Factors influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: matched mentors and mindsets
Open accessAbstract
Background: Women and ethnic minorities remain underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. The goal of this pilot study is to better understand the beliefs and experiences of underrepresented US students pursuing STEM. Our focus was to gain insights into their mentorship experiences and preferences regarding having mentors who are gender and ethnicity matched. Environmental and psychological factors associated with participants’ decision to pursue STEM, such as family influences, academic mindsets, and attitudes towards STEM, were also studied. Methods: We developed a survey tool based on published literature and established instruments, including measures of STEM belonging, science identity, and growth mindset, as well as measures assessing students’ views on their STEM participation. We surveyed members of a STEM-focused non-profit who were in college, graduate school, or were recent graduates. Results: Forty-eight adults currently pursuing STEM responded to the survey. The majority (71%) were female and nearly all (96%) identified as an ethnic minority. Most reported knowing someone of their same gender (68%) or ethnicity (66%) with a STEM career who served as a role model. The majority (54%) stated that meeting a STEM professional of their own gender and ethnicity would be effective encouragement to pursue STEM. A similar percentage (56%) believed that media exposure to gender- and ethnicity-matched STEM professionals would be effective encouragement. Most (73%) demonstrated a growth mindset and had strong family support to pursue STEM (68%). Only two-thirds (66%) felt they belonged in STEM careers, and 30% agreed that people in their STEM classes are a lot like them. Conclusion: This study contributes additional information on the views and experiences of diverse students actively pursuing STEM. Most participants indicated the importance of meeting and being mentored in STEM by those of their same gender and ethnicity, either in person or through media. Future educational efforts to increase STEM diversity should consider students’ mentorship preferences and facilitate interactions with matched-background mentors accordingly, with consideration given to the use of media. Educators should focus on inclusive learning by highlighting the accomplishments of diverse STEM professionals, to help strengthen feelings of STEM belonging.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Representation matters, leading to an increased sense of belonging.
“Since we know representation matters, leading to an increased sense of belonging [34]”
From Supporting underrepresented students in health sciences: a fuzzy cognitive mapping approach to program evaluation (2024) · cites this paper as [34]
The Discussion and conclusions section reports that women engineering students assigned a female peer mentor experienced greater belonging, and recommends highlighting diverse STEM professionals to help strengthen belonging. Those passages support the importance of representation, but the paper presents a general increase in belonging as a potential benefit, not an established outcome across settings. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines
Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1261375 · Cited by 1,516 · see citing works
Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children's interests
Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah6524 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM
Rainey, K., Dancy, M., Mickelson, R., Stearns, E., & Moller, S. (2018) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21499 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Research mentoring and scientist identity: insights from undergraduates and their mentors
Robnett, R. D., Nelson, P. A., Zurbriggen, E. L., Crosby, F. J., & Chemers, M. M. (2018) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0139-y · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Blake-Beard, S., Bayne, M. L., Crosby, F. J., & Muller, C. B. (2011). Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: keeping our eyes on the prize. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 622-643.
- Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women's positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 114(23), 5964-5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1613117114. · DOI
- Elliott, L., & Bachman, H.J. (2018). Parents educational beliefs and children's early academics: examining the role of SES. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.022 · DOI
- Ito, T. A., & McPherson, E. (2018). Factors influencing high school students' interest in pSTEM. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1535. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.01535. · DOI
- Kim, A. Y., & Sinatra, G. M. (2018). Science identity development: an interactionist approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 51. https://doi.org/10. 1186/s40594-018-0149-9. · DOI
- Lewis, K.L., Stout, J.G., Finkelstein, N.D., Pollock, S.J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G.L., & Ito, T. A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0361684317720186. · DOI · Paper page
- Mishra, S. (2020). Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: a systematic review with a special focus on "underrepresented" students. Educational Research Review, 29. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100307 · DOI · Paper page
- Montgomery, B. L. (2018). Building and sustaining diverse functioning networks using social media and digital platforms to improve diversity and inclusivity. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 5, 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00022. · DOI
- Olsson, M., & Martiny, S. E. (2018). Does exposure to counterstereotypical role models influence girls' and women's gender stereotypes and career choices? A review of social psychological research. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02264. · DOI
- Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206-245. https://doi. org/10.1002/tea.21417. · DOI · Paper page
- Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol, 10(6), 721-726.
- Steinke, J. (2017). Adolescent girls' STEM identity formation and media images of STEM professionals: considering the influence of contextual cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716. · DOI · Paper page
- Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C.D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5. · DOI
- Walton, G. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0963721413512856. · DOI · Paper page
- Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: race, social fit and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82-96.
- Wu, L., & Jing, W. (2013). Leadership hurdles. Nature, 493, 125-126. https://doi. org/10.1038/nj7430-125a. · DOI
- Zaniewski, A. M., & Reinholz, D. (2016). Increasing STEM success: a near-peer mentoring program in the physical sciences. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0043-2. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiang, D. F., Guerrero, S. A., Sexton, E. C., & Gardner, S. S. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05292-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kricorian, K., Seu, M., Lopez, D., Ureta, E., & Equils, O.
- Corresponding author
- Kricorian, Katherine
- Venue
- International Journal of STEM Education
- Published
- 2020-04-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-7822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3028897110
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 39.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of STEM Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Colorado Boulder
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- underrepresented students, STEM participation, growth mindset, science identity, role models, family support, women in STEM, diversity in STEM
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
