The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Introduction: Accumulation by restoration and political ecologies of repair
Abstract
Accumulation by Restoration (AbR) represents a shift from a conservationist ‘mode of production’ emphasizing sustainability and preservation to a ‘growth economy of repair’ in which nature becomes valued not just for its use but also for its potential for repair or restoration. The ‘repair mode’ mobilizes the assumption, imagery and mythology of degradation juxtaposed with the promise of economic and ecological redemption. Through rationalization, restoration, re-creation and/or re-cultivation, it aims to generate new, better-disciplined, more legible, ‘substitutable’ natures to multiple accumulative ends. Bridging political ecology, critical agrarian studies and science and technology studies, contributions to this themed issue explore transformations associated with AbR at across scales and involving variegated alliances, discourses, technologies and institutional dynamics giving rise to ecologies of repair. We demonstrate how the dynamics and contradictions of the repair mode are mediated and enacted through the performative, spectacular and metrological rendering of ‘mitigation’, ‘equivalence’, ‘neutrality’ and ‘repair’ as instruments and object, simultaneous means and ends. These dynamics have given rise to new materialities and technologies of governance and new intensities and spatialities of resource control and accumulation, as what were consequences of growth have become strategic goals and the foundation of a new growth economy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The concept of repair extolled by Big Agricultural AI (or Big Ag AI) is used with ill will: farmers are painted as 'backwards' and 'environmental predators', but mined for local knowledge to feed AI, which in turn reifies 'human-nature separation embodied in colonial fantasies of domination and control' (citing Huff and Brock 2023, 2116).”
From A Reply on Responsibility and Repair in AI : Lessons From Outer Space, Agriculture and Gay Hookup Apps (2026) · cites this paper as Huff and Brock 2023
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 101
- 10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/j.ctt183pb6f · DOI
- Anker P, 2021, Imperial Ecology. Imperial Ecology
- Benoist L, 2020, Green is the New Brown: Ecology in the Metapolitics of the French far Right Today
- 10.3389/fcosc.2021.666910 · DOI
- 10.1108/S0161-723020180000033004 · DOI
- Bookchin M, 1987, Green Perspectives: Newsletter of the Green Program Project, 1987, 4
- 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419 · DOI
- Brock A, 2019, Conserving Nature Power: An Exploration of Biodiversity Offsetting in Europe and Beyond
- 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.018 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00760.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00763.x · DOI
- 10.1080/10455752.2012.674149 · DOI
- Caffentzis G, 2014, Community Development Journal, 49
- 10.1007/978-94-009-9109-5_8 · DOI
- 10.1177/0308518X18796510 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00768.x · DOI
- 10.1080/08941920.2017.1284291 · DOI
- 10.1080/08941920.2017.1320176 · DOI
- 10.1191/0309132503ph428oa · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.013 · DOI
- 10.2458/jpe.4683 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00764.x · DOI
- 10.1177/194277861300600101 · DOI
- 10.2307/3985059 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/030913259201600401 · DOI
- 10.1177/147447409600300406 · DOI
- 10.1016/0962-6298(96)00032-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/0263276415598629 · DOI
- De Angelis M, 2014, The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization, 280
- Debord G, 1967, Society of the Spectacle
- Devall B, 1985, Deep Ecology
- 10.1017/S0376892910000044 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-99646-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/2514848619874691 · DOI
- 10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · DOI · Paper page
- Federici S, 2019, Radical Philosophy, 2, 55
- Fischer-Kowalski M, 2011, Decoupling: Natural Resource use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth
- 10.1353/arw.0.0095 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctv28vb1wq · DOI
- Guterres A, 2020, Secretary-General’s Address at Columbia University:“The State of the Planet”
- 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1024 · DOI
- 10.1215/01636545-2010-017 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203946848 · DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.4058592 · DOI
- 10.1177/25148486211015056 · DOI
- Huff A, 2017, Antipode Interventions
- 10.5040/9781350040946.ch-003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102195 · DOI
- Hui Y, 2020, E-Flux Journal, 114
- 10.11647/obp.0265.01 · DOI
- 10.1177/0308275X10372468 · DOI
- Igoe J, 2008, Nature Unbound. Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas
- IPCC, 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group14 I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- Jessop B, 2015, New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research
- 10.2307/j.ctt2005tk7.8 · DOI
- 10.1080/03066150.2011.607695 · DOI
- 10.1177/017084069101200205 · DOI
- 10.1080/1943815X.2012.742914 · DOI
- Kröger M, 2022, Extractivisms, Existences and Extinctions: Monoculture Plantations and Amazon Deforestation
- 10.3197/096734000129342361 · DOI
- Luxemburg R, 2016, The Accumulation of Capital: A Contribution to an Economic Explanation of Imperialism
- 10.1057/dev.2011.105 · DOI
- McCarthy J, 2004, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 35, 275
- Marx K, 1887, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. 1
- Meadows DH, 1972, The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Proyect on the Predicament of Mankind
- 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.027 · DOI
- 10.1080/09644010008414511 · DOI
- 10.1111/jlca.12170 · DOI
- 10.1080/00201747308601682 · DOI
- 10.1080/21693293.2014.872456 · DOI
- Neumann RP, 1998, Imposing Wilderness: Struggles over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa
- 10.1177/0308518X18755748 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203842249-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.12123 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00476.x · DOI
- 10.1068/d3304 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/461472a · DOI · Paper page
- Smith JK, 2021, The (Re) Emergence of Eco-Fascism: White-Nationalism, Sacrifice, and Proto-Fascism in the Circulation of Digital Rhetoric in the Ecological Far-Right
- Smith N, 2007, Socialist Register, 2007, 16
- 10.1177/25148486211045360 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
- Sullivan S, 2009, Radical Anthropology, 3, 18
- 10.3898/NEWF.69.06.2010 · DOI
- 10.1177/194277861300600106 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00989.x · DOI
- Sullivan S, 2014, And Values. Manchester:
- 10.2458/v24i1.20802 · DOI
- Sullivan S, 2019, Valuing Development, Environment and Conservation: Creating Values that Matter, 101
- 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2963 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0263276418757314 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781351104043-16 · DOI
- 10.1525/can.2000.15.3.327 · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400830596 · DOI · Paper page
- 2011, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication
- 10.1177/25148486221107221 · DOI
- Voskoboynik DM, 2021, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space
- 10.1017/9781108560962.003 · DOI
Cited by
Stevens, N., & Gieseking, J. J. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70046 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Huff, A., & Brock, A.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Development Studies, The University of Sussex, UK
- The University of Sussex, UK
- Venue
- Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-04-25
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2113-2133
- ISSN
- 2514-8486
- 2514-8494
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/I021620/1, ES/W009331/1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction: Accumulation by restoration and political ecologies of repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/25148486231168393
- The paper
- Huff, A., & Brock, A. (2023). Introduction: Accumulation by restoration and political ecologies of repair. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231168393