Cited by 11Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

What prevents STEM universities from widening participation? A systematic literature review on global experiences

Open access
Liu, Zhuhuan, Kringos, Nicole·2025·International Journal of STEM Education

Abstract

A prevailing concern in higher education, especially within the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), often refers to underrepresentation of certain social groups. While the public attention is drawn to the aggregated statistics reflecting participation issues at a macro societal level, the essence of the debate is the real underrepresented individuals behind each number that have been hindered by any tangible or impalpable reasons. Thus, how to address existing disparities in education systems by looking beyond the aggregate number to the nuanced barriers faced by different groups becomes vital. Based on a systematic literature review, this research aims to explore the complex barriers and opportunities regarding the expansion of participation in STEM education. By analyzing global examples, the study identifies socioeconomic disadvantages, exclusionary institutional practices, and internal psychological barriers such as low confidence, lack of belonging, and stereotype threat as key factors that hinder the engagement of marginalized communities in STEM fields. Drawn on a meta-analysis, the research also evaluates successful intervention practices, such as role model-based initiatives and inclusive educational environments, and values-affirmation exercises, which have been shown to improve motivation, strengthen self-efficacy, and increase retention in STEM. Additionally, the study synthesizes these findings to propose systemic reforms at individual, institutional, and governmental levels. In summary, this research offers evidence-based and actionable strategies, leading to a more inclusive STEM landscape for sustainable development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40594-025-00580-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Creating clear and accessible pathways from secondary to higher education, such as many SBPs reported here, is an area where governments can make a significant impact.

    “As Liu and Kringos (2025) state, creating clear and accessible pathways from secondary to higher education, such as many SBPs reported here, is an area where governments can make a significant impact.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. Adnett, N. (2006). Student finance and widening participation in the British Isles: common problems, different solutions. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(4), 296-311. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1468-2273. 2006. 00325.x · DOI
  2. Alam, M. S., Sajid, S., Kok, J. K., Rahman, M., & Amin, A. (2021). Factors that influence high school female students' intentions to pursue science, technology, engineering and mathematics (stem) education in malay- sia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(2), 839-867. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4783/ pjssh. 29.2. 06 · DOI
  3. Albuquerque, M. J. B., Awadalla, D. M. M., Albuquerque, F. D. B., & Aly Hassan, A. (2023). Awareness and adoption of evidence-based instructional practices by stem faculty in the UAE and USA. Education Sciences, 13(2), 204. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ educs ci130 20204 · DOI
  4. Allen, J. K. (2017). Exploring the role teacher perceptions play in the under- representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted programming. Gifted Child Today, 40(2), 77-86. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 10762 17517 690188 · DOI
  5. Almukhambetova, A., Kuzhabekova, A., & Hernández-Torrano, D. (2023). Hidden bias, low expectations, and social stereotypes: understanding female students' retention in math-intensive stem fields. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 535-557. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10763-022-10256-8 · DOI
  6. Archer, L., & Yamashita, H. (2003). 'knowing their limits'? identities, inequalities and inner city school leavers' post-16 aspirations. Journal of Education Policy, 18(1), 53-69. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02680 93032 00004 2209 · DOI
  7. Banerjee, P., & Graham, L. (2023). Stem education in England: Questioning the "leaky pipeline" metaphor. Education + Training. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ et-03-2023-0079 · DOI
  8. Beach, D. (2013). Changing higher education: converging policy-packages and experiences of changing academic work in Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 517-533. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02680 939. 2013. 782426 · DOI
  9. Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correla- tion test for publication bias. Biometrics. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 25334 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Belanger, A. L., Joshi, M. P., Fuesting, M. A., Weisgram, E. S., Claypool, H. M., & Diekman, A. B. (2020). Putting belonging in context: Communal affordances signal belonging in stem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1186-1204. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67219 897181 · DOI
  11. Berggren, C. (2008). Horizontal and vertical differentiation within higher education-gender and class perspectives. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1-2), 20-39. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1468-2273. 2008. 00381.x · DOI
  12. Bibbings, L. S. (2006). Widening participation and higher education. Journal of Law and Society, 33(1), 74-91. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1467-6478. 2006. 00348.x · DOI
  13. Binning, K. R., Kaufmann, N., McGreevy, E. M., Fotuhi, O., Chen, S., Marshman, E., et al. (2020). Changing social contexts to foster equity in college science courses: an ecological-belonging intervention. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1059-1070. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09567 97620 929984 · DOI
