Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study
Abstract
This study explores how students' physics identities are shaped by their experiences in high school physics classes and by their career outcome expectations. The theoretical framework focuses on physics identity and includes the dimensions of student performance, competence, recognition by others, and interest. Drawing data from the Persistence Research in Science and Engineering (PRiSE) project, which surveyed college English students nationally about their backgrounds, high school science experiences, and science attitudes, the study uses multiple regression to examine the responses of 3,829 students from 34 randomly selected US colleges/universities. Confirming the salience of the identity dimension for young persons' occupational plans, the measure for students' physics identity used in this study was found to strongly predict their intended choice of a physics career. Physics identity, in turn, was found to correlate positively with a desire for an intrinsically fulfilling career and negatively with a desire for personal/family time and opportunities to work with others. Physics identity was also positively predicted by several high school physics characteristics/experiences such as a focus on conceptual understanding, real‐world/contextual connections, students answering questions or making comments, students teaching classmates, and having an encouraging teacher. Even though equally beneficial for both genders, females reported experiencing a conceptual focus and real‐…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Munfaridah et al. (2022) combined Carlone and Johnson's (2007) model of identity, which includes competence, performance and recognition, with Hazari et al.'s (2010) disciplinary-based identity framework.
“For example, Munfaridah et al. (2022) combined Carlone andJohnson's (2007) model of identity, which includes competence, performance and recognition, with Hazari et al.'s (2010) disciplinary-based identity framework.”
From Understanding teacher identity in teachers' professional lives: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Hazari et al.'s (2010)
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701 · see citing works
Multiple imputation after 18+ years
Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · Cited by 4,072 · see citing works
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433 · see citing works
Allison, P. (2002) · doi:10.4135/9781412985079 · Cited by 2,050 · see citing works
The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-p · Cited by 1,717 · see citing works
Complex dilemmas of identity and practice
Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2006) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20096 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259 · see citing works
Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20118 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Self-citationTrujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21499 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review
Verhoeven, M., Poorthuis, A. M. G., & Volman, M. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9457-3 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
“…1997; Subramaniam et al. 2012) or indicated (Basu et al. 2009; Black et al. 2010; Brickhouse et al. 2000; Cobb et al. 2009; Freire et al. 2009; Hazari et al. 2010; Mittendorff et al. 2008; Mortimer et al. 2010; Polman and Miller 2010; Skerrett 2012; Tan and Calabrese Barton 2007; Thompson…”
Longitudinal associations among undergraduates' research experience, self-efficacy, and identity
Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21221 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Steinke, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Rushton, E. A. C., Rawlings Smith, E., Steadman, S., & Towers, E. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3417 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Regan, E., & DeWitt, J. (2015) · Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_5 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Research mentoring and scientist identity: insights from undergraduates and their mentors
Robnett, R. D., Nelson, P. A., Zurbriggen, E. L., Crosby, F. J., & Chemers, M. M. (2018) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0139-y · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Hazari, Z., Cass, C., & Beattie, C. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21214 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationHyater-Adams, S., Fracchiolla, C., Finkelstein, N., & Hinko, K. (2018) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.010132 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Oliver, M. C., Woods-McConney, A., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2017) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-017-0060-9 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hazari, Zahra
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 978-1003
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2053173693
- Cited by
- 1,112
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 127 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 48.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- physics identity, high school physics, career outcome expectations, gender differences, conceptual understanding, women in science, attitudes toward science, English students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review