Cited by 14Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

ESICM LIVES 2023

Open access
G Pastore, Francesca Graziano, Chiara Robba, Mattia Sivero, F Mulazzani, B Noè, Michela Consonni, E Colombo +4 more·2023·Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Abstract

Introduction. Hemodynamic monitoring is of utmost importance when treating critically ill patients, but the currently used techniques are invasive and related with catheter-related complications. Over the last two decades, carotid artery ultrasound (US) was investigated as a non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring, including cardiac output estimation. Both vessel diameter and blood velocity are needed to compute blood flow in a vessel. Traditionally, carotid flow measurements are performed with the US probe oriented in the long-axis (LA) view [1]. Assuming a circular cross-section of the vessel and a parabolic flow profile, the probe should be properly positioned along the mid-axis to obtain an accurate blood flow estimation. However, obtaining and maintaining this mid-axis parallel view is difficult and literature describes that operator experience may impact the reliability of carotid flow measurements [2]. While the short-axis (SA) view allows for measurement of the true diameter, it does not allow for velocity estimation as the Doppler frequency shift approaches 0 degrees. Another way of assessing the cross-section of the carotid artery is by rotating and tilting (RT) the probe, a view that is easier to visualize and assess for sonographers. Regarding velocity measurements, preliminary research showed that the RT view was more robust to motion and less operator-dependent than the LA view [3]. To our knowledge, there is no literature regarding clinical diameter estimates with the RT view.Objectives. To evaluate the use of the RT view in a clinical setting, and to compare it with the LA and SA views using systolic diameter and spread of systolic diameter estimates per acquisition. The spread of systolic diameter values serves as a measure of robustness.Methods. We performed 30 s US acquisitions of the carotid artery in adult cardiac surgery patients, with a LA, SA, and RT probe orientation. The 30 s US recordings were analyzed to derive a diameter waveform. From this, we computed the systolic diameter values and a measurement of spread (calculated as the IQR of the systolic diameter estimates per acquisition) and investigated for potentially significant differences between views. Results. US acquisitions were performed in 29 patients. The median systolic diameter (IQR) per 30 s acquisition was 7.08 (1.59) mm, 7.22 (1.20) mm, and 6.95 (1.77) mm for the LA, SA, and RT views, respectively (Fig. 1). The median spread (IQR) per 30 s acquisition was 0.12 (0.13) mm, 0.10 (0.10) mm, and 0.09 (0.10) mm for the LA, SA, and RT views, respectively. Normality was checked using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Friedman tests showed no statistically significant difference between the views for either the median (p=0.142) or spread (p=0.786) of systolic diameter per 30 s acquisition. Conclusions. It was feasible to acquire data and derive diameter estimates using the three probe orientations. The median and spread in systolic diameter values per 30 s acquisition were comparable for the LA, SA, and RT views, suggesting that the different views result in evenly robust measurements and can be used interchangeably to obtain diameter estimates. This study opens the path for further investigation of the newly introduced RT view for new applications and possibilities, such as hands-free measurements.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In adult cardiac surgery patients, carotid artery ultrasound diameter estimates obtained with long-axis (LA), short-axis (SA), and rotated-and-tilted (RT) probe orientations were comparable, suggesting the three views yield evenly robust measurements and can be used interchangeably. The RT view is proposed as an easier-to-acquire alternative that may enable new applications such as hands-free measurements.

Key findings

  • Median systolic diameter (IQR) per 30 s acquisition was 7.08 (1.59) mm for LA, 7.22 (1.20) mm for SA, and 6.95 (1.77) mm for RT.
  • Median spread (IQR) per 30 s acquisition was 0.12 (0.13) mm for LA, 0.10 (0.10) mm for SA, and 0.09 (0.10) mm for RT.
  • Friedman tests showed no statistically significant difference between views for either the median (p = 0.142) or the spread (p = 0.786) of systolic diameter per 30 s acquisition.
  • It was feasible to acquire data and derive diameter estimates using all three probe orientations.

Methods

  • Design: comparative study of carotid artery ultrasound acquisitions in three probe orientations (LA, SA, RT), each 30 s, in adult cardiac surgery patients.
  • Sample: US acquisitions were performed in 29 patients.
  • Analysis: 30 s recordings were processed to derive a diameter waveform; systolic diameter values and a spread measure (IQR of systolic diameter estimates per acquisition) were computed. Normality was checked with the Shapiro-Wilk test and differences between views were tested with Friedman tests.

Limitations

  • Stated: the paper does not explicitly list limitations; it frames the work as opening "the path for further investigation" of the RT view.
  • Evident from the text: the sample is small (29 patients) and drawn from a single clinical setting (adult cardiac surgery in the operating room), and the study evaluates only diameter estimates, not velocity or blood-flow/cardiac-output estimation, so interchangeability for flow measurement is not established.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40635-023-00546-y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 3 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § 000334 · p. 3

    Operator experience may impact the reliability of carotid flow measurements.

    “obtaining and maintaining this mid-axis parallel view is difficult and literature describes that operator experience may impact the reliability of carotid flow measurements [2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] [2] R. Osgood, In training emergency physicians the carotid artery Doppler with passive leg raise, does previous sonographic experience influence scan time and competency?, Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 20-26, 2020. - 3) source

      The Reliability Parameter section (page unavailable) says differences in participants’ prior scanning experience may have altered their performance. But it also states that the study did not assess the reliability of their measurements against a gold standard; the Discussion reports no correlation between prior experience and scan quality. The paper therefore supports a possible effect on performance, not the claimed effect on measurement reliability. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data
    § 000335 · p. 3

    Multidrug-resistant (MR) Pseudomonas was significantly higher in patients who died.

