Mobilizing strategic inflection points for sustainment of an effective intervention in an integrated learning health system: an interpretive description
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Innovative models of care have the potential to improve the sustainability of health systems by improving patient and provider experiences and population outcomes while simultaneously reducing costs. Yet, it is challenging to recognize the distinctive points during research and quality improvement processes that contribute to sustainment of effective interventions. The business concept of an inflection point-the position on the curve of a trajectory where the progress in implementation of an intervention is accelerated or decelerated-may be useful to understand implementation and improve sustainability and ultimately sustainment of effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively identify and describe strategic inflection points that accelerated the sustainability process and led to the sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted in Alberta, Canada and employed an interpretive description design. Purposively sampled documents (proposals, project management plans, reports to funders and sponsors, meeting minutes, and fidelity audit and feedback checklists) from the Alberta Family Integrated Care cluster randomized controlled trial and quality improvement project constituted data for this study. RESULTS: To accelerate sustainability in the research context, we identified (1) alignment with strategic priorities, (2) iterative, user-centered co-design, and (3) contextualization of implementation as strategic inflection points. To accelerate sustainability in the health system context, we identified (1) the learning health system, (2) enduring partnerships, (3) responsivity to societal and system change, (4) embedded governance, and (5) intentional integration into the health system as strategic inflection points. Capitalizing on these strategic inflection points led to sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care in the provincial health system. CONCLUSIONS: We identified key inflection points in the research and health system contexts that led to sustainment of Alberta Family Integrated Care. By anticipating, recognizing, and leveraging inflection points in the sustainability process, researchers may be able to accelerate implementation and achieve sustainment of multi-component interventions in complex systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02879799. Registration date: May 27, 2016. Protocol version: June 9, 2016; version 2. Protocol publication: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2181-3 .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change
Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-117 · Cited by 1,724 · see citing works
Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-17 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework
Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Rabin, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care
Shelton, R. C., Cooper, B. R., & Stirman, S. W. (2018) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice
Moullin, J. C., Dickson, K. S., Stadnick, N. A., Albers, B., Nilsen, P., Broder-Fingert, S., Mukasa, B., & Aarons, G. A. (2020) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Lennox, L., Maher, L., & Reed, J. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0707-4 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review
Hailemariam, M., Bustos, T., Montgomery, B., Barajas, R., Evans, L. B., & Drahota, A. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0910-6 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity
Pfadenhauer, L. M., Mozygemba, K., Gerhardus, A., Hofmann, B., Booth, A., Lysdahl, K. B., Tummers, M., Burns, J., & Rehfuess, E. A. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.004 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The sustainability of healthcare innovations: a concept analysis
Fleiszer, A. R., Semenic, S. E., Ritchie, J. A., Richer, M., & Denis, J. (2015) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12633 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Benzies, K. M., Zanoni, P., & McNeil, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Alberta Health Services (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Benzies, Karen M.
- Venue
- Implementation Science Communications
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 106-106
- ISSN
- 2662-2211 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11441001
- OpenAlex
- W4402974267
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Implementation Science Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Alberta Health Services
- Alberta Innovates
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- learning health systems, integrated care, co-design, embedded governance, health system integration, health system transformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review