The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
University students’ intentions to learn artificial intelligence: the roles of supportive environments and expectancy–value beliefs
Open accessAbstract
Despite the importance of artificial intelligence (AI) for university students to thrive in the future workplace, few studies have been conducted to assess and foster their intentions to learn AI. Guided by the situated expectancy–value theory, this study adopted both variable- and person-centered approaches to explore the role of supportive environments and expectancy–value beliefs in fostering university students’ intentions to learn AI. The data were drawn from 494 university students. In Study 1, the variable-centered approach of structural equation modeling showed the critical role of supportive environments and expectancy–value beliefs in promoting students’ intentions to learn AI. In Study 2, the person-centered approach of latent profile analysis identified three subgroups of students based on their levels of supportive environments and expectancy–value beliefs. Consistent with Study 1, students who perceived more supportive environments and higher levels of expectancy–value beliefs had stronger intentions to learn AI. We also documented the influence of study of field, gender, and year level on students' perceptions of supportive environments, expectancy-value beliefs and intentions to learn AI. The implications of these findings in improving students’ intentions to learn AI are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The educational efficacy of these tools varies substantially across disciplines due to varying knowledge structures, pedagogical approaches, and evaluation metrics6.”
From Integrating AI-generated content tools in higher education: a comparative analysis of interdisciplinary learning outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · cited 5×
“Our study provides evidence that both supportive environments and expectancy–value beliefs are crucial factors in fostering students’ intentions to learn AI, which is consistent with previous research (Kelly et al., 2023; Teo & Zhou, 2014; Venkatesh et al., 2003).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066 · cited 2×
“…gain more experience with technology, the influence of significant others is expected to diminish, with individuals relying more on their own past experiences to shape their perceptions of technology, rather than the opinions of others (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Venkatesh & Morris, 2000).”
BackgroundResultSensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
Chen, F. F. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701301834 · Cited by 12,217 · cited 1×
“According to the criteria recommended by Chen (2007), ΔCFI ≤ − 0.01, ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.015, and ΔSRMR ≤ 0.03 were the criteria for metric invariance, while ΔCFI ≤ − 0.01, ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.015, and ΔSRMR ≤ 0.01 were the criteria for scalar invariance.”
InfluentialA comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406 · cited 1×
“In addition to the direct effects, we also examined whether expectancy–value beliefs mediated the influence of supportive environments on intentions to learn AI via Sobel tests (MacKinnon et al., 2002).”
BackgroundExpectancy-value theory of achievement motivation
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 · Cited by 7,383 · cited 2×
“Existing research has indicated that students’ expectancy and value beliefs are domain-specific, demonstrating that high levels of expectancy and value beliefs in one subject may not necessarily translate to high levels in another subject (Wigfield & Eccles, 2000).”
BackgroundZawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · cited 2×
“However, existing research on AI education has mostly focused on the curriculum and technical aspects (Salas-Pilco & Yang, 2022; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).”
BackgroundStructural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications.
Smith, M. D., & Hoyle, R. H. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2988418 · Cited by 6,875
(1995) · Cited by 4,008
Predicting and Changing Behavior
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203838020 · Cited by 2,807
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250981 · Cited by 2,780 · cited 1×
“…gain more experience with technology, the influence of significant others is expected to diminish, with individuals relying more on their own past experiences to shape their perceptions of technology, rather than the opinions of others (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000; Venkatesh & Morris, 2000).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Yeung, S. S.., King, R. B., Nalipay, M. J. N., & Cai, Y. (2022). Exploring the interplay between socioeconomic status and reading achievement: An expectancy‐value perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 1196-1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.v92.3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4 · Cited by 192
“…widely studied in educational technology (e.g., Ifinedo, 2018) but often within general contexts such as AI learning intention (Chai et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023) or in non-GenAI settings, for example, AI-enabled automatic scoring applications (Fu et al., 2020) and AI teaching assistants (Kim…”
BackgroundFalebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2024) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-024-00132-1 · Cited by 154
“Undergraduates with a high degree of technological self-efficacy are more likely to explore new AI tools as they are released into the public domain (Kong et al., 2021; Obenza et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023).”
