Cited by 18Family Support in IllnessMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

A study protocol for Truce: a pragmatic controlled trial of a seven-week acceptance and commitment therapy program for young people who have a parent with cancer

Open access
Patterson, Pandora, McDonald, Fiona E J, Ciarrochi, Joseph, Hayes, Louise, Tracey, Danielle, Wakefield, Claire E., White, Kate·2015·BMC Psychology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper presents the rationale and study protocol for a pragmatic controlled effectiveness trial of Truce, a prevention-based selective intervention targeting the significant mental health needs of young people who have a parent with cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: Truce is a seven week, facilitated, face-to-face group program. The design is a 2 groups (intervention vs control) x 3 (pre-treatment vs post-treatment vs 2 month follow-up) repeated measures. Allocation to groups will be dependent upon recruitment; when groups have sufficient numbers, they will be assigned to the intervention condition, but participants recruited without a viable group will be assigned to the wait-list control condition. Eligible participants are young people aged 14 to 22 years who have a parent diagnosed with cancer within the last 5 years. Wait-list controls are offered the opportunity to participate in the program once they have completed their follow-up questionnaires. The target sample size is 65 participants in each condition. The primary hypothesis is that participants in the intervention will show significant reductions in distress and increases in psychological well-being relative to participants in the wait-list control group, and these effects will continue through two-month follow-up. Mixed-models analysis of variance will be used to measure differences between the two conditions. Secondary analyses will focus on variables which may relate to the effectiveness of the intervention: ACT-related concepts of experiential avoidance and mindfulness, family functioning, unmet needs and demographic variables. We will also assess program fidelity and satisfaction. DISCUSSION: The development and evaluation of a manualised intervention for young people with a parent with cancer responds to a gap in the provision of empirically-based psychological support for this vulnerable group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000761561. Registered 22(nd) July 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40359-015-0087-y

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Introducing values to cancer patients may motivate them to follow group sessions and be more committed to sessions' related exercises, which confirms a consistent decrease in FOP by T3.

    “introducing values to cancer patients may motivate them to follow group sessions and be more committed to sessions' related exercises, which confirms a consistent decrease in FOP by T 3 .34,35,37”

    From A randomized clinical trial: Efficacy of group-based acceptance and commitment therapy program for breast cancer patients with high fear of progression (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Background sections on ACT and the Truce sessions describe identifying values and taking action consistent with them. But Truce is a study protocol for young people who have a parent with cancer, not cancer patients; its Fidelity measures propose tracking attendance and homework engagement, not showing that values improve either. It reports no decrease in fear of progression by T3. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patterson, P., McDonald, F. E. J., Ciarrochi, J., Hayes, L., Tracey, D., Wakefield, C. E., & White, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Patterson, Pandora
Venue
BMC Psychology
Published
2015-09-09
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
31-31
ISSN
2050-7283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1821804882
Cited by
18
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Catholic University
  • Australian Rotary Health
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Western Sydney
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1067501)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological distress, psychological well-being, experiential avoidance, mindfulness, family functioning, unmet needs, group intervention, implementation fidelity, program satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Australia, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Neoplasms, New Zealand, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review