Cited by 7Memory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Music PerceptionDiverse Music Education Insights

Optimizing song retention through the spacing effect

Open access
Katz, Joel J., Ando, Momo, Wiseheart, Melody·2021·Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Abstract

The spacing effect refers to the improvement in memory retention for materials learned in a series of sessions, as opposed to massing learning in a single session. It has been extensively studied in the domain of verbal learning using word lists. Less evidence is available for connected discourse or tasks requiring the complex coordination of verbal and other domains. In particular, the effect of spacing on the retention of words and music in song has yet to be determined. In this study, university students were taught an unaccompanied two-verse song based on traditional materials to a criterion of 95% correct memory for sung words. Subsequent training sessions were either massed or spaced by two days or one week and tested at a retention interval of three weeks. Performances were evaluated for number of correct and incorrect syllables, number of correctly and incorrectly pitched notes, degree notes were off-pitch, and number of hesitations while singing. The data revealed strong evidence for a spacing effect for song between the massed and spaced conditions at a retention interval of three weeks, and evidence of no difference between the two spaced conditions. These findings suggest that the ongoing cues offered by surface features in the song are strong enough to enable verbatim recall across spaced conditions, as long as the spacing interval reaches a critical threshold.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41235-021-00345-7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A distinctive methodological feature is the rigorous use of delayed post-tests, ranging from two weeks to one year, serving as the primary indicator of internal validity for long-term memory consolidation.

    “A distinctive methodological feature is the rigorous use of delayed post-tests, ranging from two weeks to one year, serving as the primary indicator of internal validity for long-term memory (LTM) consolidation rather than transitory performance”

    From Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Neurodidactic Spaced Learning Strategies in Long-Term Memory (2026) · cites this paper as Katz et al., 2021

    The Method > Design section reports a delayed final test three weeks after review, with word and note accuracy at that test used as outcome measures. It does not report post-tests ranging from two weeks to one year or describe delayed testing as the primary indicator of internal validity for long-term memory consolidation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The use of MMAT revealed a generally high level of internal validity in studies employing advanced neurophysiological markers or high-impact academic assessments.