Conceptualising and cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in doctoral academic writing
Ou, A. W., Khuder, B., Franzetti, S., & Negretti, R. (2024) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101156 · Cited by 93
Molefi, R. R., Ayanwale, M. A., Kurata, L., & Chere-Masopha, J. (2024) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100191 · Cited by 125
Wang, K., Cui, W., & Xue, Y. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15020165 · Cited by 139
“Building upon this foundation, B. Wang et al. (2023) examined the intricate interplay between digital and AI technologies by leveraging Wilson et al.’s (2015) technological-cognitive-ethical model model alongside the KSAVE framework within the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) domain.”
Saihi, A., Ben-Daya, M., Hariga, M., & As'ad, R. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100274 · Cited by 75
Students-Generative AI interaction patterns and its impact on academic writing
Kim, J., Lee, S.-S., Detrick, R., Wang, J., & Li, N. (2025) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6 · Cited by 97
“Moreover, these students often display more positive emotions towards AI, recognizing its potential as a collaborative part - ner rather than a mere tool (Hew et al., 2023 ; Wang et al., 2023a, b ).”
Gupta, A., Atef, Y., Mills, A., & Bali, M. (2024) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.631 · Cited by 64
Chai, C. S., Yu, D., King, R. B., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241242188 · Cited by 69
“However, large-scale theory-driven studies on university students’ perceptions of learning AI seem to be lacking (Hornberger et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023).”
Self-citationIntegrating generative AI in university teaching and learning: A model for balanced guidelines
Cacho, R. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i3.4508 · Cited by 59
“Echoing this sentiment, Wang et al. (2023) maintain that students who perceive their learning contexts as more supportive are notably more eager to engage in AI-enhanced learning, illustrating the positive correlation between supportive educational environments and the willingness to adopt AI for…”
BackgroundYurt, E., & Kaşarcı, İ. (2024) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.725 · Cited by 76
“The Motivational Model of Eccles and Wigfield, 2002 (simplified) Guided by the situated expectancy–value theory, Wang et al. (2023) By identifying critical factors that promote or inhibit students’ intentions to learn AI, these studies aim to provide valuable insights for higher education…”
Liu, Y.-L. E., & Huang, Y.-M. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2311975 · Cited by 47
“…technologies not only gauges their value but also unveils their potential to address learning needs, underscoring the significance of factors that drive consistent adoption and influence uptake (Algerafi et al., 2023; Chan & Hu, 2023; Foroughi et al., 2023; Joshi et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023).”
Attitudes Towards AI: The Interplay of Self-Efficacy, Well-Being, and Competency
Naiseh, M., Babiker, A., Alshakhsi, S. A. A., Cemiloglu, D., Al‐Thani, D., Montag, C., & Ali, R. (2025) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00486-2 · Cited by 70
“Another concept closely linked to understanding the relationship between self-efficacy and individual attitudes towards AI is the level of competency individuals possess with AI (Naiseh & Shukla, 2023; Wang et al., 2023).”
The AI Motivation Scale (AIMS): a self-determination theory perspective
Li, J., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., Zhai, X., & Lee, V. W. Y. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2025.2478424 · Cited by 63
“To gauge the supportiveness of the environments for learning with AI, we adapted the scale by Wang et al. (2023).”
InfluentialSelf-citationWen, F., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., An, X., & Zou, Q. (2024) · Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange · doi:10.18785/jetde.1701.07 · Cited by 39
“Third, teachers need to educate students about the value of AI, which can positively influence students’ attitudes towards AI (Jatileni et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023), thereby reducing their AI anxiety and promoting their use behavior (Kwak et al., 2022).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStudents’ Intention toward Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Digital Transformation
Milićević, N., Kalaš, B., Djokić, N., Malčić, B. D., & Djokic, I. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16093554 · Cited by 54
Saatçi, G., Korkut, S., & Ünsal, A. (2024) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104186 · Cited by 31
Matobobo, C. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01116-6 · Cited by 34
“Despite both genders acknowledging the educational value of genAI [42], male students were more likely to act on these perceptions [19], a pattern supported by their perception of stronger institutional and social support [42].”
