The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial intelligence (AI) -integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: students and teachers’ perceptions and attitudes
Open accessAbstract
Background: Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational applications is becoming increasingly prevalent, bringing opportunities and challenges to the learning environment. While AI applications have the potential to enhance structured learning, they may also significantly impact students’ creativity and academic emotions. Objectives: This study aims to explore the effects of AI-integrated educational applications on college students’ creativity and academic emotions from the perspectives of both students and teachers. It also assessed undergraduate students’ and faculty’s attitudes to AI-integrated applications. Methodology: A mixed-method research design was used. In the first phase, a qualitative research approach was employed, utilizing theoretical sampling to select informants. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with undergraduate students and university lecturers to gain comprehensive insights into their experiences and perceptions. A scale was developed, validated, and administered to 120 students and faculty in the quantitative phase. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. Findings: The study revealed that AI applications often impose rigid frameworks that constrain creative thinking and innovation, leading to emotional disengagement due to AI interactions’ repetitive and impersonal nature. Additionally, constant AI assessments heightened performance anxiety, and technical frustrations disrupted the learning process. Conversely, AI applications stimulated creativity by introducing new ideas and problem-solving techniques, enhanced engagement through interactive elements, provided personalized feedback, and supported emotional well-being with gamified elements and constant availability. Quantitative data also verified that teachers and students have positive attitudes toward the benefits and challenges of these applications. Conclusions: AI integration in educational applications has a dual-edged impact on college students’ creativity and academic emotions. While there are notable benefits in stimulating creativity and enhancing engagement, significant challenges such as creativity constraints, emotional disengagement, and performance anxiety must be addressed. Balancing these factors requires thoughtful implementation and continuous evaluation to optimize the role of AI in education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 · Cited by 8,559
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4 · Cited by 3,931
21st century skills: learning for life in our times
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5788 · Cited by 2,968
Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013688 · Cited by 2,669
VanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323
Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide
Warschauer, M. (2003) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001 · Cited by 1,825
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7 · Cited by 1,567
Social robots for education: a review.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 · Cited by 1,558
Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 · Cited by 1,229
Academic Emotions and Student Engagement
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12 · Cited by 1,181 · cited 1×
“This phenomenon is supported by studies showing that human interaction plays a crucial role in maintaining student engagement and emotional connection [53, 54].”
Background
Cited by
Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15040396 · Cited by 101
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., İslamoğlu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z · Cited by 69
Jia, W., Pan, L., & Neary, S. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15101348 · Cited by 45
“This causes performance anxiety and reduces motivation for independent learning among students, as they may become less inclined to consult traditional resources or collaborate with peers (Lin & Chen, 2024), thereby hindering their academic achievement.”
Yuan, Y., Fu, J., Leng, L., Wen, Z., Wei, X., Han, D., Hu, X., Liang, Y., Luo, Q., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1672140 · Cited by 25
Abubakar, U., Falade, A. A., & Ibrahim, H. A. (2024) · Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research · doi:10.25082/amler.2024.02.009 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, H., & Chen, Q.
- Venue
- BMC Psychology
- Published
- 2024-09-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-487
- ISSN
- 2050-7283 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402582234
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 102.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial intelligence (AI) -integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: students and teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0
- The paper
- Lin, H., & Chen, Q. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) -integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: students and teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.