CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TWI computation: a comparison of different open source GISs

Mattivi, Pietro, Franci, Francesca, Lambertini, Alessandro, Bitelli, Gabriele·2019·Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards
DOI 10.1186/s40965-019-0066-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40965-019-0066-y

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Ågren AM, Lidberg W, Strömgren M, Ogilvie J, Arp PA. Evaluating digital terrain indices for soil wetness mapping–a Swedish case study. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2014;18(9):3623–34. · DOI
  2. Bauer J, Rohdenburg H, Bork HR. Ein Digitales Reliefmodell Als Vorraussetzung Für Ein Deterministisches Modell Der Wasser-Und Stoff-Flüsse. Landschaftsgenese Und Landschaftsökologie. 1985;10:1–15.
  3. Böhner J, Selige T. Spatial prediction of soil attributes using terrain analysis and climate regionalisation. In: Göttinger Geogr. SAGA-Analyses and Modelling Applications; 2006. Abh, no. 115.
  4. Brovelli MA, Mitasova H, Neteler M, Raghavan V. Free and open source desktop and web Gis solutions. Applied Geomatics. 2012;4(2):65–6. · DOI
  5. Cohen JM, Ernst KC, Lindblade KA, Vulule JM, John CC, Wilson ML. Local topographic wetness indices predict household malaria risk better than land-use and land-cover in the Western Kenya highlands. Malar J. 2010;9(1):328. · DOI
  6. Conrad O, Bechtel B, Bock M, Dietrich H, Fischer E, Gerlitz L, Wehberg J, Wichmann V, Böhner J. System for automated geoscientific analyses (Saga) V. 2.1. 4. Geosci Model Dev. 2015;8(7):1991–2007. · DOI
  7. Costa-Cabral MC, Burges SJ. Digital elevation model networks (Demon): a model of flow over hillslopes for computation of contributing and dispersal areas. Water Resour Res. 1994;30(6):1681–92. · DOI
  8. Erskine RH, Green TR, Ramirez JA, MacDonald LH. Comparison of grid-based algorithms for computing upslope contributing area. Water Resour Res. 2006;42(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004648 . · DOI
  9. Evans IS. An integrated system of terrain analysis and slope mapping. Zeitschrift Fur Geomorphologie. 1980;36:274–95.
  10. Fairfield J, Leymarie P. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res. 1991;27(5):709–17. · DOI
  11. Freeman TG. Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid. Comput Geosci. 1991;17(3):413–22. · DOI
  12. Gruber S, Peckham S. Land-surface parameters and objects in hydrology. Dev Soil Sci. 2009;33:171–94.
  13. Haralick RM. Ridge and valley detection on digital images. Comput Vis Graph Image Process. 1983;22(1):48–38. · DOI
  14. Heerdegen RG, Beran MA. Quantifying source areas through land surface curvature and shape. J Hydrol. 1982;57(3–4):359–73. · DOI
  15. Higginbottom TP, Field CD, Rosenburgh AE, Wright A, Symeonakis E, Caporn SJM. High-resolution wetness index mapping: a useful tool for regional scale wetland management. Ecol Inform. 2018;48(November):89–96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.08.003 . · DOI
  16. Horn BKP. Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proc IEEE. 1981;69(1):14–47. · DOI
  17. Jolma A, Ames DP, Horning N, Mitasova H, Neteler M, Racicot A, Sutton T. Chapter ten free and open source geospatial tools for environmental modelling and management. Dev Integr Environ Assess. 2008;3:163–80. · DOI
  18. Khandve P, Mokadam AM. Application of GIS in environmental engineering. In: Proceedings of National Conference on environment pollution and management. Aurangabad; 2011. p. 244–50. ISBN: 978 81 90495 8 8.
  19. Kopecký M, Čížková Š. Using topographic wetness index in vegetation ecology: does the algorithm matter? Appl Veg Sci. 2010;13(4):450–9. · DOI
  20. Lea NL. An aspect driven kinematic routing algorithm. In: Overland Flow: Hydraulics and Erosion Mechanics, vol. 147; 1992. p. 175.
  21. Lindsay JB. Whitebox gat: a case study in Geomorphometric analysis. Comput Geosci. 2016;95:75–84. · DOI
  22. Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Peterson GA. Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1993;57(2):443–52. · DOI
  23. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process. 1991;5(1):3–30. · DOI
  24. Neteler M, Bowman MH, Landa M, Metz M. GRASS Gis: a multi-purpose open source Gis. Environ Model Softw. 2012;31:124–30. · DOI
  25. Neteler M, Mitasova H. Open source software and GIS. In: Open source Gis. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2008. p. 1–6. · DOI
  26. O’Callaghan JF, Mark DM. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Comput Vis Graph Image Process. 1984;28(3):323–44. · DOI
  27. Planchon O, Darboux F. A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depressions of digital elevation models. Catena. 2002;46(2–3):159–76. · DOI
  28. Pourali SH, Arrowsmith C, Chrisman N, Matkan AA, Mitchell D. Topography wetness index application in flood-risk-based land use planning. Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2016;9(1):39–54. · DOI
  29. Qin C-Z, Zhu A-X, Pei T, Li B-L, Scholten T, Behrens T, Zhou C-H. An approach to computing topographic wetness index based on maximum downslope gradient. Precis Agric. 2011;12(1):32–43. · DOI
  30. Quinn PFBJ, Beven K, Chevallier P, Planchon O. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol Process. 1991;5(1):59–79. · DOI
  31. Seibert J, McGlynn BL. A new triangular multiple flow direction algorithm for computing upslope areas from gridded digital elevation models. Water Resour Res. 2007;43(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005128 . · DOI
  32. Schmidt F, Persson A. Comparison of DEM data capture and topographic wetness indices. Precis Agric. 2003;4(2):179–92. · DOI
  33. Steiniger S, Bocher E. An overview on current free and open source desktop Gis developments. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2009;23(10):1345–70. · DOI
  34. Steiniger S, Hunter AJS. The 2012 free and open source Gis software map–a guide to facilitate research, development, and adoption. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2013;39:136–50. · DOI
  35. Tarboton DG. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res. 1997;33(2):309–19. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Tian B. GIS technology applications in environmental and earth sciences. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016. · DOI
  37. Travis MR, Elsner GH, Iverson WD, Johnson CG. VIEWIT: computation of seen areas, slope, and aspect for land-use planning, vol. 70. Berkeley: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture; 1975. p. 11. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-11
  38. Wang L, Liu H. An efficient method for identifying and filling surface depressions in digital elevation models for hydrologic analysis and modelling. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2006;20(2):193–213. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Western AW, Grayson RB, Blöschl G, Willgoose GR, McMahon TA. Observed spatial Organization of Soil Moisture and its Relation to terrain indices. Water Resour Res. 1999;35(3):797–810. · DOI
  40. Zevenbergen LW, Thorne CR. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surf Process Landf. 1987;12(1):47–56. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Metadata

Authors
Mattivi, P., Franci, F., Lambertini, A., & Bitelli, G.
ORCID
Mattivi, Pietro
Venue
Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2363-7501
DOI
10.1186/s40965-019-0066-y
Cited by
151
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review