Cited by 22Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Depression and fatigue in relapsing-remitting MS: the role of symptomatic variability

Randolph, John J, Arnett, Peter A·2005·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Depression and fatigue are common psychosocial sequelae of MS. An infrequently examined issue in the MS literature is the effect of MS-related symptom variability on incidence of depression and fatigue. The current study was designed to examine the relationship of variability in physical, cognitive, and social/environmental functioning with depression and fatigue in MS. Forty-eight relapsing-remitting MS patients from a larger sample completed self-report measures of depression and fatigue. They were also administered a structured interview that assessed current, best, and worst levels of functioning since being diagnosed with MS. Higher levels of symptom variability since disease onset were associated with depression and fatigue, even after accounting for MS-related physical disability. Regression analyses indicated that variability in social and environmental functioning was particularly associated with depression, and variability in physical abilities was associated with fatigue. These findings suggest that a more variable course of MS symptoms is associated with increased depression and fatigue. Focused assessment of variability in symptoms may be useful in detecting and subsequently treating depression and fatigue in MS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/1352458505ms1133oa

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randolph, J. J., & Arnett, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2005-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
186-190
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2044526129
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, depression, fatigue, symptom variability, physical function, cognitive function, social functioning, physical disability, psychosocial sequelae
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Regression Analysis, Incidence, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review