Cited by 184Memory Processes and InfluencesSecond Language Acquisition and LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Spacing effects in real‐world classroom vocabulary learning

Sobel, Hailey S., Cepeda, Nicholas J., Kapler, Irina V.·2011·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

As a primary goal, educators often strive to maximize the amount of information pupils remember. In the lab, psychologists have found efficient memory strategies for retaining school‐related materials. One such strategy is the spacing effect, a memory advantage that occurs when learning is distributed across time instead of crammed into a single study session. Spaced learning is not often explicitly utilized in actual classrooms, perhaps due to a paucity of research in applied settings and with school‐aged children. The current study examined the spacing effect in real‐world fifth‐grade classrooms. We taught 39 children unfamiliar English words using both massed and spaced learning. Five weeks later, we tested vocabulary recall. One‐week spacing produced superior long‐term retention compared to massed learning. This finding demonstrates that the spacing effect can be generalized to vocabulary learning in applied settings and middle‐school‐aged children. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.1747

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spaced learning is more effective than massed learning for facts, concepts and lists, skill and motor learning, classroom education including science and vocabulary learning, and generalization of conceptual knowledge in children.

    “For example, spaced learning is more effective than massed learning for facts, concepts and lists2–4, skill learning and motor learning5,6, in classroom education (including science learning and vocabulary learning)7–9, and in generalization of conceptual knowledge in children10.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sobel, H. S., Cepeda, N. J., & Kapler, I. V.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cepeda, Nicholas J.
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-22
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
763-767
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W2069521020
Cited by
183
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
spacing effect, spaced learning, massed learning, vocabulary acquisition, long-term retention, memory strategies, fifth grade students, English vocabulary, classroom teaching, word recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review