The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Languages differ greatly both in their syntactic and morphological systems and in the social environments in which they exist. We challenge the view that language grammars are unrelated to social environments in which they are learned and used. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a statistical analysis of >2,000 languages using a combination of demographic sources and the World Atlas of Language Structures--a database of structural language properties. We found strong relationships between linguistic factors related to morphological complexity, and demographic/socio-historical factors such as the number of language users, geographic spread, and degree of language contact. The analyses suggest that languages spoken by large groups have simpler inflectional morphology than languages spoken by smaller groups as measured on a variety of factors such as case systems and complexity of conjugations. Additionally, languages spoken by large groups are much more likely to use lexical strategies in place of inflectional morphology to encode evidentiality, negation, aspect, and possession. Our findings indicate that just as biological organisms are shaped by ecological niches, language structures appear to adapt to the environment (niche) in which they are being learned and used. As adults learn a language, features that are difficult for them to acquire, are less likely to be passed on to subsequent learners. Languages used for communication in large groups that include adult learners appear to have been subjected to such selection. Conversely, the morphological complexity common to languages used in small groups increases redundancy which may facilitate language learning by infants. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We hypothesize that language structures are subjected to different evolutionary pressures in different social environments. Just as biological organisms are shaped by ecological niches, language structures appear to adapt to the environment (niche) in which they are being learned and used. The proposed Linguistic Niche Hypothesis has implications for answering the broad question of why languages differ in the way they do and makes empirical predictions regarding language acquisition capacities of children versus adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4321 · Cited by 3,820
Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech
Bloomfield, L., & Sapir, E. (1922) · The Classical Weekly · doi:10.2307/4388302 · Cited by 3,188
The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999094x · Cited by 2,623
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online
Dryer, M. S., Haspelmath, M., & Forkel, R. (2022) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7135714 · Cited by 2,542
Language Contact and Grammatical Change
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614132 · Cited by 1,743
Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time
Nichols, J. (1992) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 · Cited by 1,654
Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form
Aronoff, M., & Bybee, J. L. (1987) · Language · doi:10.2307/415386 · Cited by 1,259
Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin
Gray, R. D., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02029 · Cited by 1,100
The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity
Dahl, Ö. (2004) · Studies in Language Companion Series · doi:10.1075/slcs.71 · Cited by 875
Bickerton, D. (1981) · Cited by 873
Cited by
Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure
Kirby, S., Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016 · Cited by 557
How Efficiency Shapes Human Language
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. P., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003 · Cited by 485
Dediu, D., & Levinson, S. C. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397 · Cited by 437
Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency
Hawkins, J. A. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664993.001.0001 · Cited by 405
Languages with More Second Language Learners Tend to Lose Nominal Case
Bentz, C., & Winter, B. (2013) · Language Dynamics and Change · doi:10.1163/22105832-13030105 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Lupyan, G., & Dale, R.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-01-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e8559
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029447880
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 553.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559
- The paper
- Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2010). Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.