Wen, Y., Zhao, X., Li, X., & Zang, Y. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17031127 · Cited by 30
Modeling learners' behavioral intention toward using artificial intelligence in education
Valle, N. N., Kilat, R. V., Lim, J., General, E., Cruz, J. D., Colina, S. J., Batican, I., & Valle, L. C. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101167 · Cited by 30
Ninghardjanti, P., Umam, M. C., Subarno, A., Winarno, W., Langgi, N. R., & Widodo, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1719625 · Cited by 50
Kong, S. C., Zhu, J., & Yang, Y. N. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100359 · Cited by 28
Yan, W., Nakajima, T., & Sawada, R. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100465 · Cited by 50
Li, J., Zhang, J., Chai, C. S., Lee, V. W. Y., Zhai, X., Wang, X., & King, R. B. (2025) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-025-00339-w · Cited by 35
“Those who can access more resources related to AI exhibited higher levels of intrinsic motivation 43,46 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationYan, Z., & Qianjun, T. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-10941-y · Cited by 21
Eldakar, M. A. M., Shehata, A. M. K., & Ammar, A. S. A. (2025) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669251314859 · Cited by 33
“In the context of generative AI (GenAI), GenAI self-ef fi cacy is described as individuals ’ con fi dence in their capacity to use GenAI tools, such as ChatGPT, for academic and research reasons (Wang et al., 2023).”
Huang, T., & Wu, C. (2025) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100275 · Cited by 38
Xiaohong, L., Zhang, J., Xiaoming, C., & Beina, Z. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2343752 · Cited by 21
Bond, M. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00492-z · Cited by 27
“• Involve a wider range of stakeholders, including students, teachers, administrators and policymakers in the research process (e.g., Chan & Hu, 2023; Wang et al., 2023). g., Banihashem et al., 2024).”
Jaén, J. M. S., León-Gómez, A., Martínez, M. D. C. V., & Muñoz, V. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13712-4 · Cited by 17
“…learning from high-performing AI-driven businesses fos - ters learning behaviors among students, enhancing professional readiness, while Expectancy-Value Theory underscores the motivational pull of perceived profes - sional gains from AI integration (Schunk, 2020; Wang et al., 2023a, b).”
Abreh, M. K., Arthur, F., Akwetey, F. A., & Nortey, S. A. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00466-8 · Cited by 19
“International organisations such as the OECD, UNESCO, and UNICEF have highlighted the importance of equipping the 21st-century workforce with AI-related skills [79].”
Ishmuradova, I. I., Chistyakov, A. A., Brodskaya, T. A., Kosarenko, N. N., Savchenko, N. V., & Shindryaeva, N. N. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/15907 · Cited by 17
Sullivan, M., McAuley, M., Degiorgio, D., & McLaughlan, P. (2024) · Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.7 · Cited by 15
Li, J., King, R. B., Leung, S. O., & Wang, C. (2024) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102519 · Cited by 15
Self-citationOsman, Z., Mohamad, R. K., & Kasbun, N. (2024) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i7/22004 · Cited by 15
“This financial burden can hinder the usage of AI and limit its potential benefits for students and faculty Wang et al., 2023).”
BackgroundChow, T. S., & To, K. H. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15030310 · Cited by 21
“Similarly, the availability of resources, such as workshops, guides, and subscriptions to GAI tools, can enhance students’ access to and comfort with these technologies (Almaiah et al., 2022; Vuorikari et al., 2022; F. Wang et al., 2023).”