  14. Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between stem career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a Liu and Kringos International Journal of STEM Education (2025) 12:63 stem career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 1-15. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s40594-018-0118-3 · DOI
  15. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, sup- porting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00461 520. 1991. 96531 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Botanga, C., Blanc, S., Jones, L., Day, M., & Charles, M. (2021). Continued stem commitment in light of 2020 events: a perspective from the Illinois louis stokes alliance for minority participation. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 681027. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ feduc. 2021. 681027 · DOI
  17. Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teach- ing approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13601 44X. 2011. 568690 · DOI
  18. Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child develop- ment. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1146/ annur ev. psych. 53. 100901. 135233 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Broek, S., & Hake, B. J. (2012). Increasing participation of adults in higher educa- tion: factors for successful policies. International Journal of Lifelong Edu- cation, 31(4), 397-417. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02601 370. 2012. 663801 · DOI
  20. Brown, E. R., Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., & Diekman, A. B. (2015). Closing the communal gap: the importance of communal affordances in science career motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(12), 662-673. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ JASP. 12327 · DOI
  21. Brubacher, J. (2017). Higher education in transition: History of American colleges and universities. Routledge.
  22. Burchett, C. O., Peña, T., Monahan, C., Bermejo, R. M., Sarwana, M., & London, B. (2025). The crucial roles of campus representation and sense of belonging of undergraduates in science, technology, engineering, and math. Journal for STEM Education Research. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12264-025-01384-6 · DOI
  23. Burt, B. A., Stone, B. D., Motshubi, R., & Baber, L. D. (2023). Stem validation among underrepresented students: Leveraging insights from a stem diversity program to broaden participation. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(1), 53.
  24. Byun, S.-Y., Irvin, M. J., & Bell, B. A. (2015). Advanced math course taking: Effects on math achievement and college enrollment. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(4), 439-468. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00220 973. 2014. 919570 · DOI
  25. Campbell-Montalvo, R., Kersaint, G., Smith, C. A., Puccia, E., Sidorova, O., Cooke, H., et al. (2022). The influence of professional engineering organizations on women and underrepresented minority students' fit. Frontiers in Edu- cation, 6, Article 755471. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ feduc. 2021. 755471/ full · DOI
  26. Canning, E. A., Harackiewicz, J. M., Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., Tibbetts, Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2019). Improving performance and retention in introductory biol- ogy with a utility-value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1216-1233. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ edu00 00333 · DOI
  27. Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). Sex differences in math-intensive fields. Cur- rent Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 275-279. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09637 21410 383241 · DOI
  28. Çetinkaya, E., Herrmann, S. D., & Kisbu-Sakarya, Y. (2020). Adapting the values affirmation intervention to a multi-stereotype threat framework for female students in stem. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 1587-1607. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11218-020-09594-8 · DOI
  29. Chelberg, K. L., & Bosman, L. B. (2019). The role of faculty mentoring in improv- ing retention and completion rates for historically underrepresented stem students. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(2), 39-48. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5430/ IJHE. V8N2P 39 · DOI
  30. Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469-491. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1540-4560. 2011. 01710.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Chen, S., Binning, K. R., Manke, K. J., Brady, S. T., McGreevy, E. M., Betancur, L., & Kaufmann, N. (2021). Am i a science person? a strong science identity bolsters minority students' sense of belonging and performance in col- lege. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), 593-606. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67220 936480 · DOI
  32. Cipollone, K., Stich, A. E., & Weis, L. (2020). Stem for all: student identities and the paradox of stem democratization. Teachers College Record, 122(2), 1-67. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01614 68120 12200 212 · DOI
  33. Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experi- ments. Biometrics, 10(1), 101-129. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 30016 66 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention. Science, 313(5791), 1307-1310. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 11283 17 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minor- ity achievement gap. Science, 324(5925), 400-403. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514. 92.1. 82 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0033-2909. 112.1. 155 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Coll, C. G., & Pachter, L. M. (2002). Ethnic and minority parenting (Vol. 1). Law- rence Erlbaum Associates.
