Cited by 4Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Judging the credibility of websites: an effectiveness trial of the spacing effect in the elementary classroom

Open access
Foot-Seymour, Vanessa, Wiseheart, Melody·2022·Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Abstract

Spaced learning—the spacing effect—is a cognitive phenomenon whereby memory for to-be-learned material is better when a fixed amount of study time is spread across multiple learning sessions instead of crammed into a more condensed time period. The spacing effect has been shown to be effective across a wide range of ages and learning materials, but few studies have been conducted that look at whether spacing can be effective in real-world classrooms, using real curriculum content, with real teachers leading the intervention. In the current study, lesson plans for teaching website credibility were distributed to homeroom elementary teachers with specific instructions on how to manipulate the timing of the lessons for either a one-per-day or one-per-week delivery. One month after the final lesson, students were asked to apply their knowledge on a final test, where they evaluated two new websites. Results were mixed, suggesting that classroom noise might lessen or impede researchers’ ability to find spacing effects in naturalistic settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41235-022-00358-w

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies aiming to improve students' critical thinking had the additional complexity of explicitly asking students to transfer or apply information to completely new situations.

    “Moreover, the studies aiming to improve students’ critical thinking (i.e., Foot-Seymour et al., 2019; Foot-Seymour & Wiseheart, 2022) had the additional complexity of explicitly asking students to transfer or apply information to completely new situations.”

    From The Distributed Practice Effect on Classroom Learning: A Meta-Analytic Review of Applied Research (2025) · cites this paper as Foot-Seymour & Wiseheart, 2022

    The Method (Procedure; page not provided) says students applied the website-evaluation categories to two websites on the final test, supporting the claim that they used what they learned on new examples. The task remained website evaluation, however, so the paper does not establish transfer to completely new kinds of situations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Except for studies applying distributed practice to critical thinking, distributed practice is yet to be widely applied to 21st-century skills learning.

    “except for the studies applying distributed practice to critical thinking (Foot-Seymour et al., 2019; Foot-Seymour & Wiseheart, 2022), distributed practice is yet to be widely applied to 21st-century skills learning.”