Li, S., & Lin, J. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70110 · Cited by 14
Generative Artificial Intelligence: Risks and Benefits for Educational InstitutionsPreprint
Göçen, A., & Rabia, A. S. A. N. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/mvcb5 · Cited by 13
Yurt, E. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08175-2 · Cited by 10
“Wang et al. (2023 ) demonstrated that when AI usage aligns with uni - versity students’ academic learning goals, it enhances their motivation based on attainment value.”
Wu, W. V., Ting, K.-Y., & Lin, P.-H. (2025) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2025.2554682 · Cited by 14
“This hypothesis is in line with recent evidence showing that university students’ intentions to master AI are fostered by supportive environments and their expectations of value to be derived from their efforts (Wang et al. 2023).”
Exploring students’ perceptions of generative AI-generated feedback in learning programming
Khor, E. T., Chan, L., Koh, E., & Seow, P. (2025) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2025.2564894 · Cited by 9
“For instance, racially biased output may unintentionally alienate or favour certain groups of students (Wang, 2023).”
InfluentialLi, H., Yang, F., & Liu, J. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04204-2 · Cited by 10
“Research has shown that when tasks are perceived as unappealing or overly complex, individuals tend to exhibit a stronger reliance on AI, viewing it as a means to ease the task burden and enhance efficiency [37, 38].”
Korkmaz, H., & Akbıyık, M. (2024) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.24.76.11.6 · Cited by 10
Abbas, A., Azar, B. B., Mahrishi, M., Núñez, J. L. M., & Mishra, D. (2025) · Equilibrium Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy · doi:10.24136/eq.3551 · Cited by 16
“Therefore, during the past several years, there has been a proliferation of academic contributions and ideas on educational AI governance (Wang et al. , 2023; Crompton & Burke, 2023).”
College Students' Use and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Survey Study
Strayhorn, T. L. (2025) · Journal of college student development · doi:10.1353/csd.2025.a962923 · Cited by 8
“Another study of 494 university students, Wang et al. (2023) found that college students’ perceptions and intentions to learn AI are powerfully shaped by supportive environments and expectancy beliefs.”
Palacios-Núñez, M. L., Mendoza-García, E. M., Zarate, J. W. N., & Deroncele-Acosta, Á. (2025) · Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa · doi:10.21556/edutec.2025.93.3995 · Cited by 14
Altakhaineh, A. R. M., AlKhatib, R. N., & Awad, T. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106252 · Cited by 7
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Ali, A. M., & Bakar, S. A. (2026) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-025-00171-2 · Cited by 10
Yin, S. X., & Goh, D. H. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2488141 · Cited by 9
“With the growing attention to AI education, recent research investigated the motivational factors that influence students ’ learning intention and experiences (Chai et al., 2021, 2022; Wang et al., 2023).”
How are faculty and college students embracing AI? — A multi-informant mixed method study
Xie, L., Jiang, Y., Chang, C., Zeng, X.-Y., Hong, J. S., & Mo, F. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100506 · Cited by 8
Almugren, I., Rai, J. S., Korayim, D., Mohanty, J., & Virmani, N. (2026) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2025-0957 · Cited by 8
Cheng, H.-H. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2600532 · Cited by 5
“Although AI-related courses are available, they are often elective rather than mandatory (Wang et al., 2023), requiring students to actively choose to enroll.”
InfluentialFactors influencing students’ intentions to continue learning in AI-assisted painting courses
Li, Y. E., Yang, Y., Chen, L., & Bao, S. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-40663-8 · Cited by 6
“Previous research has demonstrated that when students possess high learning self-efficacy and believe that technology has practical value in enhancing personal competence, they tend to exhibit stronger learning intention 54,55 .”
Li, Y., Harris, M. J., Dawod, A. Y., & Lawanna, T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3568834 · Cited by 6
“Efforts to provide AI-focused training workshops [77] and create supportive environments [78] are crucial for reducing barriers to AI adoption.”
Park, E. K. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2619983 · Cited by 7
“For instance, several scholars indicated that students with reduced technical capacity in AI applications were more likely to utilise the applications smoothly (F. Wang et al. 2023).”