    “The use of MMAT added an additional layer of methodological calibration, revealing a generally high level of internal validity in studies employing advanced neurophysiological markers (e.g., EEG, standardized performance metrics) (Feng et al., 2019;Katz et al., 2021;Katz & Wiseheart, 2025) or high-impact academic assessments (Gilbert et al., 2023;Burel et al., 2025;Azim et al., 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Atchley RM Hare ML Memory for poetry: More than meaning? International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 2013 4 1 35 50 26401226 PMC4577018
  2. Bell MC Kawadri N Simone PM Wiseheart M Long-term memory, sleep, and the spacing effect Memory 2014 22 3 276 283 10.1080/09658211.2013.778294 23521365 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bjork RA Druckman D Bjork RA Institutional impediments to effective training Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance 1994 National Academy Press 295 306
  4. Carpenter SK Cepeda NJ Rohrer D Kang SH Pashler H Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction Educational Psychology Review 2012 24 3 369 378 10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cash CD Effects of early and late rest intervals on performance and overnight consolidation of a keyboard sequence Journal of Research in Music Education 2009 57 3 252 266 10.1177/0022429409343470 · DOI
  6. Chaffin, R., Demos, A. P., & Logan, T. R. (2015). Performing from memory. In S. Hallam, I. Cross, & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (2nd ed. online). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198722946.013.34 · DOI
  7. Chaffin R Imreh G Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory Psychological Science 2002 13 4 342 349 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00462.x 12137137 · DOI
  8. Creighton, H., & Senior, D. H. (1950). Traditional songs from Nova Scotia. Ryerson Press.
  9. Flesch R A new readability yardstick Journal of Applied Psychology 1948 32 3 221 233 10.1037/h0057532 18867058 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ginsborg, J., & Chaffin, R. (2007). The effect of retrieval cues developed during practice and rehearsal on an expert singer’s long-term recall for words and melody. In A. Williamon & D. Coimbra (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science 2007 (pp. 167–172). Association Européenne des Conservatoires, Académies de Musique et Musikhochschulen.
  11. Ginsborg J Sloboda JA Singers' recall for the words and melody of a new, unaccompanied song Psychology of Music 2007 35 3 421 440 10.1177/0305735607072654 · DOI
  12. Glover JA Corkill AJ Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect Journal of Educational Psychology 1987 79 2 198 10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.198 · DOI
  13. Gunning R The technique of clear writing (revised edition) 1971 McGraw Hill
  14. Halpern AR Memory for the absolute pitch of familiar songs Memory & Cognition 1989 17 5 572 581 10.3758/BF03197080 2796742 · DOI
  15. Halpern AR Müllensiefen D Effects of timbre and tempo change on memory for music Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008 61 9 1371 1384 10.1080/17470210701508038 19086302 · DOI
  16. Halpern AR O'Connor MG Implicit memory for music in Alzheimer's disease Neuropsychology 2000 14 3 391 397 10.1037/0894-4105.14.3.391 10928742 · DOI
  17. Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Jr., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8–75. Naval Technical Training Command. 10.21236/ADA006655 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Krug D Davis TB Glover JA Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? Journal of Educational Psychology 1990 82 2 366 10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.366 · DOI
  19. Lea RB Rapp DN Elfenbein A Mitchel AD Romine RS Sweet silent thought: Alliteration and resonance in poetry comprehension Psychological Science 2008 19 7 709 716 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02146.x 18727787 · DOI
  20. Lindsey, R., Mozer, M. C., Cepeda, N. J., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing memory retention with cognitive models. In A. Howes, D. Peebles, & R. Cooper (Eds.) In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on cognitive modeling (ICCM).
  21. Lockhart RS Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding Memory 2002 10 5–6 397 403 10.1080/09658210244000225 12396652 · DOI
  22. Mozer, M. C., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N., Lindsey, R., & Vul, E. (2009). Predicting the optimal spacing of study: A multiscale context model of memory. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, & J. D. Lafferty (Eds.), NIPS’09: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on neural information processing systems (pp. 1321–1329). Curran Associates Inc. 10.1037/e520562012-290 · DOI
  23. Noice H Noice T Long-term retention of theatrical roles Memory 1999 7 3 357 382 10.1080/096582199387977 10659083 · DOI
  24. Pashler H Rohrer D Cepeda NJ Carpenter SK Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007 14 2 187 193 10.3758/BF03194050 17694899 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Purnell-Webb P Speelman CP Effects of music on memory for text Perceptual and Motor Skills 2008 106 3 927 957 10.2466/pms.106.3.927-957 18712216 · DOI
  26. Rapp DN Samuel AG A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002 28 3 564 571 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.564 12018508 · DOI
  27. Rawson KA Why do rereading lag effects depend on test delay? Journal of Memory and Language 2012 66 4 870 884 10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.004 · DOI
  28. Rawson KA Kintsch W Rereading effects depend on time of test Journal of Educational Psychology 2005 97 1 70 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70 · DOI
  29. Rubin DC Very long-term memory for prose and verse Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1977 16 5 611 621 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80023-6 · DOI
  30. Rubin DC Memory in oral traditions: The cognitive psychology of epic, ballads, and counting-out rhymes 1995 Oxford University Press
  31. Rubin DC The basic-systems model of episodic memory Perspectives on Psychological Science 2006 1 4 277 311 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00017.x 26151796 · DOI
  32. Rubin DC Rahhal TA Poon LW Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best Memory & Cognition 1998 26 1 3 19 10.3758/BF03211366 9519693 · DOI
  33. Rubin DC Wallace WT Rhyme and reason: Analyses of dual retrieval cues Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989 15 4 698 709 10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.698 · DOI
  34. Rubin DC Wallace WT Houston BC The beginnings of expertise for ballads Cognitive Science 1993 17 3 435 462 10.1207/s15516709cog1703_4 · DOI
  35. Rubin-Rabson G Studies in the psychology of memorizing piano music: II. A comparison of massed and distributed practice Journal of Educational Psychology 1940 31 4 270 284 10.1037/h0061174 · DOI
  36. Sachs JS Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse Perception & Psychophysics 1967 2 9 437 442 10.3758/BF03208784 · DOI
  37. Schlemmer, K. (2002). Absolute memory for melody: A study with choir singers. In C. Stevens (Ed). In ICMPC7: 7th international conference on music perception & cognition; conference proceedings (pp. 514–517). Causal Productions.
  38. Stambaugh LA When repetition isn’t the best practice strategy: Effects of blocked and random practice schedules Journal of Research in Music Education 2011 58 4 368 383 10.1177/0022429410385945 · DOI
  39. Stambaugh LA Demorest SM Effects of practice schedule on wind instrument performance: A preliminary application of a motor learning principle Update Applications of Research in Music Education 2010 28 2 20 28 10.1177/8755123310361768 · DOI
  40. Tillmann B Dowling WJ Memory decreases for prose, but not for poetry Memory & Cognition 2007 35 4 628 639 10.3758/BF03193301 17848021 · DOI
  41. Verkoeijen PP Rikers RM Özsoy B Distributed rereading can hurt the spacing effect in text memory Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008 22 5 685 695 10.1002/acp.1388 · DOI
  42. Wallace, W. T., & Rubin, D. C. (1988b). “The wreck of the old 97”: A real event remembered in song. In U. Neisser & E. Winograd (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory (pp. 283–310). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511664014.012 · DOI
  43. Wallace, W. T., & Rubin, D. C. (1988a). Memory of a ballad singer. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1. Memory in everyday life (pp. 257–262). John Wiley & Sons.
  44. Wallace WT Memory for music: Effect of melody on recall of text Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994 20 6 1471 1485 10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1471 · DOI
  45. Wallace WT Rubin DC Characteristics and constraints in ballads and their effects on memory Discourse Processes 1991 14 2 181 202 10.1080/01638539109544781 · DOI
  46. Wiseheart, M., Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., Weston, T., Kim, A. S. N., Kapler, I. V., & Foot, V. (2019). Enhancing the quality of student learning using distributed practice. In J. Dunlosky & K. Rawson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 550–584). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108235631.023 · DOI
  47. Wiseheart M D’Souza AA Chae J Lack of spacing effects during piano learning PLoS ONE 2017 12 8 e0182986 10.1371/journal.pone.0182986 28800631 PMC5553926 · DOI
  48. Zentner M Strauss H Assessing musical ability quickly and objectively: Development and validation of the Short-PROMS and the Mini-PROMS Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2017 1400 1 33 45 10.1111/nyas.13410 28704888 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, J. J., Ando, M., & Wiseheart, M.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Wiseheart, Melody
Venue
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Published
2021-12
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
79-79
ISSN
2365-7464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200590205
Cited by
7
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2020-1256)
  • York University Faculty of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
Keywords
spacing effect, spaced learning, massed learning, verbal learning, music memory, verbatim recall, pitch accuracy, retention interval, surface features
MeSH terms
Cues, Humans, Learning, Memory, Mental Recall, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review