The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications
Abstract
Abstract Various kinds of engineering software and digitalized equipment are widely applied through the lifecycle of industrial products. As a result, massive data of different types are being produced. However, these data are hysteretic and isolated from each other, leading to low efficiency and low utilization of these valuable data. Simulation based on theoretical and static model has been a conventional and powerful tool for the verification, validation, and optimization of a system in its early planning stage, but no attention is paid to the simulation application during system run-time. With the development of new-generation information and digitalization technologies, more data can be collected, and it is time to find a way for the deep application of all these data. As a result, the concept of digital twin has aroused much concern and is developing rapidly. Dispute and discussions around concepts, paradigms, frameworks, applications, and technologies of digital twin are on the rise both in academic and industrial communities. After a complete search of several databases and careful selection according to the proposed criteria, 240 academic publications about digital twin are identified and classified. This paper conducts a comprehensive and in-depth review of these literatures to analyze digital twin from the perspective of concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. Research status, evolution of the concept, key enabling technologies of three aspects, and fifteen kinds of industrial applications in respective lifecycle phase are demonstrated in detail. Based on this, observations and future work recommendations for digital twin research are presented in the form of different lifecycle phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2873186 · Cited by 4,391
Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017) · Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4 · Cited by 3,727
Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 · Cited by 3,612
Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 · Cited by 2,920
The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles
Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012) · 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1818 · Cited by 2,404
Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin
Qi, Q., Tao, F., Hu, T., Anwer, N., Liu, A., Wei, Y., Wang, L., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001 · Cited by 1,579
About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing
Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141 · Cited by 1,474
Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing
Tao, F., & Zhang, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2756069 · Cited by 1,397
Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect
Boschert, S., & Rosen, R. (2016) · Mechatronic Futures · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5 · Cited by 1,158
Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin
Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., & Spottswood, S. M. (2011) · International Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1155/2011/154798 · Cited by 1,119
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 · Cited by 2,753
Digital twin: origin to future
Singh, M., Fuenmayor, E., Hinchy, E., Qiao, Y., Murray, N., & Devine, D. (2021) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi4020036 · Cited by 1,038
Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review
Opoku, D.-G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726 · Cited by 753
Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., Wang, H., Denden, M., Bozkurt, A., Lee, L.-H., et al. (2022) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x · Cited by 624
Digital Twins: State of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions
Sharma, A., Kosasih, E., Zhang, J., Brintrup, A., & Calinescu, A. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., & Xu, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 346-361
- ISSN
- 0278-6125 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3042091195
- Cited by
- 1,875
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 120.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017
- The paper
- Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., & Xu, C. (2021). Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
