The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?)
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we discuss the implications of the fact that adult second language learners (outside the classroom) universally develop a well-structured, efficient and simple form of language–the Basic Variety (BV). Three questions are asked as to (1) the structural properties of the BV, (2) the status of these properties and (3) why some structural properties of ‘fully fledged’ languages are more complex. First, we characterize the BV in four respects: its lexical repertoire, the principles according to which utterances are structured, and temporality and spatiality expressed. The organizational principles proposed are small in number, and interact. We analyse this interaction, describing how the BV is put to use in various complex verbal tasks, in order to establish both what its communicative potentialities are, and also those discourse contexts where the constraints come into conflict and where the variety breaks down. This latter phenomenon provides a partial answer to the third question,concerning the relative complexity of ‘fully fledged’ languages–they have devices to deal with such cases. As for the second question, it is argued firstly that the empirically established continuity of the adult acquisition process precludes any assignment of the BV to a mode of linguistic expression (e.g., ‘protolanguage’) distinct from that of ‘fully fledged’ languages and, moreover, that the organizational constraints of the BV belong to the core attributes of the human language capacity, whereas a number of complexifications not attested in the BV are less central properties of this capacity. Finally, it is shown that the notion of feature strength, as used in recent versions of Generative Grammar, allows a straightforward characterization of the BV as a special case of an I-language, in the sense of this theory. Under this perspective, the acquisition of an Ilanguage beyond the BV can essentially be described as a change in feature strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use.
Hornstein, N., & Chomsky, N. (1988) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185417 · Cited by 4,650
The Study of Second Language Acquisition
Brown, C., & Ellis, R. (1996) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329065 · Cited by 4,199
A theory of focus interpretation
Rooth, M. (1992) · Natural Language Semantics · doi:10.1007/bf02342617 · Cited by 3,194
Selinker, L. (1972) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 · Cited by 2,962
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS
Corder, S. P. (1967) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161 · Cited by 2,466
L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/026765839601200103 · Cited by 1,743
Bickerton, D. (1990) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001 · Cited by 1,587
Language Universals and Linguistic Typology
Comrie, B. (1981) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 1,388
Pidginization and Creolization of Languages.
le Page, R. B., & Hymes, D. (1972) · Man · doi:10.2307/2800977 · Cited by 1,275
The study of second language acquisition
Edmondson, W. (1995) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(95)90034-6 · Cited by 1,270
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution
Jackendoff, R. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 · Cited by 3,244
Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 · Cited by 1,079
Task‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings
Ellis, R. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · Cited by 1,031
Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure
Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008559 · Cited by 786
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
- Venue
- Second Language Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 301-347
- ISSN
- 0165-9960 (ISSN-L)
- 0267-6583
- 1477-0326
- OpenAlex
- W2083846965
- Cited by
- 830
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 62.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/026765897666879396
- The paper
- Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.