Seo, H., da Silva, M. P., Jona, B., Iqbal, A., Burkett, K. M., Khan, H. U., & Carreño, A. U. (2025) · Online Media and Global Communication · doi:10.1515/omgc-2024-0060 · Cited by 5
“In this study, AI self-e ffi cacy was de fi ned as an individual ’ s con fi dence in their ability to learn and use AI and was measured by four items (Bandura 1997; Hong 2022; Wang et al. 2023).”
InfluentialUnderstanding Students' Intentions to Use AI for English Language Learning
Mouloudj, F., Aljaeed, S. A., & Asanza, D. M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9077-1.ch007 · Cited by 4
Atta, M. H. R., Zoromba, M., Magdi, H. M., El-Gazar, H., Elsayed, S. M., El-ayari, O., Balha, S. M. I., Rahman, A. A. A. O. A., & Eweida, R. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03353-w · Cited by 3
Arslan, M., Franklin, B., & Murdan, S. (2024) · Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.scp.2024.101639 · Cited by 5
Liu, F., Liu, Y., & Wang, F. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2394535 · Cited by 4
“…levels of expectancy-value beliefs are more likely to invest greater effort, engage more deeply, and allocate more time to learning activities, ultimately leading to higher levels of learning performance (Bong 2001; Guo et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2023a, 2023b; Wigfield, Eccles, and Möller 2020).”
Self-citationDu, M., & Ashraf, M. A. (2025) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.4168 · Cited by 4
Chowdhury, S., Rashid, M. M., Amin, M. B., Roy, T., Sony, M. M. A. A. M., & Rahaman, M. A. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101708 · Cited by 4
Korchak, A., Patarakin, E., & Costley, J. (2025) · RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education · doi:10.22363/2312-8631-2025-22-1-37-57 · Cited by 5
Yu, H., Fu, Y., & Zhong, S. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08937-y · Cited by 4
“The scale used in this study is based on Wang et al. ( 2023), which was adapted from Chai et al. (2020), and includes two dimensions: Social Support Norms (SN) and Facilitating Conditions (FC).”
AI or human? A study of university students’ awareness of library reference service agents
Wang, D., Guo, J., Zheng, K., & Deng, X. (2026) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-06-2025-0230 · Cited by 2
Expectancy-Value Beliefs as Predictors of Student Intentions in AI Learning and Application
Yin, S. X., & Goh, D. H. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0865-2_12 · Cited by 2
“Intention to learn was developed by Chai et al. [18] and has been validated among students and teachers in several studies [20,44].”
Xie, Z., Chen, R., & Ding, W. (2025) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/10732748251319487 · Cited by 2
Artificial intelligence adoption for pharmaceutical salesforce performance: a case study in Kuwait
Abdallah, W., Aziza, M., & Chamas, H. B. (2025) · Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development · doi:10.1108/jbsed-12-2024-0129 · Cited by 2
Hua, Y., & Sun, H. L. (2025) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101381 · Cited by 3
Bani-Hani, I., Hujran, O., & Anwar, M. (2026) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2026.2652347 · Cited by 3
The role of teacher feedback on students’ motivation: a situated expectancy-value perspective
Chen, J., Haw, J. Y., Yan, Z., & King, R. B. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1835077 · Cited by 2
Self-citationLukianova, L., Symela, K., & Religa, J. (2025) · The New Educational Review · doi:10.15804/tner.2025.81.3.12 · Cited by 2
Julie, F. Z. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media · doi:10.54254/2753-7048/2025.21811 · Cited by 1
The utility of perceived normative behavior to understand examinee effort on low-stakes assessments
Finney, S. J., Pastor, D. A., & Herr, R. K. (2025) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305058.2025.2530928 · Cited by 1
“Visual models depicting these theoretical relations show social expectations and norms impacting expectancies and values (e.g., Gladstone et al., 2022; Naylor et al., 2021; Skinner & Raine, 2022; Wang et al., 2023).”
