Cited by 105Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and AccessMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Positive postpartum depression screening practices and subsequent mental health treatment for low-income women in Western countries: a systematic literature review

Open access
Hansotte, Elinor, Payne, Shirley I., Babich, Suzanne M.·2017·Public Health Reviews

Abstract

PROBLEM STATEMENT AND SIGNIFICANCE: Left undiagnosed and/or untreated, the short-and long-term sequelae of postpartum depression may negatively impact both mother and child. In Western countries, access to mental health care is influenced by socioeconomic factors. The objective of this systematic literature review is to compile factors that hinder and improve access to postpartum depression treatment in low-income women after a positive screen for postpartum depression. The key question of focus is: what are the characteristics associated with access to mental health treatment for low-income women with a positive postpartum depression screen in Western countries? METHODS: A PRISMA-based systematic literature review was conducted of studies published in English before February 2016 that looked at treatment for postpartum depression in low-income women who had been identified with the condition. PubMed and EBSCO databases were searched using MESH and key terms and found 100 articles that met the selection criteria. After review by two independent researchers, 18 studies with 17 unique populations were included in the literature review. RESULTS: Two independent abstractors searched the included articles for themes surrounding impediments and advantages for low-income women identified with postpartum depression in obtaining mental health treatment. Characteristics of successful mental health treatment included studies that employed the use of a home visitor and those that separated outcomes for women with previous mental health treatment. Themes that emerged as treatment obstacles included cultural barriers, physical barriers, systemic health care barriers, and social barriers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review will help to better inform screening and treatment priorities for those in the medical field who may encounter women experiencing postpartum depression and are not aware of the various barriers to care specific to low-income women. This review will also help policymakers identify specific obstacles that are not addressed in postpartum screening mandate policies which can affect the implementation of these policies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40985-017-0050-y

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marginalized populations with limited resources are at increased risk for perinatal mental health conditions.

    “Attendance is lower among marginalized populations who may have limited resources [64, 65]; these populations are also at increased risk for perinatal mental health conditions [9, 66].”

    From Factors associated with postpartum depression symptoms following antepartum hospitalization (2026) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Background reports that women living in poverty have postpartum depression two to four times as often as middle- or upper-income women, and identifies racial and ethnic minorities among those disproportionately at risk. This supports the claim for postpartum depression, but the source does not establish increased risk across perinatal mental health conditions generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansotte, E., Payne, S. I., & Babich, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Hansotte, Elinor
Venue
Public Health Reviews
Published
2017-01-31
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
  • 0301-0422 (ISSN-L)
  • 2107-6952
OpenAlex
W2585240890
Cited by
105
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Public health reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publisher
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
postpartum depression, postpartum depression screening, low-income women, access to mental health care, barriers to care, home visiting, cultural barriers, socioeconomic factors, Western countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review