CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 269Resilience and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological resilience and positive coping styles among Chinese undergraduate students: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Wu, Yu, Yu, Wenzhou, Wu, Xiuyun, Wan, Huihui, Wang, Ying, Lu, Guohua·2020·BMC Psychology
DOI 10.1186/s40359-020-00444-yPMC PMC7406959
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Psychological resilience and coping strategies have been found to be related to various psychological and mental health problems. Evaluations of the relationship between resilience and coping style among university students are important for developing effective health promotion strategies focused on resilience intervention to benefit students’ health and well-being. The relationship between psychological resilience and coping styles has usually been examined among adults and patients. Very few studies have investigated the relationship between resilience and coping style in university students. The present study aimed to investigate the associations between psychological resilience, students’ characteristics (gender, major and grade) and coping styles among undergraduate students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among undergraduate students in Shandong Province, China. Undergraduate students were randomly selected from 6 universities in 3 cities of the province using a stratified random sampling method. The questionnaire included questions on the participants’ demographic information, including gender, grade and major, measures of psychological resilience and coping style. Coping style was measured by the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). The Asian Resilience Scale (ARS) was applied to evaluate undergraduates’ psychological resilience. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between resilience, students’ characteristics and positive coping styles. Results: A sample of 1743 undergraduates was analysed. The mean psychological resilience score was 70.41. The mean score for positive coping style was 24.72. Multiple regression analysis showed that three factors of psychological resilience, mood control, self-plasticity and coping flexibility, were all significant factors for positive coping styles (regression coefficient = 0.34, 0.35, 0.14, p < 0.01 for the three factors, respectively). Medical students and females had higher scores for positive coping styles than non-medical students and males ( p < 0.01). Conclusions: The research revealed that females and medical students are more likely than males and non-medical students to adopt positive coping styles. Higher psychological resilience is associated with a better positive coping style. The findings suggest that psychological education and health promotion programmes that target strengthening psychological resilience among undergraduate students may help foster positive coping styles to benefit their mental health and psychological well-being.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40359-020-00444-y

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Frequency distribution (%) of the participants by gender, major and grade level (N = 1743)
Fig. 1 Frequency distribution (%) of the participants by gender, major and grade level (N = 1743)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Confirmatory factor analysis for the 3-factor structure of the Asian Resilience Scale. Legend: T1–T19 are items in the Asian Resilience Scale; The numbers between the latent factors (self-plasticity, mood control and coping flexibility) and the items are correlation coefficients for the items; numbers between the three latent factors are correlation coefficients for the factors
Fig. 2 Confirmatory factor analysis for the 3-factor structure of the Asian Resilience Scale. Legend: T1–T19 are items in the Asian Resilience Scale; The numbers between the latent factors (self-plasticity, mood control and coping flexibility) and the items are correlation coefficients for the items; numbers between the three latent factors are correlation coefficients for the factorsCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Sha T. College students’ adaptation from the whole concept of life development theory. Beijing Normal Univ Acad J. 2000;2:81–7.
  2. Jiao L, Zhang H. Analysis of mental health status and personality of medical college students. Chin J Health Psychol. 2007;15:231–4.
  3. Liu J. Overview on study progress of college students’ mental health in recent 20 years. Career Horizon. 2009(10):168–9.
  4. Sun W, Wei G. Study and analysis on undergraduates’ mental health status from 2007 to. Popular Literature (Academic Version). 2009;2010:195–6.
  5. Zhu H, Lu G, Liu H. Explore the correlations among resilience, stress and school adjustment of middle school students. Med Soc. 2012;5:71–3.
  6. Wan H, Wang Y, Lu G, University WM. The relationship between psychological stress and psychological harmony of medical students: mediation role of resilience. Chin J Health Psychol. 2015;10:1516–20.
  7. Xie Y. Reliability and validity of the simplified coping style questionnaire. Chin J Clin Psych. 1998;2:53–4.
  8. Poursardar F, Abbaspour Z, Abdi Zarrin S, Sangari AA. The effect of resiliency on mental health and life satisfaction: a psychological pattern of well-being. J Lorestan Univ Med Sci. 2012;14:81–9.
  9. Chen LX, Yao Y. Influential factors on mental health of the elderly people–analysis of two factors by personal characteristics and coping styles. Market Demographic Analysis. 2006;12:63–4.
  10. Fu Y, Yin K, Wang J. Survey on the status of mental health education services in 6 areas of China. China J Health Educ. 2017;4:295–8.
  11. Zhang Y. The function and realization of mental health education in ideological and political education of college studentsPhD thesis. Hebei Normal University, China; 2018.
  12. Huang X, Yong Z, Bi C, Chen Y. Problems about the construction of the mental health service system in China. Psychol Sci. 2007;1:2–5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 269

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Yu, W., Wu, X., Wan, H., Wang, Y., & Lu, G.
Affiliations
Weifang Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Ying
  • Lu, Guohua
ORCID
Venue
BMC Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-08-06
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
79-79
ISSN
2050-7283 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s40359-020-00444-y
PMC
PMC7406959
OpenAlex
W3047541612
Cited by
269
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Department of Education of Shandong Province (Grant number: J17RA137 & J13WH08)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
psychological resilience, positive coping, undergraduate students, university students, gender differences, medical students, coping flexibility, student mental health, health promotion
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Asian People, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review