Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

Open access
Newton, John N, Briggs, Adam D M, Murray, Christopher J L, Dicker, Daniel, Foreman, Kyle J, Wang, Haidong, Naghavi, Mohsen, Forouzanfar, Mohammad H, Ohno, Summer Lockett, Barber, Ryan M, Vos, Theo, Stanaway, Jeffrey D, Schmidt, Jürgen C, Hughes, Andrew J, Fay, Derek F J, Ecob, Russell, Gresser, Charis, McKee, Martin, Rutter, Harry, Abubakar, Ibrahim, Ali, Raghib, Anderson, H Ross, Banerjee, Amitava, Bennett, Derrick A, Bernabé, Eduardo, Bhui, Kamaldeep S, Biryukov, Stanley M, Bourne, Rupert R, Brayne, Carol E G, Bruce, Nigel G, Brugha, Traolach S, Burch, Michael, Capewell, Simon, Casey, Daniel, Chowdhury, Rajiv, Coates, Matthew M, Cooper, Cyrus, Critchley, Julia A, Dargan, Paul I, Dherani, Mukesh K, Elliott, Paul, Ezzati, Majid, Fenton, Kevin A, Fraser, Maya S, Fürst, Thomas, Greaves, Felix, Green, Mark A, Gunnell, David J, Hannigan, Bernadette M, Hay, Roderick J, Hay, Simon I, Hemingway, Harry, Larson, Heidi J, Looker, Katharine J, Lunevicius, Raimundas, Lyons, Ronan A, Marcenes, Wagner, Mason-Jones, Amanda J, Matthews, Fiona E, Moller, Henrik, Murdoch, Michele E, Newton, Charles R, Pearce, Neil, Piel, Frédéric B, Pope, Daniel, Rahimi, Kazem, Rodriguez, Alina, Scarborough, Peter, Schumacher, Austin E, Shiue, Ivy, Smeeth, Liam, Tedstone, Alison, Valabhji, Jonathan, Williams, Hywel C, Wolfe, Charles D A, Woolf, Anthony D, Davis, Adrian C J·2015·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013), knowledge about health and its determinants has been integrated into a comparable framework to inform health policy. Outputs of this analysis are relevant to current policy questions in England and elsewhere, particularly on health inequalities. We use GBD 2013 data on mortality and causes of death, and disease and injury incidence and prevalence to analyse the burden of disease and injury in England as a whole, in English regions, and within each English region by deprivation quintile. We also assess disease and injury burden in England attributable to potentially preventable risk factors. England and the English regions are compared with the remaining constituent countries of the UK and with comparable countries in the European Union (EU) and beyond. METHODS: We extracted data from the GBD 2013 to compare mortality, causes of death, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with a disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in England, the UK, and 18 other countries (the first 15 EU members [apart from the UK] and Australia, Canada, Norway, and the USA [EU15+]). We extended elements of the analysis to English regions, and subregional areas defined by deprivation quintile (deprivation areas). We used data split by the nine English regions (corresponding to the European boundaries of the Nomenclature for Territorial Statistics level 1 [NUTS 1] regions), and by quintile groups within each English region according to deprivation, thereby making 45 regional deprivation areas. Deprivation quintiles were defined by area of residence ranked at national level by Index of Multiple Deprivation score, 2010. Burden due to various risk factors is described for England using new GBD methodology to estimate independent and overlapping attributable risk for five tiers of behavioural, metabolic, and environmental risk factors. We present results for 306 causes and 2337 sequelae, and 79 risks or risk clusters. FINDINGS: Between 1990 and 2013, life expectancy from birth in England increased by 5·4 years (95% uncertainty interval 5·0-5·8) from 75·9 years (75·9-76·0) to 81·3 years (80·9-81·7); gains were greater for men than for women. Rates of age-standardised YLLs reduced by 41·1% (38·3-43·6), whereas DALYs were reduced by 23·8% (20·9-27·1), and YLDs by 1·4% (0·1-2·8). For these measures, England ranked better than the UK and the EU15+ means. Between 1990 and 2013, the range in life expectancy among 45 regional deprivation areas remained 8·2 years for men and decreased from 7·2 years in 1990 to 6·9 years in 2013 for women. In 2013, the leading cause of YLLs was ischaemic heart disease, and the leading cause of DALYs was low back and neck pain. Known risk factors accounted for 39·6% (37·7-41·7) of DALYs; leading behavioural risk factors were suboptimal diet (10·8% [9·1-12·7]) and tobacco (10·7% [9·4-12·0]). INTERPRETATION: Health in England is improving although substantial opportunities exist for further reductions in the burden of preventable disease. The gap in mortality rates between men and women has reduced, but marked health inequalities between the least deprived and most deprived areas remain. Declines in mortality have not been matched by similar declines in morbidity, resulting in people living longer with diseases. Health policies must therefore address the causes of ill health as well as those of premature mortality. Systematic action locally and nationally is needed to reduce risk exposures, support healthy behaviours, alleviate the severity of chronic disabling disorders, and mitigate the effects of socioeconomic deprivation. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Public Health England.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00195-6

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Newton, J. N., Briggs, A. D. M., Murray, C. J. L., Dicker, D., Foreman, K. J., Wang, H., Naghavi, M., Forouzanfar, M. H., Ohno, S. L., Barber, R. M., Vos, T., Stanaway, J. D., Schmidt, J. C., Hughes, A. J., Fay, D. F. J., Ecob, R., Gresser, C., McKee, M., Rutter, H., Abubakar, I., Ali, R., Anderson, H. R., Banerjee, A., Bennett, D. A., Bernabé, E., Bhui, K. S., Biryukov, S. M., Bourne, R. R., Brayne, C. E. G., Bruce, N. G., Brugha, T. S., Burch, M., Capewell, S., Casey, D., Chowdhury, R., Coates, M. M., Cooper, C., Critchley, J. A., Dargan, P. I., Dherani, M. K., Elliott, P., Ezzati, M., Fenton, K. A., Fraser, M. S., Fürst, T., Greaves, F., Green, M. A., Gunnell, D. J., Hannigan, B. M., Hay, R. J., Hay, S. I., Hemingway, H., Larson, H. J., Looker, K. J., Lunevicius, R., Lyons, R. A., Marcenes, W., Mason-Jones, A. J., Matthews, F. E., Moller, H., Murdoch, M. E., Newton, C. R., Pearce, N., Piel, F. B., Pope, D., Rahimi, K., Rodriguez, A., Scarborough, P., Schumacher, A. E., Shiue, I., Smeeth, L., Tedstone, A., Valabhji, J., Williams, H. C., Wolfe, C. D. A., Woolf, A. D., & Davis, A. C. J.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
386
Issue
10010
Pages
2257-2274
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2097819223
Cited by
345
References
16
FWCI
66.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00195-6
The paper
Newton, J. N., Briggs, A. D. M., Murray, C. J. L., Dicker, D., Foreman, K. J., Wang, H., Naghavi, M., Forouzanfar, M. H., Ohno, S. L., Barber, R. M., Vos, T., Stanaway, J. D., Schmidt, J. C., Hughes, A. J., Fay, D. F. J., Ecob, R., Gresser, C., McKee, M., Rutter, H., . . . Davis, A. C. J. (2015). Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00195-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.