Cited by 82Science Education and PedagogyInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationScience and Education Research

A Framework for Analyzing Interdisciplinary Tasks: Implications for Student Learning and Curricular Design

Open access
Gouvea, Julia Svoboda, Sawtelle, Vashti, Geller, Benjamin D., Turpen, Chandra·2013·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

The national conversation around undergraduate science instruction is calling for increased interdisciplinarity. As these calls increase, there is a need to consider the learning objectives of interdisciplinary science courses and how to design curricula to support those objectives. We present a framework that can help support interdisciplinary design research. We developed this framework in an introductory physics for life sciences majors (IPLS) course for which we designed a series of interdisciplinary tasks that bridge physics and biology. We illustrate how this framework can be used to describe the variation in the nature and degree of interdisciplinary interaction in tasks, to aid in redesigning tasks to better align with interdisciplinary learning objectives, and finally, to articulate design conjectures that posit how different characteristics of these tasks might support or impede interdisciplinary learning objectives. This framework will be useful for both curriculum designers and education researchers seeking to understand, in more concrete terms, what interdisciplinary learning means and how integrated science curricula can be designed to support interdisciplinary learning objectives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.12-08-0135

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learning tasks undergo a rigorous process of analysis using a rubric that measures the degree to which tasks integrate knowledge and reasoning strategies across disciplinary boundaries.

    “Tasks then undergo a rigorous process of analysis to ensure they foster development of the specified competencies; this is done by using a rubric that measures the degree to which the tasks integrate knowledge and reasoning strategies across disciplinary boundaries (Svoboda Gouvea et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National Research Council BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Biology Education for Future Research Biologists 2003 Washington, DC National Academies Press 20669482

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gouvea, J. S., Sawtelle, V., Geller, B. D., & Turpen, C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Gouvea, Julia Svoboda
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2013-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
187-205
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149099909
Cited by
82
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3
FWCI
37.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0750616, NSF-TUES DUE 11-22818, 1122818)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
Keywords
interdisciplinary learning, interdisciplinary tasks, curriculum development, learning objectives
MeSH terms
Animals, Biology, Curriculum, Fishes, Humans, Learning, Oligochaeta, Physics, Students, Models, Educational, Interdisciplinary Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review