Cited by 144Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchAgricultural and Biological ResearchPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Processing and extraction methods of medicinal cannabis: a narrative review

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: As the cannabis industry transitions from a black market to a legal market, product development, and methods of extraction have become a focal point. To date, more than thousands of chemical constituents have been identified from the cannabis plant, all of which possess different chemical properties that require different conditions for preservation during drying and extraction. However, scientific publications that explore these areas for the cannabis plant are currently lacking. Method: This is a narrative review paper which focuses on critiquing drying and extraction methods of Cannabis sativa L. plant. Relevant keywords such as medicinal cannabis, extraction, solvent, cannabinoids, and terpenes have been searched in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases. Result: To find relevant papers for this narrative review, 93 papers have been reviewed. Among them, 12 irrelevant papers were discarded. The excluded papers were either about hemp seed oil or hemp fiber and protein. Based on this review, solvent extraction is the most common method for cannabis plants. Although solventless and hydrodynamic extraction are known for their high yield and feasibility, more investigation is needed in these areas. Regarding the drying process, hang-drying is the most convenient method; however, it may be substituted by freeze-drying in the near future. Discussion: This review analyses various drying and extraction processes to guide the selection of suitable methods for various types of cannabis products and applications. This is done by outlining traditional and modern methods of drying techniques, exploring the importance of solvents for extraction, visiting solventless extraction procedures, and finally comparing conventional and alternative methods of extraction. Conclusion: In conclusion, based on the current knowledge, using organic solvents is the most convenient method for medicinal cannabis extraction. However, more research is needed for some of the drying and extraction methods. Also, developing a green and sustainable cannabis extraction method should be considered for future studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s42238-021-00087-9

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Air-drying (hang-drying) of the cannabis plant
Fig. 1 Air-drying (hang-drying) of the cannabis plantCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Vegetable oils composition by fatty acid profile, inspired by Yara-Varón et al. (2017)
Fig. 2 Vegetable oils composition by fatty acid profile, inspired by Yara-Varón et al. (2017)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 CO2 pressure–temperature phase diagram, the critical temperature is 304.13 K or 31.0 °C or 87.8°F, and the critical pressure is 7.3773 MPa or 72.8 atm or 1070 psi or 73.8 bar. (Adopted from Wikimedia commons URL: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Carbon_dioxide_pressure-temperature_phase_diagram.svg)
Fig. 3 CO2 pressure–temperature phase diagram, the critical temperature is 304.13 K or 31.0 °C or 87.8°F, and the critical pressure is 7.3773 MPa or 72.8 atm or 1070 psi or 73.8 bar. (Adopted from Wikimedia commons URL: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Carbon_dioxide_pressure-temperature_phase_diagram.svg)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 MAE process where the flask is housed in the microwave oven (Krishnan and Rajan 2017). Placing the flask containing the sample in the microwave, attached to a condenser outside of microwave to capture the solution of interest compounds after distillation
Fig. 4 MAE process where the flask is housed in the microwave oven (Krishnan and Rajan 2017). Placing the flask containing the sample in the microwave, attached to a condenser outside of microwave to capture the solution of interest compounds after distillationCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 PLE process using organic solvent as extracting solvent coupled with supercritical antisolvent (SAS) precipitation process (1) heat exchanger for cooling, (2) pump, (3) heat exchanger for heating, (4) extractor, (5) T-mixer, (6) precipitation vessels, and (7) filter (Santos and Meireles 2015)
Fig. 5 PLE process using organic solvent as extracting solvent coupled with supercritical antisolvent (SAS) precipitation process (1) heat exchanger for cooling, (2) pump, (3) heat exchanger for heating, (4) extractor, (5) T-mixer, (6) precipitation vessels, and (7) filter (Santos and Meireles 2015)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Diagram of a supercritical fluid extraction (Adopted from Wikiwand.com URL: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Supercritical_fluid_extraction#)
Fig. 6 Diagram of a supercritical fluid extraction (Adopted from Wikiwand.com URL: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Supercritical_fluid_extraction#)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Coffman C, Gentner W. Cannabis sativa L.: effect of drying time and temperature on cannabinoid profile of stored leaf tissue. Bull Narc. 1974;26(1):68–70.
  2. Duarte K, Justino C, Gomes A, Rocha-Santos T, Duarte A. Chapter 4—Green analytical methodologies for preparation of extracts and analysis of bioactive compounds. In: Teresa RS, Armando CD, editors. Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol. 65. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. p. 59–78.
  3. Green G, et al. The cannabis grow bible, Greg Green. 2001.
  4. Jin S, Chen J. Cannabis indoor growing conditions, management practices, and post-harvest treatment: a review. Am J Plant Sci. 2019;10(06):925. · DOI
  5. Romano LL, Hazekamp A. Cannabis oil: chemical evaluation of an upcoming cannabis-based medicine. Cannabinoids. 2013;1(1):1–11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–118 of 118

Metadata

Authors
Lazarjani, M. P., Young, O., Kebede, L., & Seyfoddin, A.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Seyfoddin, Ali
Venue
Journal of Cannabis Research
Published
2021-07-19
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
32-32
ISSN
2522-5782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184094075
Cited by
144
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cannabis Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
medical cannabis, Cannabis sativa, drying methods, solvent extraction, solvent-free extraction, cannabinoids, terpenes, freeze-drying, green extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review