Cited by 197Digital Transformation in Financial ServicesFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceBanking Sector Performance and Management

The transition from traditional banking to mobile internet finance: an organizational innovation perspective - a comparative study of Citibank and ICBC

Open access
Chen, Zhuming, Li, Yushan, Wu, Yawen, Luo, Junjun·2017·Financial Innovation

Abstract

The development of Financial Technology (FinTech) in areas such as mobile Internet, cloud computing, big data, search engines, and blockchain technology have significantly changed the financial industry. FinTech is expected to overturn the traditional banking business model, forcing banks to upgrade and transform. This study adopts a comparative case study method to contrast and analyze the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) and Citibank. It analyzes the strategies, organizations, HR systems, and product innovations adopted by these two banks in response to the impact of FinTech. This paper proposes an “electric vehicle” mode for ICBC and an “airplane mode” for Citibank. Further, it describes the difficulties encountered by the Chinese banking industry and proposes some feasible ways to upgrade. “Technology power” will become the core competitive concept for the financial institutions of the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40854-017-0062-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chen Z, Zhu H, Guo Q (2016) Research on Mobile Internet Banking Organizational Innovation(Chinese). Outstanding paper of the 14th International Academic Conference on Financial Systems Engineering and Risk Management (FSERM'2016) 8, Harbin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Z., Li, Y., Wu, Y., & Luo, J.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Zhuming
Venue
Financial Innovation
Published
2017-07-24
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2199-4730 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739032854
Cited by
197
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
25.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Financial Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
the Advanced Institute of Finance, SunYat-sen University (531-541009)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Banking Sector Performance and Management
Keywords
fintech, conventional banks, bank transformation, organizational innovation, Citibank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, human resource management, product innovation, competitive advantage, Chinese banking sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review