickly process a large amount of data. This wide range of functionality driven applications intensifies many security issues regarding data, virtualization, segregation, network, malware and monitoring. This paper surveys existing literature on Fog computing applications to identify common security gaps. Similar technologies like Edge computing, Cloudlets and Micro-data centres have also been included to provide a holistic review process. The majority of Fog applications are motivated by the desire for functionality and end-user requirements, while the security aspects are often ignored or considered as an afterthought. This paper also determines the impact of those security issues and possible solutions, providing future security-relevant directions to those responsible for designing, developing, and maintaining Fog systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13677-017-0090-3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, S., Parkinson, S., & Qin, Y.
Affiliations
University of Huddersfield (GB)
Corresponding author
Khan, Saad
Venue
Journal of Cloud Computing
Published
2017-08-16
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2192-113X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2747548784
Cited by
409
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 1
FWCI
27.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
fog computing, fog computing security, edge computing, cloudlets, Internet of Things, security vulnerabilities, malware, network security, data security, virtualization security, security solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review