The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural economy: a critical review
Abstract
This article reviews work on `cultural economy', particularly from within geography, and from other disciplines, where there are links to overtly geographical debates. We seek to clarify different interpretations of the term and to steer a course through this multivalency to suggest productive new research agendas. We review and critique work on cultural economy that represents a relatively straightforward economic geography, based on empirical observation while theoretically informed and driven by debates about Fordism and post-Fordism, agglomeration and cluster theory. Some of these ideas about cultural economy have proven attractive to policy-makers and we map a normative script of cultural economy, with its prescriptive recommendations for economic development, which we then critique. Turning from this normative cultural economy, we move to a more theoretical discussion which reinterprets the cultural economy in light of debates on the culturization of `the economic' in research praxis. We conclude that better acknowledgement is needed of the contradictory uses of `cultural economy', but point nevertheless value of this multivalency as long as we reflect on the multiple contradictions and interpretations. With many current absences in work on cultural economy, we suggest various agendas waiting to be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*
Bourdieu, P. (2018) · Food and Culture · doi:10.4324/9781315680347-10 · Cited by 20,289
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
Warner, M., Bourdieu, P., & Nice, R. (1985) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2905454 · Cited by 14,091
The rise of the creative class: and how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2276 · Cited by 6,488
The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade
Holmes, T. J., Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (2000) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061487 · Cited by 5,032
Clusters and the New Economics of Competition
Milošević, D. (2014) · Harvard business review · Cited by 4,856
The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001 · Cited by 4,788 · cited 2×
“Observations of the agglomerative tendencies in activities within the cultural economy concur with work in what has been labelled ‘new geographical economics’ (Krugman, 1998; Fujita et al., 1999; Porter, 2002).”
BackgroundThe Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
Benjamin, W. (2007) · Stardom and Celebrity: A Reader · doi:10.4135/9781446269534.n3 · Cited by 3,818
Gregory, D., Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076072 · Cited by 3,365
Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/3.1.5 · Cited by 2,234
Creative industries: contracts between art and commerce
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1661 · Cited by 1,957
Cited by
Richards, G. (2011) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2011.07.008 · Cited by 834
No funny business: Precarious work and emotional labour in stand-up comedy
Butler, N., & Stoyanova Russell, D. (2018) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718758880 · Cited by 117
Signals and Signposts of the Future: Literary Festival Consumption in 2050
Robertson, M., & Yeoman, I. (2014) · Tourism Recreation Research · doi:10.1080/02508281.2014.11087004 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibson, C., & Kong, L.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 541-561
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2101618272
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 46.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cultural economy: a critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/0309132505ph567oa
- The paper
- Gibson, C., & Kong, L. (2005). Cultural economy: a critical review. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph567oa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.