The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis
Open accessAbstract
The Metaverse has been the centre of attraction for educationists for quite some time. This field got renewed interest with the announcement of social media giant Facebook as it rebranding and positioning it as Meta. While several studies conducted literature reviews to summarize the findings related to the Metaverse in general, no study to the best of our knowledge focused on systematically summarizing the finding related to the Metaverse in education. To cover this gap, this study conducts a systematic literature review of the Metaverse in education. It then applies both content and bibliometric analysis to reveal the research trends, focus, and limitations of this research topic. The obtained findings reveal the research gap in lifelogging applications in educational Metaverse. The findings also show that the design of Metaverse in education has evolved over generations, where generation Z is more targeted with artificial intelligence technologies compared to generation X or Y. In terms of learning scenarios, there have been very few studies focusing on mobile learning, hybrid learning, and micro learning. Additionally, no study focused on using the Metaverse in education for students with disabilities. The findings of this study provide a roadmap of future research directions to be taken into consideration and investigated to enhance the adoption of the Metaverse in education worldwide, as well as to enhance the learning and teaching experiences in the Metaverse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 · Cited by 12,156
Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 · Cited by 2,664
Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review
Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020) · CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002 · Cited by 2,422
Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications
Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., & Xu, C. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017 · Cited by 1,875
A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges
Park, S.-M., & Kim, Y.-G. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3140175 · Cited by 1,824
3D Virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities
Dionisio, J. D. N., III, W. G. B., & Gilbert, R. (2013) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2480741.2480751 · Cited by 1,151
(1995) · International journal of educational telecommunications · Cited by 1,137
Educational Applications of Metaverse: Possibilities and Limitations
Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021) · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions · doi:10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32 · Cited by 1,076
Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing
Cimino, C., Negri, E., & Fumagalli, L. (2019) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130 · Cited by 874 · cited 1×
“…and visualization studies related to Metaverse (Zhao et al., 2022); virtual commerce from both application design and consumer behaviour in Metaverse (Shen et al., 2021), digital twin (Cimino et al., 2019; Jones et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021), 3D virtual worlds (Dionisio et al., 2013).”
Background
Cited by
Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3 · Cited by 637
“Particularly, these technologies have contributed significantly in promoting metaverse in many educational applications (Tlili et al., 2022 ).”
BackgroundHadi Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Juho Kim, J., Zhou, P., D. Kwon, Y., Hosny Saleh Metwally, A., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., et al. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027 · Cited by 369
Self-citationMetaverse ethics: exploring the social implications of the metaverse
Yasuda, A. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00507-5 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., Wang, H., Denden, M., Bozkurt, A., Lee, L.-H., Beyoglu, D., Altinay, F., Sharma, R. C., Altinay, Z., Li, Z., Liu, J., Ahmad, F., Hu, Y., Salha, S., Abed, M., & Burgos, D.
- Venue
- Smart Learning Environments
- Published
- 2022-07-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-7091 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4320070415
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 44.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x
- The paper
- Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., Wang, H., Denden, M., Bozkurt, A., Lee, L.-H., Beyoglu, D., Altinay, F., Sharma, R. C., Altinay, Z., Li, Z., Liu, J., Ahmad, F., Hu, Y., Salha, S., . . . Burgos, D. (2022). Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
