Cited by 102Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: Long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning

Kapler, Irina V., Weston, Tina, Wiseheart, Melody·2015·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Kapler, Irina V.
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
36
Pages
38-45
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982013428
Cited by
101
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • York University Faculty Association
  • York University Faculty of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
spacing effect, undergraduate students, factual knowledge, higher-order learning, application questions, long-term retention, natural sciences curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review