Cited by 11Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The relationship between attention and avoidance coping in anorexia nervosa: functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Open access
Noda, Tomomi, Isobe, Masanori, Ueda, Keita, Aso, Toshihiko, Murao, Ema, Kawabata, Michiko, Noma, Shun'ichi, Murai, Toshiya·2021·BJPsych Open

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated attentional control difficulties and high avoidance coping in patients with anorexia nervosa. Attention is a critical coping resource because it enables individuals to demonstrate self-control and complete goal-directed behaviours. Aims: We aimed to examine whether attentional control difficulty is related to high avoidance coping, and investigate the neural underpinnings of attentional control difficulties in individuals with anorexia nervosa. Method: Twenty-three patients with anorexia nervosa and 17 healthy controls completed questionnaires that assessed attention and coping, and underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a go/no-go task. Results: Patients with anorexia nervosa showed weaker attentional control, higher omission error rates and higher avoidance coping compared with healthy controls. Attentional control difficulty was associated with higher avoidance coping in both groups. Functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis showed less deactivation in regions representing internal mental processing, such as the praecuneus, cuneus and left lingual gyrus, during the no-go condition. Moreover, weakened deactivation of the left lingual gyrus was associated with higher commission error rate in the anorexia nervosa group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that patients with anorexia nervosa may have difficulty in maintaining attention to external ongoing events because of disturbance from internal self-related thought, and support the notion that attentional control difficulties underlie the frequent use of avoidance coping in anorexia nervosa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2021.963

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus are key nodes of the default mode network, which represents self-referential processing and autobiographical memory.

    “The PCC and precuneus are considered to be key nodes of the DMN, which represents self-referential processing and autobiographical memory.9”

    From Neural correlates of a mindfulness-based intervention in anorexia nervosa (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion (page not provided) calls the precuneus a functional core of the default mode network and associates it with self-referential processing. It does not identify the posterior cingulate cortex as a key node or say that the network represents autobiographical memory. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Otsuka Y. The COPE inventory: a theoretically based coping questionnaire. Hiroshima Psychol Res 2008; 8: 121–8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noda, T., Isobe, M., Ueda, K., Aso, T., Murao, E., Kawabata, M., Noma, S., & Murai, T.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (JP)
Corresponding author
Noda, Tomomi
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2021-07
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e130-e130
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3181646671
Cited by
11
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K09480, 19K17088, 19J40242, 23K21395, 15K09864, 18J14667, JP16H06395,, JP16H06397)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, attentional control, avoidance coping, go/no-go task, neural deactivation, cuneus, omission errors, commission errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review