The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The subjective assessment of normal sleep patterns
Abstract
“When we consider the immense human significance of sleep, the absolute necessity for us to spend a considerable part of our lives in abject mental annihilation, it is remarkable how little we know about it. …” In these words, Sir John Eccles introduced the recently published Ciba Foundation Symposium on “The Nature of Sleep” (3), in which are described many of the advances which have been made in recent years in our attempts to understand the phenomena which are involved in the state of sleep. In one of the papers included in this Symposium, Bremer (2) reviews the work which has been reported since 1954 on the neurophysiological mechanisms involved in sleep. The relationship of dreaming to the depth of sleep has been investigated by such workers as Kleitman (5), Dement (4) and Wolpert (11). These studies have been made possible by the application of modern techniques of measuring mental activity. The use of electroencephalographic methods has allowed an approximate classification of the different levels of sleep which enables different workers to adopt a standard frame of reference. Measurements of rapid eye movements and of changes in muscle potential during sleep have provided more objective methods of assessing dream activity. Other recent studies have attempted to make an objective assessment of the physical and mental effects of sleep deprivation (Morris et al., 7, Bliss et al., 1, Murray et al., 8, Wilkinson, 9, Williams et al., 10).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dement, W., & Kleitman, N. (1957) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(57)90088-3 · Cited by 1,876
Cited by
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · Cited by 35,234
Aitken, R. C. B. (1969) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591576906201005 · Cited by 1,539
Primary fibromyalgia (fibrositis): Clinical study of 50 patients with matched normal controls
Yunus, M., Masi, A. T., Calabro, J. J., Miller, K. A., & Feigenbaum, S. L. (1981) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/0049-0172(81)90096-2 · Cited by 910
Ten Putative Contributors to the Obesity Epidemic
McAllister, E. J., Dhurandhar, N. V., Keith, S. W., Aronne, L. J., Barger, J., Baskin, M., Benca, R. M., Biggio, J., Boggiano, M. M., Eisenmann, J. C., et al. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408390903372599 · Cited by 710
Duffy, J. F., Zitting, K.-M., & Chinoy, E. D. (2015) · Sleep Medicine Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.jsmc.2015.08.002 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- McGhie, A., & Russell, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Mental Science
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1962-09
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 456
- Pages
- 642-654
- ISSN
- 0368-315X (ISSN-L)
- 2514-9946
- OpenAlex
- W2025433746
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The subjective assessment of normal sleep patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.108.456.642
- The paper
- McGhie, A., & Russell, S. M. (1962). The subjective assessment of normal sleep patterns. Journal of Mental Science. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.108.456.642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.