The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environment shapes the fecal microbiome of invasive carp species
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although the common, silver, and bighead carps are native and sparsely distributed in Eurasia, these fish have become abundant and invasive in North America. An understanding of the biology of these species may provide insights into sustainable control methods. The animal-associated microbiome plays an important role in host health. Characterization of the carp microbiome and the factors that affect its composition is an important step toward understanding the biology and interrelationships between these species and their environments. RESULTS: We compared the fecal microbiomes of common, silver, and bighead carps from wild and laboratory environments using Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). The fecal bacterial communities of fish were diverse, with Shannon indices ranging from 2.3 to 4.5. The phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Fusobacteria dominated carp guts, comprising 76.7 % of total reads. Environment played a large role in shaping fecal microbial community composition, and microbiomes among captive fishes were more similar than among wild fishes. Although differences among wild fishes could be attributed to feeding preferences, diet did not strongly affect microbial community structure in laboratory-housed fishes. Comparison of wild- and lab-invasive carps revealed five shared OTUs that comprised approximately 40 % of the core fecal microbiome. CONCLUSIONS: The environment is a dominant factor shaping the fecal bacterial communities of invasive carps. Captivity alters the microbiome community structure relative to wild fish, while species differences are pronounced within habitats. Despite the absence of a true stomach, invasive carp species exhibited a core microbiota that warrants future study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11234 · Cited by 11,726
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116
The gut flora as a forgotten organ
O'Hara, A. M., & Shanahan, F. (2006) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400731 · Cited by 2,791
Algae acquire vitamin B12 through a symbiotic relationship with bacteria
Croft, M. T., Lawrence, A. D., Raux-Deery, E., Warren, M. J., & Smith, A. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04056 · Cited by 1,536
Control of brain development, function, and behavior by the microbiome
Sampson, T. R., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2015) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.011 · Cited by 1,093
Role of gastrointestinal microbiota in fish
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Aquaculture Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02546.x · Cited by 1,073 · cited 1×
“text of aquaculture in order to identify or examine the effect of probiotics to enhance growth or health [14–16].”
BackgroundA new view of the fish gut microbiome: advances from next-generation sequencing
Ghanbari, M., Kneifel, W., & Domig, K. J. (2015) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.033 · Cited by 669 · cited 1×
“and do not reflect total community diversity [14, 16].”
BackgroundKhoruts, A., Dicksved, J., Jansson, J. K., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0b013e3181c87e02 · Cited by 649
Self-citationHamilton, M. J., Weingarden, A. R., Unno, T., Khoruts, A., & Sadowsky, M. J. (2013) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.23571 · Cited by 315
Self-citation
Cited by
Yukgehnaish, K., Kumar, P., Sivachandran, P., Marimuthu, K., Arshad, A., Paray, B. A., & Arockiaraj, J. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12416 · Cited by 470
Souza, F. P. D., Lima, E. C. S. D., Urrea-Rojas, A. M., Suphoronski, S. A., Facimoto, C. T., Bezerra Júnior, J. D. S., Oliveira, T. E. S. D., Pereira, U. D. P., Santis, G. W. D., Oliveira, C. A. L. D., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226977 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Eichmiller, J. J., Hamilton, M. J., Staley, C., Sadowsky, M. J., & Sorensen, P. W.
- Venue
- Microbiome
- Published
- 2016-08-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-44
- ISSN
- 2049-2618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2513129029
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environment shapes the fecal microbiome of invasive carp species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40168-016-0190-1
- The paper
- Eichmiller, J. J., Hamilton, M. J., Staley, C., Sadowsky, M. J., & Sorensen, P. W. (2016). Environment shapes the fecal microbiome of invasive carp species. Microbiome. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0190-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.