The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility
Open accessAbstract
There is a long and varied history associated with the evolution of the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). However, a historical review is missing in the academic literature that portrays the evolution of the academic understanding of the concept alongside with the public and international events that influenced the social expectations with regards to corporate behavior. The aim of this paper is to provide a distinctive historical perspective on the evolution of CSR as a conceptual paradigm by reviewing the most relevant factors that have shaped its understanding and definition, such as academic contributions, international policies and significant social and political events. To do so, the method used is a comprehensive literature review that explores the most relevant academic contributions and public events that have influenced the evolutionary process of CSR and how they have done so. The findings show that the understanding of corporate responsibility has evolved from being limited to the generation of profit to include a broader set of responsibilities to the latest belief that the main responsibility of companies should be the generation of shared value. The findings also indicate that as social expectations of corporate behavior changed, so did the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility. The findings suggest that CSR continues to be relevant within the academic literature and can be expected to remain part of the business vocabulary at least in the short term and as a result, the authors present a plausible future for CSR that takes into consideration its historical evolution. Finally, this paper gives way for future academic research to explore how CSR can help address the latest social expectations of generating shared value as a main business objective, which in turn may have practical implications if CSR is implemented with this in mind.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529 · cited 1×
“Friedman would further explore this notion in the article The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits published in (Friedman 1970) in which he sees CSR activities as an inappropriate use of company’s resources that would result in the unjustifiable spending of money for the general social interest.”
BackgroundA Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Carroll, A. B. (1991) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-g · Cited by 9,036
Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition
Friedman, M. (2002) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226264189.001.0001 · Cited by 8,225
Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987 · Cited by 7,567
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145
Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct
Carroll, A. B. (1999) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765039903800303 · Cited by 6,316
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341
Corporate Social Performance Revisited
Wood, D. J. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258977 · Cited by 5,093
Cited by
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Abdalla, S., Mogaji, E., Elbanna, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102759 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility
- Published
- 2019-01-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2366-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 2366-0074
- OpenAlex
- W2924255155
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 119.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
- The paper
- Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.