Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language development

Meisel, Jürgen M.·1997·Second Language Research

Abstract

The acquisition of negation is perhaps the best-studied syntactic phenomenon in early interlanguage research,and many of these publications concluded that first (L1) and second language (L2) development had much more in common than had previously been assumed. In the present paper, the problem of whether the same underlying principles and mechanisms guide L1 and L2 acquisition will be re-examined from the perspective of more recent grammatical theory. The empirical basis consists of longitudinal case-studies of the acquisition of French and German as first and second languages. The L2 learners' first language is Spanish. In L1 data one finds a rapid, uniform and almost error-free course of development across languages exhibiting quite different morphosyntactic means of expressing negation. This is explained in terms of Parameter Theory, primarily referring to functional categories determining the placement of finite verbal elements. L2 acquisition, on the other hand, is characterized by considerable variability, not only crosslinguistically, but also across learners and even within individuals. This can be accounted for by assuming different strategies of language use. More importantly, different kinds of linguistic knowledge are drawn upon in L1 as opposed to L2. It is claimed that adult L2 learners, rather than using structure-dependent operations constrained by Universal Grammar (UG), rely primarily on linear sequencing strategies which apply to surface strings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/026765897666180760

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Andersen, R.W., 1983, Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition
  2. Andersen, R.W., 1984, Second languages: a cross-linguistic perspective
  3. Belletti, A., 1990, Generalized verb movement: aspects of verb syntax
  4. Bickerton, D., 1977, Pidgin and creole linguistics, 49
  5. Bloom, L.M., 1970, Language development: form and function in emerging grammars
  6. 10.3406/lgge.1969.2023 · doi:10.3406/lgge.1969.2023
  7. 10.1515/9783110810226 · doi:10.1515/9783110810226
  8. Cancino, H., 1978, Second language acquisition, 207
  9. Cazden, C.B., 1975, Second language acquisition sequences in children, adolescents and adults: final report
  10. Chomsky, N., 1981, Lectures on government and binding: the Pisa lectures
  11. Chomsky, N., 1986, Barriers
  12. Chomsky, N., 1989, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 43
  13. 10.1017/S0305000900007911 · doi:10.1017/s0305000900007911
  14. Clahsen, H., 1984, Second languages:a cross-linguistic perspective, 219
  15. 10.1515/ZFSW.1988.7.1.3 · doi:10.1515/zfsw.1988.7.1.3
  16. Clahsen, H., 1988, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, 47, 10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_4 · DOI
  17. Clahsen, H., 1983, Deutsch als Zweitsprache: der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter
  18. 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79 · doi:10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79
  19. Déprez, V., 1993, Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 25
  20. 10.1207/s15327817la0303_1 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/026765839601200104 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ezeizabarrena, M.J., 1991, Adquisición del lenguaje en niños bilingües y monolingües, 1983
  23. Fitzgerald, W.A. 1978: Nativization and second language acquisition: a stury of negation. MA thesis, Southern Illinois University.
  24. Grewendorf, G., 1990, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 30, 57
  25. 10.1017/S0008413100021976 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/026765839401000201 · doi:10.1177/026765839401000201
  27. Hamann, C., 1994, Negation, infinitives, and heads
  28. 10.1075/lald.8.08hoe · doi:10.1075/lald.8.08hoe
  29. 10.1515/9783110902600.177 · doi:10.1515/9783110902600.177
  30. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00129.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hyltenstam, K., 1978, Working Papers:Phonetics Laboratory/Department of Linguistics
  32. Klima, E., 1966, Psycholinguistic Papers, 183
  33. McNeill, D., 1968, Proceedings of the conference on language and language behavior
  34. Meisel, J.M., 1977, The notions of simplication, interlanguages and pidgins and their relation to second language pedagogy, 88
  35. Meisel, J.M., 1983, Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition, 120
  36. 10.1075/lald.3.12mei · doi:10.1075/lald.3.12mei
  37. 10.31819/9783964561466-007 · doi:10.31819/9783964561466-007
  38. Meisel, J.M., 1995, The handbook of child language, 10
  39. Meisel, J.M., 1997, Actes du Colloque International sur l'Acquisition de la Syntaxe en Langue Maternelle et en Langue Etrangère (Annales Litteraires de l'Université de Franche-Comté, 631), 189
  40. 10.1017/S0272263100004137 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Mills, A., 1985, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 141
  42. 10.2307/3585537 · DOI
  43. Noyau, C., European–North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research
  44. 10.4324/9780203412015 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1017/S0305000900007698 · doi:10.1017/s0305000900007698
  46. Perdue, C., 1993, Adult second language acquisition:crosslinguistic perspectives. Volume 1, Field methods
  47. Perdue, C., 1993, Adult second language acquisition: crosslinguistic perspectives. Volume 2,The results
  48. Pierce, A.E. 1989: On the emergence of syntax: a crosslinguistic study. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
  49. 10.1007/978-94-011-2574-1 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Pollock, J.-Y., 1989, Linguisitic Inquiry, 20, 365
  51. Radford, A., 1986, Bangor Research Papers in Linguistics, 1, 1
  52. Radford, A., 1990, Syntactic theory and the acquisition of syntax
  53. 10.1515/iral.1968.6.1-4.175 · DOI
  54. Schumann, J., 1978, The pidginization process:a model for second language acquisition
  55. Schumann, J., 1979, The acquisition and use of Spanish and English as first and second languages, 3
  56. 10.1075/lald.3.13sch · doi:10.1075/lald.3.13sch
  57. 10.1075/lald.8.14sch · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00303.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00303.x
  59. Stauble, A.-M., 1984, Second languages: a cross-linguistic perspective, 323
  60. Tomaselli, A., 1990, Second Language Research, 6, 1
  61. 10.1017/S0305000900000490 · DOI
  62. Wode, H., 1981, Learning a second language, Volume 1, An integrated view of language acquisition
  63. Zanuttini, R. 1991: Syntactic properties of sentential negation: a comparative study of Romance languages. PhD. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Meisel, J. M.
Venue
Second Language Research
Published
1997-07
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
227-263
ISSN
  • 0165-9960 (ISSN-L)
  • 0267-6583
  • 1477-0326
OpenAlex
W2005475716
Cited by
280
References
1
FWCI
33.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/026765897666180760
The paper
Meisel, J. M. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666180760

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.