The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The urinary microbiota is similarly complex as the vaginal and penile microbiota, yet its role as a reservoir for pathogens and for recurrent polymicrobial biofilm diseases like bacterial vaginosis (BV) is not clear. RESULTS: Here, we analysed the urinary microbiota of healthy men and women and compared it with that of women during BV and after antibiotic treatment using next-generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V1-V2 regions. Eight different community types, so called urotypes (UT), were identified in healthy humans, all of which were shared between men and women, except UT 7, dominated in relative abundance by Lactobacillus crispatus, which was found in healthy women only. Orally applied metronidazole significantly reduced Shannon diversity and the mean relative abundance of Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, and Sneathia amnii, while L. iners increased to levels twofold higher than those found in healthy women. Although individual urine microbial profiles strongly responded to the antibiotic, the healthy community could not be restored. The correlation between urinary and vaginal fluid microbiota was generally weak and depending on UT and BV status. It was highest in UT 1 in acute BV (59% of samples), but after metronidazole treatment, only 3 out of 35 women showed a significant correlation between their urinary and vaginal microbiota composition. CONCLUSIONS: Urethra and bladder thus harbor microbial communities distinct from the vagina. The high abundance of BV related species in the urine of both men and women suggests that urine may act as a reservoir of pathogens and contribute to recurrence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02687789.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses
Salter, S. J., Cox, M. J., Turek, E. M., Calus, S. T., Cookson, W. O., Moffatt, M. F., Turner, P., Parkhill, J., Loman, N. J., & Walker, A. W. (2014) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z · Cited by 3,463
Cited by
Microbiome and Human Health: Current Understanding, Engineering, and Enabling Technologies
Aggarwal, N., Kitano, S., Puah, G. R. Y., Kittelmann, S., Hwang, I. Y., & Chang, M. W. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00431 · Cited by 508
The inflammatory microenvironment and microbiome in prostate cancer development
Sfanos, K. S., Yegnasubramanian, S., Nelson, W. G., & De Marzo, A. M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/nrurol.2017.167 · Cited by 469
Bacterial Vaginosis: Current Diagnostic Avenues and Future Opportunities
Redelinghuys, M. J., Geldenhuys, J., Jung, H., & Kock, M. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00354 · Cited by 167
Lewis, A. L., & Gilbert, N. M. (2020) · German Medical Science GMS Publishing House · doi:10.3205/id000046 · Cited by 79
Iron at the host-microbe interface
Gerner, R. R., Nuccio, S.-P., & Raffatellu, M. (2020) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2020.100895 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottschick, C., Deng, Z.-L., Vital, M., Masur, C., Abels, C., Pieper, D. H., & Wagner-Döbler, I.
- Venue
- Microbiome
- Published
- 2017-08-14
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-99
- ISSN
- 2049-2618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2750528901
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3
- The paper
- Gottschick, C., Deng, Z.-L., Vital, M., Masur, C., Abels, C., Pieper, D. H., & Wagner-Döbler, I. (2017). The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment. Microbiome. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0305-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.