  38. Cowgill, C., Halper, L., Rios, K., & Crane, P. (2021). "why so few?'':differential effects of framing the gender gap in stem recruitment interventions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(1), 61-78. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 03616 84320 965123 · DOI
  39. Crabtree, L. M., Richardson, S. C., & Lewis, C. W. (2019). The gifted gap, stem education, and economic immobility. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(2), 203-231. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 19322 02X19 829749 · DOI
  40. Denaro, K., Dennin, K., Dennin, M., & Sato, B. (2022). Identifying systemic ineq- uity in higher education and opportunities for improvement. PloS One, 17(4), Article e0264059. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02640 59 · DOI
  41. Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051-1057. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09567 97610 377342 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Diekman, A. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., & Clark, E. K. (2017). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: understand- ing communal goal processes in stem gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142-175. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 10888 68316 642141 · DOI
  43. Doerschuk, P., Bahrim, C., Daniel, J., Kruger, J., Mann, J., & Martin, C. (2016). Clos- ing the gaps and filling the stem pipeline: a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 682-695. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10956-016-9622-8 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Eagly, A. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press.
  45. Eccles, J.S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146).
  46. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585-609. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1471-6402. 1994. tb010 49.x Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and per- formance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(2), 367-380. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 494229 · DOI
  47. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1146/ annur ev. psych. 53. 100901. 135153 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Eisenhart, M., & Allen, C. D. (2020). Addressing underrepresentation of young women of color in engineering and computing through the lens of sociocultural theory. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 793-824. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11422-020-09976-6 · DOI
  49. Liu and Kringos International Journal of STEM Education (2025) 12:63
  50. El-Deghaidy, H., Almasabi, Z., Elkholy, A., & Mansour, N. (2025). Mapping stem gender disparities: A scoping review of the Mena region. Journal for STEM Education Research. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s41979-025-00149-0 · DOI
  51. Gallacher, J. (2006). Widening access or differentiation and stratification in higher education in scotland. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(4), 349-369. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1468-2273. 2006. 00328.x · DOI
  52. Gan, Y. T., Ng, K. H., Chandesa, T., Chai, X. Y., August, A. L., & Lee, K. W. (2024). A systematic review of stem interventions in rural education: July 2013 to June 2023. Journal for STEM Education Research. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s41979-024-00140-1 · DOI
  53. Garcia-Reid, P. (2007). Examining social capital as a mechanism for improving school engagement among low income hispanic girls. Youth & Society, 39(2), 164-181. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00441 18X07 303263 · DOI
  54. Garibay, J. C. (2018). Beyond traditional measures of stem success: long-term predictors of social agency and conducting research for social change. Research in Higher Education, 59, 349-381. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11162-017-9470-2 · DOI
  55. Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., & Hu, X. (2024). Cross-cultural patterns of gender differences in stem: gender stratification, gender equality and gender-equality paradoxes. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 37. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10648-024-09872-3 · DOI
  56. Halimi, S., & Hristoskova, S. (2001). Lifelong learning for equity and social cohesion: a new challenge for higher education. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 7(1), 21-32. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14779 71401 00700 103 · DOI
  57. Hallström, J., & Schönborn, K. J. (2019). Models and modelling for authentic stem education: Reinforcing the argument. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 22. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s40594-019-0178-z · DOI
  58. Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Giffen, C. J., Blair, S. S., Rouse, D. I., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first- generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 375-389. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ A0034 679 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: a gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978-1003. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ TEA. 20363 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Heilbronner, N. N. (2011). Stepping onto the stem pathway: factors affecting talented students' declaration of stem majors in college. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(6), 876-899. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01623 53211 425100 · DOI
  61. Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. (2016). The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in stem courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), 258-268. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 01973 533. 2016. 12097 · DOI
  62. Howley, C., Campbell, J., Cowley, K., & Cook, K. (2022). Pathways and structures: evaluating systems changes in an nsf includes alliance. American Journal of Evaluation, 43(4), 632-646. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 10982 14021 104160 · DOI
  63. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 10497 32305 276687 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581.
