Cited by 158Science Education and PerceptionsCareer Development and DiversityMedia, Gender, and Advertising

Adolescent Girls’ STEM Identity Formation and Media Images of STEM Professionals: Considering the Influence of Contextual Cues

Open access
Steinke, Jocelyn·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Popular media have played a crucial role in the construction, representation, reproduction, and transmission of stereotypes of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals, yet little is known about how these stereotypes influence STEM identity formation. Media images of STEM professionals may be important sources of information about STEM and may be particularly salient and relevant for girls during adolescence as they actively consider future personal and professional identities. This article describes gender-stereotyped media images of STEM professionals and examines theories to identify variables that explain the potential influence of these images on STEM identity formation. Understanding these variables is important for expanding current conceptual frameworks of science/STEM identity to better understand how and when cues in the broader sociocultural context may affect adolescent girls’ STEM identity. This article emphasizes the importance of focusing on STEM identity relevant variables and STEM identity status to explain individual differences in STEM identity formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bem S. L. (1993). The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Identity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  2. Gamson W. A. Modigliani A. (1987). “The changing culture of affirmative action,” in Research in Political Sociology Vol. 3 eds Braungart R. G. Braungart M. M. (Greenwich, CT: JAI), 137– 177.
  3. Herrera F. A. Hurtado S. Garcia G. A. Gasiewski J. (2012). A model for redefining STEM identity for talented STEM graduate students. Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC.
  4. Long M. Boiarsky G. Thayer G. (2001). Gender and racial counter-stereotypes in science education television: a content analysis. Public Underst. Sci. 10 255– 269. 10.1088/0963-6625/10/3/301 · DOI
  5. Marcia J. E. (ed.) (1980). Identity in Adolescence. New York, NY: Wiley.
  6. Oyserman D. (2015a). “Identity-based motivation,” in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, eds Scott R. Kosslyn S. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons), 1– 11.
  7. Weinreich-Haste H. (1981). “The image of science,” in The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education, ed. Kelly A. (Manchester: Manchester University Press), 216– 229.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinke, J.
Affiliations
Western Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Steinke, Jocelyn
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-05-26
Volume
8
Pages
716-716
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2619896152
Cited by
158
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Western Michigan University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
STEM identity, adolescent girls, gender stereotypes, science identity, contextual cues, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review