Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RETRACTED – Mental health in UK Biobank: development, implementation and results from an online questionnaire completed by 157 366 participants

Open access
Davis, Katrina A. S., Coleman, Jonathan R. I., Adams, Mark, Allen, Naomi, Breen, Gerome, Cullen, Breda, Dickens, Chris, Fox, Elaine, Graham, Nick, Holliday, Jo, Howard, Louise M., John, Ann, Lee, William, McCabe, Rose, McIntosh, Andrew, Pearsall, Robert, Smith, Daniel J., Sudlow, Cathie, Ward, Joey, Zammit, Stan, Hotopf, Matthew·2018·BJPsych Open

Abstract

Background: UK Biobank is a well-characterised cohort of over 500 000 participants that offers unique opportunities to investigate multiple diseases and risk factors. Aims: An online mental health questionnaire completed by UK Biobank participants was expected to expand the potential for research into mental disorders. Method: An expert working group designed the questionnaire, using established measures where possible, and consulting with a patient group regarding acceptability. Case definitions were defined using operational criteria for lifetime depression, mania, anxiety disorder, psychotic-like experiences and self-harm, as well as current post-traumatic stress and alcohol use disorders. Results: 157 366 completed online questionnaires were available by August 2017. Comparison of self-reported diagnosed mental disorder with a contemporary study shows a similar prevalence, despite respondents being of higher average socioeconomic status than the general population across a range of indicators. Thirty-five per cent (55 750) of participants had at least one defined syndrome, of which lifetime depression was the most common at 24% (37 434). There was extensive comorbidity among the syndromes. Mental disorders were associated with high neuroticism score, adverse life events and long-term illness; addiction and bipolar affective disorder in particular were associated with measures of deprivation. Conclusions: The questionnaire represents a very large mental health survey in itself, and the results presented here show high face validity, although caution is needed owing to selection bias. Built into UK Biobank, these data intersect with other health data to offer unparalleled potential for crosscutting biomedical research involving mental health. Declaration of interest: G.B. received grants from the National Institute for Health Research during the study; and support from Illumina Ltd. and the European Commission outside the submitted work. B.C. received grants from the Scottish Executive Chief Scientist Office and from The Dr Mortimer and Theresa Sackler Foundation during the study. C.S. received grants from the Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust during the study, and is the Chief Scientist for UK Biobank. M.H. received grants from the Innovative Medicines Initiative via the RADAR-CNS programme and personal fees as an expert witness outside the submitted work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2018.12This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61238-0 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075362 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00195-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/da.20634 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.47 · DOI
  6. Craig, 2015, HSE 2014
  7. 10.1177/2049463715569806 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093122 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30244-4 · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30244-4
  10. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004295 · DOI
  11. 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167862 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000493 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-376 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/aje/kww009 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.024 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/jech.2006.058966 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/gps.4659 · DOI
  18. Bridges, 2015, HSE 2014
  19. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.09.008 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/s12888-016-0963-x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Davis, K. A. S., Coleman, J. R. I., Adams, M., Allen, N., Breen, G., Cullen, B., Dickens, C., Fox, E., Graham, N., Holliday, J., Howard, L. M., John, A., Lee, W., McCabe, R., McIntosh, A., Pearsall, R., Smith, D. J., Sudlow, C., Ward, J., Zammit, S., & Hotopf, M.
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
83-90
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785323391
Cited by
236
References
13
FWCI
37.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RETRACTED – Mental health in UK Biobank: development, implementation and results from an online questionnaire completed by 157 366 participants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjo.2018.12
The paper
Davis, K. A. S., Coleman, J. R. I., Adams, M., Allen, N., Breen, G., Cullen, B., Dickens, C., Fox, E., Graham, N., Holliday, J., Howard, L. M., John, A., Lee, W., McCabe, R., McIntosh, A., Pearsall, R., Smith, D. J., Sudlow, C., Ward, J., . . . Hotopf, M. (2018). RETRACTED – Mental health in UK Biobank: development, implementation and results from an online questionnaire completed by 157 366 participants. BJPsych Open. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.