  65. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494-495. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 11603 64 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Islam, N., & Jirattikorn, A. (2024). Breaking gender barriers in stem education for achieving the sdg of quality education in Bangladesh. Development in Practice, 34(1), 129-135. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09614 524. 2023. 22299 · DOI
  67. Islam, N., & Jirattikorn, A. (2024). Navigating structural constraints: women's agency in engineering studies and teaching in Bangladesh. Higher Education. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10734-023-01177-8 · DOI
  68. Ives, J., Falk, J., & Drayton, B. (2023). Broadening participation in stem through equity-minded high-impact practices: a multimodal systematic review. Higher Education. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10734-023-01165-y · DOI
  69. Jasko, K., Dukala, K., & Szastok, M. (2019). Focusing on gender similarities increases female students' motivation to participate in stem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(8), 473-487. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jasp. 12598 · DOI
  70. Johnson, I. R., & Pietri, E. S. (2023). Ally endorsement: exploring allyship cues to promote perceptions of allyship and positive stem beliefs among white female students. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(3), 738-761. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 13684 30222 10804 67 · DOI
  71. Johnson, I. R., Pietri, E. S., Fullilove, F., & Mowrer, S. (2019). Exploring identity- safety cues and allyship among black women students in stem environ- ments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 131-150. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 03616 84319 830926 · DOI
  72. Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of stem education research in the gcc countries: trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 1-24. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00071 005. 2024. 23229 · DOI
  73. Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. (2014). Engaging students in stem education. Sci- ence Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
  74. King Miller, B. A. (2017). Navigating stem: afro caribbean women overcom- ing barriers of gender and race. Sage Open, 7(4), 2158244017742689. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 21582 44017 742689 · DOI
  75. Knight, G. L. (2021). Delivering a positive outcome for stem students-how tef will that be? Higher Education Pedagogies, 6, 37-40. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 23752 696. 2021. 18823 · DOI
  76. Kong, X., Dabney, K. P., & Tai, R. H. (2014). The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering. Interna- tional Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(1), 54-65. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 21548 455. 2012. 760856 · DOI
  77. Lawson, K. M., & Lips, H. M. (2014). The role of self-perceived agency and job attainability in women's impressions of successful women in masculine occupations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(6), 433-441. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ JASP. 12236 · DOI
  78. Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in stem educa- tion: a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-16. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s40594-020-00207-6 · DOI
  79. Li, Y., Xiao, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, N., Pang, Y., Wang, R., et al. (2022). A systematic review of high impact empirical studies in stem education. Interna- tional Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 72. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s40594-022-00389-1 · DOI
  80. Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-150. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/j. 2168-9830. 2011. tb000 06.x Major, J., & Godwin, A. (2018). Towards making the invisible engineer visible: A review of low-socioeconomic students' barriers experiencing college stem education. 2018 ieee frontiers in education conference (fie) (pp. 1-9). · DOI
  81. Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers' perception of stem integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-16. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s40594-018-0151-2 · DOI · Paper page
  82. McIntyre, R. B., Paulson, R. M., Taylor, C. A., Morin, A. L., & Lord, C. G. (2011). Effects of role model deservingness on overcoming performance defi- cits induced by stereotype threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 301-311. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ejsp. 774 · DOI
  83. Moore, J. L., Ford, D. Y., & Milner, H. R. (2005). Recruitment is not enough: retaining African American students in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1), 51-67. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00169 86205 04900 106 · DOI
  84. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Pietri, E. S., van der Toorn, J., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2021). Boosting the sustainable representation of women in stem with evidence-based policy initiatives. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 50-58. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 23727 32220 980092 · DOI
  85. Naidoo, R. (2000). The third way to widening participation and maintaining quality in higher education: lessons from the united kingdom. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 1(2), ,
  86. Ortagus, J. C., Kelchen, R., Rosinger, K., & Voorhees, N. (2020). Performance- based funding in american higher education: a systematic synthesis of the intended and unintended consequences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 520-550. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3102/ 01623 73720 953128 · DOI
  87. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09500 69032 00003 2199 · DOI
  88. Osborne, J. W., & Jones, B. D. (2011). Identification with academics and moti- vation to achieve in school: how the structure of the self influences aca- demic outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 131-158. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S10648-011-9151-1 · DOI
  89. Osborne, M. (2003). Increasing or widening participation in higher educa- tion?: A european overview. European Journal of Education, 38(1), 5-24. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ 1467-3435. 00125 · DOI
  90. Osborne, M. (2003). Policy and practice in widening participation: a six country comparative study of access as flexibility. International Journal of Life- long Education, 22(1), 43-58. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02601 37030 4826 · DOI
  91. Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college stem retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ A0034 027 · DOI
  92. Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in stem. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 377-397. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11218-013-9218-6 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Roberts, D.A., & Bybee, R.W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. Handbook of research on science education, volume ii (pp. 559-572). Routledge.
