Cited by 4,000Science Education and PedagogyEducational Research and MethodsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings

Brown, Ann L.·1992·Journal of the Learning Sciences

Abstract

(1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences: Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 141-178.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, A. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Ann L.
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
1992-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
141-178
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
OpenAlex
W2135503425
Cited by
4,000
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 155 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 181 · 2019: 202 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 173 · 2016: 202 · 2015: 190 · 2014: 218 · 2013: 185 · 2012: 178
FWCI
45.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
design experiments, complex interventions, classroom setting, intervention development, theoretical issues, methodological issues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review