    “Multidrug-resistant (MR) Pseudomonas and MR Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were significantly higher in patients who died (Table 1).”
    • Also stated in: § 000335 · p. 3 · plain
      “Pseudomonas MRs and GNB MRs also had significantly higher mortality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 000334 · p. 3

    The median systolic diameter per 30 s acquisition was 6.95 (IQR 1.77) mm for the RT view.

    “The median systolic diameter (IQR) per 30 s acquisition was 7.08 (1.59) mm, 7.22 (1.20) mm, and 6.95 (1.77) mm for the LA, SA, and RT views, respectively (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Take down policy · p. 2

    There were no statistically significant differences between the SDD and non-SDD groups in admission type or demographics.

    “There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of admission type or demographics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 000335 · p. 3

    Neoplasm was an independent mortality risk factor (OR 2.567, 95% CI 1.532-4.304).

    “Independent mortality risk factors were: renal replacement therapy Odds Ratio (OR): 4.662 (3.373; 6.444), neoplasm OR: 2.567 (1.532; 4.304), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP):OR: 1.980 (1.407; 2. 787), parenteral nutrition OR: 1.927 (1.322; 2.809), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) OR:1. 852 (1.223; 2.805), septic shock OR: 1.817 (1.307; 2.527) and APACHE II OR:1.054 (1.031; 1.077).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 000334 · p. 3

    Traditionally, carotid flow measurements are performed with the US probe oriented in the long-axis (LA) view.

    “Traditionally, carotid flow measurements are performed with the US probe oriented in the longaxis (LA) view [1].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] [1] W. Lee, General principles of carotid Doppler ultrasonography, Ultrasonography, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 11-17, 2014. - 2) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 000334 · p. 3

    Preliminary research showed that the RT view was more robust to motion and less operator-dependent than the LA view.

    “Regarding velocity measurements, preliminary research showed that the RT view was more robust to motion and less operator-dependent than the LA view [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] [3] L. van Knippenberg, An angle-independent cross-sectional Doppler method for flow estimation in the common carotid artery, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1513-1524, 2020. - 4) This work was supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) [grant number 17878]. Topic: Cardiovascular issues in ICU. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 000334 · p. 3

    Normality was checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test.

    “Normality was checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test and Friedman tests showed no statistically significant difference between the views for either the median (p = 0.142) or spread (p = 0.786) of systolic diameter per 30 s acquisition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
3 of 3
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The carotid artery has a circular cross-section and a parabolic flow profile.

    “Assuming a circular cross-section of the vessel and a parabolic flow profile, the probe should be properly positioned along the mid-axis to obtain an accurate blood flow estimation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Both vessel diameter and blood velocity are needed to compute blood flow in a vessel.

    “Both vessel diameter and blood velocity are needed to compute blood flow in a vessel.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Obtaining and maintaining the mid-axis parallel view is difficult.

    “However, obtaining and maintaining this mid-axis parallel view is difficult and literature describes that operator experience may impact the reliability of carotid flow measurements [2].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The short-axis view allows for measurement of the true diameter.

    “While the short-axis (SA) view allows for measurement of the true diameter, it does not allow for velocity estimation as the Doppler frequency shift approaches 0 degrees.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The rotating and tilting view is easier to visualize and assess for sonographers.

    “Another way of assessing the cross-section of the carotid artery is by rotating and tilting (RT) the probe, a view that is easier to visualize and assess for sonographers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no literature regarding clinical diameter estimates with the RT view.

    “To our knowledge, there is no literature regarding clinical diameter estimates with the RT view.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Selective digestive decontamination has been associated with reduced ICU mortality and acquired infection rates.

    “Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) has been associated with a reducution in mortality and ICU-acquired infection (NI) rates”
    “Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) has been associated with reduced ICU mortality and acquired infection rates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Recognition of risk factors for mortality and early intervention with appropriate administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials in patients with NI can significantly improve outcomes.

    “Recognition of risk factors for mortality and early intervention with appropriate administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials in patients with nosocomial infection (NI) can significantly improve outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Currently used hemodynamic monitoring techniques are invasive and related with catheter-related complications.

    “Hemodynamic monitoring is of utmost importance when treating critically ill patients, but the currently used techniques are invasive and related with catheter-related complications.”
9 of 9

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Scheduled-surgery percentage does not match the SDD group size

    Minor

    Table 1 reports 91 scheduled-surgery admissions among 780 SDD patients, or 11.7%, rather than 13.6%.

    Reported 13.6 · recomputed 11.666667

  • SDD admission categories do not total the stated group size

    Minor

    The three admission-category counts in Table 1 add to 765, although its SDD column is labeled N=780; no missing-admission category is shown.

    Reported 780 · recomputed 765

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pastore, G., Graziano, F., Robba, C., Sivero, M., Mulazzani, F., Noè, B., Consonni, M., Colombo, E., Abate, M., Savo, D., Quaranta, C., & Citerio, G.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Published
2023-10-24
Volume
11
Issue
S1
Pages
72-72
ISSN
2197-425X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387892992
Cited by
14
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0317-20045)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
carotid ultrasound, carotid artery diameter, probe orientation, long-axis view, short-axis view, measurement robustness, hemodynamic monitoring, cardiac surgery patients, Doppler ultrasound, intensive care monitoring, operator dependence, motion robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-19.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-19.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review