The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs
Open accessAbstract
The Go-Lab federation of online labs opens up virtual laboratories (simulation), remote laboratories (real equipment accessible at distance) and data sets from physical laboratory experiments (together called “online labs”) for large-scale use in education. In this way, Go-Lab enables inquiry-based learning that promotes acquisition of deep conceptual domain knowledge and inquiry skills, with the further intent of interesting students in careers in science. For students, Go-Lab offers the opportunity to perform scientific experiments with online labs in pedagogically structured learning spaces. Go-Lab’s inquiry learning spaces (ILSs) structure the students’ inquiry process through an inquiry cycle and provide students with guidance in which dedicated (and connected) scaffolds for inquiry processes play a pivotal role. Teachers can create and adapt inquiry learning phases and the associated guidance in an ILS through a simple wiki-like interface and can add scaffolds and tools to an ILS using a straightforward drag and drop feature. Teachers can also adapt scaffolds and tools (e.g., change the language or the concepts available in a concept mapper) through an “app composer”. In creating ILSs, teachers are supported by scenarios and associated defaults ILSs that can be used as a starting point for development. In addition, teachers are offered a community framework to disseminate best practices and find mutual support. For lab-owners, Go-Lab provides open interfacing solutions for easily plugging in their online labs and sharing them in the Go-Lab federation of online labs. In its first year, Go-Lab created ILSs for thirteen online labs from different lab providers, including renowned research organizations (e.g., CERN, ESA) that participate in the consortium. The design of these inquiry learning spaces has been evaluated through mock-ups and prototypes with students and teachers. More advanced and later versions will be evaluated and validated in large scale pilots. The sustainability of Go-Lab will come from the opportunity for the larger science education community to add new online labs and share ILSs. An open and Web-based community will capitalize on the “collective intelligence” of students, teachers, and scientists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5643 · Cited by 2,313
Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021017 · Cited by 1,338 · cited 2×
“In a recent meta-analysis that focused specifically on inquiry learning with simulations, d ’ Angelo et al. (2014) concluded that students who learned with a simulation had better achievements than students who followed an alternative form of instruction and that adding guidance to a simulation,…”
BackgroundResultPhysical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education
de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230579 · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationExperimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312457206 · Cited by 1,021
All Other Things Being Equal: Acquisition and Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy
Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00081 · Cited by 736
America's lab report: investigations in high school science
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-6484 · Cited by 490
PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1161948 · Cited by 394
Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science
Linn, M. C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131408 · Cited by 274
Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00259.x · Cited by 205
Simulations for STEM learning: Systematic review and meta-analysis
D’Angelo, C. M., Rutstein, D. W., Harris, C. R., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., & Haertel, G. D. (2014) · Cited by 171
Cited by
Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationMeta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315627366 · Cited by 967
Rodriguez-Gil, L., Garcia-Zubia, J., Orduna, P., Villar-Martinez, A., & Lopez-De-Ipina, D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2883500 · Cited by 20
Soysal, Y. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00266-3 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D.
- Venue
- Smart Learning Environments
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-7091 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137499279
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 35.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40561-014-0003-6
- The paper
- de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D. (2014). Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0003-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.