    From The Distributed Practice Effect on Classroom Learning: A Meta-Analytic Review of Applied Research (2025) · cites this paper as Foot-Seymour & Wiseheart, 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Abrami PC Bernard RM Borokhovski E Wade A Surkes M Tamim R Zhang DA Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis Review of Educational Research 2008 78 4 1102 1134 10.3102/0034654308326084 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Angeli C Valanides N Instructional effects on critical thinking: Performance on ill-defined issues Learning and Instruction 2009 19 4 322 334 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.010 · DOI
  3. Bronstein, D. M. (2007). The efficacy of a web site evaluation checklist as a pedagogical approach for teaching students to critically evaluate internet content (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences Nova Southeastern University.
  4. Butler AC Marsh EJ Slavinsky JP Baraniuk RG Integrating cognitive science and technology improves learning in a STEM Classroom Educational Psychology Review 2014 26 2 331 340 10.1007/s10648-014-9256-4 · DOI
  5. Dempster FN Bjork EL Bjork RL Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice Memory 1996 Academic Press 317 344
  6. DeRemer P D’Agostino PR Locus of distributed lag effect in free recall Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1974 13 2 167 171 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80041-1 · DOI
  7. Ennis RH Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision Topoi 2018 37 165 184 10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4 · DOI
  8. Foot-Seymour V Foot J Wiseheart M Judging credibility: Can spaced lessons help students think more critically online? Applied Cognitive Psychology 2019 33 6 1032 1043 10.1002/acp.3539 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Harden RM What is a spiral curriculum? Medical Teacher 1999 21 2 141 143 10.1080/01421599979752 21275727 · DOI
  10. Jarosz AF Wiley J What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors Journal of Problem Solving 2014 7 1 1 8 10.7771/1932-6246.1167 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Küpper-Tetzel CE Erdfelder E Dickhauser O The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students' memory for vocabulary Instructional Science 2014 42 373 388 10.1007/s11251-013-9285-2 · DOI
  12. Kuhn D A developmental model of critical thinking Educational Researcher 1999 28 2 16 46 10.3102/0013189X028002016 · DOI
  13. Maddox GB Understanding the underlying mechanism of the spacing effect in verbal learning: A case for encoding variability and study-phase retrieval Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2016 28 6 684 706 10.1080/20445911.2016.1181637 · DOI
  14. Manning-Oullette A Black KM Learning leadership: A qualitative study on the differences of student learning in online versus traditional courses in a leadership studies program Journal of Leadership Education 2017 16 2 59 79 10.12806/V16/I2/R4 · DOI
  15. Moss, V. D. (1995). The efficacy of massed versus distributed practice as a function of desired learning outcomes and grade level of the student (Publication no. 9603493) [Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  16. Ni AY Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods Journal of Public Affairs Education 2013 9 2 199 215 10.1080/15236803.2013.12001730 · DOI
  17. Picciano AG Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2002 6 1 21 40 10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Rawson KA Kintsch W Rereading effects depend on time of test Journal of Educational Psychology 2005 97 1 70 80 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70 · DOI
  19. Rea CP Modigliani V The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications 1985 4 1 11 18
  20. Reder LM Anderson JR Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for the main points of a text Memory & Cognition 1982 10 2 97 102 10.3758/BF03209210 7087784 · DOI
  21. Reed HB Distributed practice in addition Journal of Educational Psychology 1924 15 4 248 249 10.1037/h0070683 · DOI
  22. Reiken CJ Dotson WH Carter SL Griffith AK An evaluation of interteaching in an asynchronous online graduate-level behavior analysis course Teaching of Psychology 2018 45 3 264 269 10.1177/0098628318779275 · DOI
  23. Rohrer D Research commentary: The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2009 40 1 4 17 10.5951/jresematheduc.40.1.0004 · DOI
  24. Rouder JN Morey RD Speckman PL Province JM Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2012 56 5 356 374 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Rovee-Collier C Evancio S Earley LA The time window hypothesis: Spacing effects Infant Behavior and Development 1995 18 1 69 78 10.1016/0163-6383(95)90008-X · DOI
  26. Siegel H Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education 1988 Routledge
  27. Simone PM Bell MC Cepeda NJ Diminished but not forgotten: Effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits The Journals of Gerontology Series b: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2013 68 5 674 680 10.1093/geronb/gbs096 23103383 · DOI
  28. Taraban R Rynearson K Stalcup KA Time as a variable in learning on the world-wide web Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2001 33 2 217 225 10.3758/BF03195368 11447675 · DOI
  29. Toppino TC Gerbier E Ross BH About practice: Repetition, spacing, and abstraction Psychology of learning and motivation 2014 Academic Press 113 189
  30. Verkoeijen PPJL Rikers RMJP Özsoy B Distributed rereading can hurt the spacing effect in text memory Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008 22 5 685 695 10.1002/acp.1388 · DOI
  31. Vlach HA Sandhofer CM Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children’s acquisition and generalization of science concepts Child Development 2012 83 4 1137 1144 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01781.x 22616822 PMC3399982 · DOI
  32. Wiseheart M Küpper-Tezel C Weston T Kim ASN Kapler IV Foot-Seymour V Dunlosky J Rawson K Enhancing the quality of student learning using distributed practice Cambridge handbook of cognition and education 2019 Cambridge University Press 550 584
  33. Zechmeister EB Shaughnessy JJ When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1980 15 1 41 44 10.3758/BF03329756 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foot-Seymour, V., & Wiseheart, M.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Wiseheart, Melody
Venue
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Published
2022-01-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
5-5
ISSN
2365-7464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225739266
Cited by
4
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
social sciences and humanities research council of Canada (435-2020-1256)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
spacing effect, spaced learning, website credibility, information literacy, elementary school students, classroom intervention, memory retention, classroom noise
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Humans, Learning, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review