  94. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engage- ment and achievement: a meta-analytic approach. Review of Educa- tional Research, 81(4), 493-529. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3102/ 00346 54311 421793 · DOI · Paper page
  95. Rudman, L.A., Moss-Racusin, C.A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J.E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 167-227). Elsevier.
  96. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: cross- cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514. 89.6. 1010 · DOI
  97. Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on stem and non-stem student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410-427. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jasp. 12371 · DOI
  98. Smith, E., & White, P. (2011). Who is studying science? the impact of widening participation policies on the social composition of UK undergraduate science programmes. Journal of Education Policy, 26(5), 677-699. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02680 939. 2010. 540676 · DOI
  99. Smith, E., & White, P. (2024). Science for all? school science education policy and stem skills shortages. British Journal of Educational Studies. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00071 005. 2024. 23229 · DOI
  100. Stipek, D. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. Development of achievement motivation (pp. 309-332). Elsevier.
  101. Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V., & Gokulsing, D. (2022). Gender gap in stem educa- tion and career choices: what matters? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1021-1040. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ JARHE-09-2019-0235 The Swedish Ministry of Education and Science (2001). The debate on the com- mission' s memorandum on lifelong learning 2001. European Commission. · DOI
  102. Thelin, J. R. (2011). A history of American higher education. JHU Press.
  103. Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Teachers' attitudes toward teaching integrated stem: the impact of personal background characteristics and school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 987-1007. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ S10763-018-9898-7 · DOI
  104. Tiedemann, J. (2000). Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 191-207. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/A: 10039 53801 526 · DOI
  105. Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11192-009-0146-3 · DOI · Paper page
  106. Varma, R. (2009). Attracting native Americans to computing. Communications of the ACM, 52(8), 137-140. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1145/ 15366 16. 15366 50 · DOI
  107. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82-96.
  108. Wen, F., Zuo, B., Wu, Y., Dong, X., & Wang, W. (2016). Reducing the effect of stereotype threat: the role of coaction contexts and regulatory fit. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 607-626. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11218-016-9344-z · DOI
  109. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1006/ ceps. 1999. 1015 · DOI · Paper page
  110. Wilson, R. E., & Kittleson, J. (2013). Science as a classed and gendered endeavor: persistence of two white female first-generation college students within an undergraduate science context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 802-825. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ tea. 21087 · DOI
  111. Yu, W., He, J., Luo, J., & Shu, X. (2023). Interventions for gender equality in stem education: a meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jcal. 12928 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z., & Kringos, N.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Venue
International Journal of STEM Education
Published
2025-11-05
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
2196-7822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415926691
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of STEM Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • KTH Road2Science Center
  • Royal Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
STEM education, widening participation, underrepresentation, barriers to participation, marginalized communities, socioeconomic deprivation, institutional exclusion, stereotype threat, sense of belonging, self-efficacy, role models, values affirmation, student retention, inclusive education, educational equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review