The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commodifying what nature?
Abstract
In this essay contemporary Marxist writings on the commodification of nature in capitalist societies are reviewed systematically. Recent research on commodities in human geography, cultural studies and related fields have been largely post or non-Marxist in tenor and have paid relatively little attention to the ‘natural’ dimensions of commodities. By contrast, recent Marxist writings about capitalism-nature relations have tried to highlight both the specificity of capitalist commodification and its effects on ecologies and bodies. This fact notwithstanding, it is argued that the explanatory and normative dimensions of this Marxist work are, respectively, at risk of being misunderstood and remain largely implicit. On the explanatory side, confusion arises because the words ‘commodification’ and ‘nature’ are used by different Marxists to refer to different things that deserve to be disentangled. On the normative side, the Marxian criticisms of nature's commodification are rarely explicit and often assumed to be self-evident. The essay offers a typology of commodification processes relating to specific natures with specific effects to which a variety of criticisms can be applied. Though essentially exegetical rather than reconstructive, the essay tries to pave the way for a more precise sense of how the commodification of nature in capitalist societies works and why it might be deemed to be problematic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective
(1986) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819582 · Cited by 6,267
Polanyi, K. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch4 · Cited by 6,208
The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process
Kopytoff, I. (1986) · The Social Life of Things · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819582.004 · Cited by 4,867
Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference
Mathewson, K., & Harvey, D. (1997) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/215233 · Cited by 4,624
Bhaskar, R. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203090732 · Cited by 4,012
Shilling, C. (2003) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446215470 · Cited by 2,391
Sayer, A. (2000) · doi:10.4135/9781446218730 · Cited by 2,259
Sayer, A. (2000) · Cited by 1,753
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-3722 · Cited by 1,682
Cited by
Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · Cited by 1,928
Sovacool, B. K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 · Cited by 614
Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data
Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Mahmoudi, D. (2016) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775816633195 · Cited by 512
Lively commodities and encounter value
Barua, M. (2016) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775815626420 · Cited by 242
Introduction: Accumulation by restoration and political ecologies of repair
Huff, A., & Brock, A. (2023) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486231168393 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Castree, N.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-297
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2003928520
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 21.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commodifying what nature? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/0309132503ph428oa
- The paper
- Castree, N. (2003). Commodifying what nature? Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph428oa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.