CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173Artificial Intelligence in EducationEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultivating writing skills: the role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study

Open access
Punar Özçelik, Nermin, Yangın Ekşi, Gonca·2024·Smart Learning Environments
DOI 10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) has garnered considerable interest in the field of language education in recent times; however, limited research has focused on the role of AI in the specific context of register knowledge learning during English language writing. This study aims to address this research gap by examining the impact of ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot, on the acquisition of register knowledge across various writing tasks. The research design employed a one-case shot pre-experimental design, with 11 voluntary participants selected through convenience sampling. Preliminary results indicate that students found ChatGPT beneficial for acquiring formal register knowledge but perceived it as unnecessary for informal writing. Additionally, the effectiveness of ChatGPT in teaching neutral register was questioned by the participants. This research contributes to the existing literature by shedding new light on the effects of AI-generated chatbots in register learning during the writing process, offering insights into their potential as learning assistants. Further investigation is warranted to explore the broader implications and applications of AI in language learning contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Andre, T. (1998). The impact of digital and electronic technology in education: A Glacier with multiple causes? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 14(3), 17–20.
  2. Fryer, L., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44719
  3. Kohnke, L. (2022). A pedagogical chatbot: A supplemental language learning tool. RELC Journal, 54, 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688221106705 · DOI
  4. Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296–336). K. Paul, Trend, Trubner.
  5. Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.165 · DOI
  6. Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.169 · DOI
  7. Reid, T. B. W. (1956). Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 8(1), 28–37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–173 of 173

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Punar Özçelik, N., & Yangın Ekşi, G.
ORCID
Venue
Smart Learning Environments
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-03-18
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2196-7091 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8
OpenAlex
W4392917047
Cited by
115
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 28
FWCI
43.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Smart Learning Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
ChatGPT, AI chatbots, English writing, formal register, informal register, writing skills, learning assistants, artificial intelligence in language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review