Cited by 64Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Education and ValidationPsychological Testing and Assessment

Comprehension and motivation in responses to a psychiatric screening instrument validity of the SRQ in ethiopia

Kortmann, Frank, Ten Horn, Sineke·1988·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ), a psychiatric-case-finding instrument designed by the WHO for developing countries, was tested in Ethiopia. It was submitted to 40 patients attending a psychiatric clinic, 30 at a somatic clinic, and 40 subjects not attending a clinic. Forty per cent of the yes-answers were rated as invalid. The concept-invalidity contributed mainly to the rather poor criterion-validity of the SRQ. In addition, clinic patients seemed to heighten the number of yes-answers to express their need for help. The SRQ measured not only psychiatric complaints but also illness behaviour, even without the presence of any illness. This is a substantial disadvantage if the SRQ is applied to detect the psychiatric cases in the primary-care facilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.153.1.95

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Purposive sampling was conducted based on gender, age, area of residence, and level of mental distress, as indicated by scores on the culturally validated Self-Reporting Questionnaire, 20-item version.

    “For this qualitative study, purposive sampling was conducted based on gender, age, area of residence, and level of mental distress, as indicated by scores on the culturally validated Self-Reporting Questionnaire, 20-item version [33–36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kortmann, F., & Ten Horn, S.
Affiliations
Wuhan Wudong Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Kortmann, Frank
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1988-07
Volume
153
Issue
1
Pages
95-101
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2002350190
Cited by
64
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Self-Reporting Questionnaire, mental health screening, validity, criterion validity, illness behavior, help-seeking, primary care, Ethiopia
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Ethiopia, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review