Behavioural preference for Google and ChatGPT in an online search task
Healy, K., & Radell, M. L. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2560549 · Cited by 1
Kaçar, H. (2025) · Mehmet Akif Ersoy üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi. · doi:10.21764/maeuefd.1724993 · Cited by 1
Zang, X., Li, N., & Liang, Y. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2026.2613806 · Cited by 2
Shi, Y., Dong, Q., Chen, J., Wu, M., Shen, J., Chen, M. F., & Xu, H. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8420-8_24 · Cited by 2
Abousoliman, A. D., Elsehrawy, M. G., & Elgamal, H. G. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100567 · Cited by 1
Fortún, J. M. D. A. S., & Lluch, G. (2026) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.30827/relieve.v32i1.35886 · Cited by 1
AI and student motivation: A scoping review
Li, J., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., Lee, V. W. Y., & Li, R. (2026) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2026.2672515 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMa, Y., Zhao, X., Li, G., Liu, S., Liu, T., Zhao, Q., Xiao, M., & Wang, J. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2026.105659 · Cited by 1
Mbona, S. V., & Msosa, S. K. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1917699 · Cited by 1
Maigina, A., Fathurrohman, F., & Wuryandani, W. (2024) · International Journal of Elementary Education · doi:10.23887/ijee.v8i4.85994 · Cited by 7
“The views or perspectives of others will influence the actions a person will take (Mustafa et al., 2023; F. Wang et al., 2023).”
Motivations of Media Students to Adopt AI in Practical Courses
Albadri, H. (2024) · Studies in Media and Communication · doi:10.11114/smc.v12i3.6962
“However, existing research has demonstrated the importance of learning environments and motivational beliefs in fostering students’ intentions to learn about new technology (Wang et al., 2023).”
BackgroundThe Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in a Modern Mixed Economy College
Fuller, M., & Barnes, N. H. (2024) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1499-9.ch013
Pedagogical support for the use of artificial intelligence at university
Rakhimova, T. A., & Kaseka, I. P. (2024) · Professional education in the modern world · doi:10.20913/2618-7515-2024-3-12
AI Education: Fostering Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Ethical and User-Centred AI Development
Ondrusch, N., & Quandt, V. I. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93864-1_18
Cheng, H.-H. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98185-2_3
Ujager, F. S., Hamacha, S. R., Imam, N. M., & Farhan, R. B. M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1414-3.ch007
Rai, J. S., Kathuria, S., Kaur, H., Singh, A., & Itani, M. N. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5403389
ChatGPT as a Vocabulary Learning Tool for EFL Learners in Kazakhstan
Beknazar, L., & Lee, Y.-J. (2025) · Modern English Education · doi:10.18095/meeso.2025.26.0.336
Parsanejad, M., Sabouri, Y., & Abdolhamid, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5432715
zhang, Y., Jiang, S., Dong, R. K., Wang, F., & Li, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5679345
Self-citationzhang, Y., Jiang, S., Dong, R. K., Wang, F., & Li, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5679346
Self-citationThe use of artificial intelligence in Chinese language teaching
Kalibekuly, T., Jeldybayeva, R., Khungshan, A., Nurzhaubek, A., & Sabirova, M. (2025) · Global Chinese · doi:10.1515/glochi-2025-0006
Redefining Student Engagement in the Age of AI
Hınız, G. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7569-4.ch007
Li, J., Zhang, W., Nie, Q., & Yang, F. (2026) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.70053
Alshwiah, A. A., & Alaulamie, L. A. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/17982
Iturralde, D. D. O. (2026) · Etic net Revista científica electrónica de Educación y Comunicación en la Sociedad del Conocimiento · doi:10.30827/eticanet.v26i1.31168 · Cited by 2
“Wang et al. (2023) investigaron las intenciones de los estudiantes universitarios para aprender IA y el papel de los entornos de apoyo y las creencias de expectativa-valor.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Zhou, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- King, Ronnel B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
- Published
- 2023-08-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386023368
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 31.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, supportive learning environment, situated expectancy-value theory, university students, student subgroups, gender differences, field of study, year level
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
