Cited by 147Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The Factor Structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30): A Reliability Study on 6317 Community Residents

Huppert, Felicia A., Walters, D. E., Day, N., Elliott, B. Jane·1989·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

An individual's responses to Goldberg's 30-item General Health Questionnaire are usually represented as a single score which provides a measure of the number of psychiatric symptoms reported. No account is taken of the nature of the symptoms. Factor analyses of the GHQ-30 were undertaken in ten randomly selected samples of 600 adults each, and also on 12 age-sex groupings covering the age range 18-98. The results indicate an impressive degree of consistency of the factor structure, and the identification of five distinct factors corresponding to anxiety, feelings of incompetence, depression, difficulty in coping, and social dysfunction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.155.2.178

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In comparison with normative data from a U.K. population, subjects with Addison's disease showed a higher total GHQ-30 score, denoting worse mental health status at baseline, particularly on the anxiety and self-esteem subscales.

    “In comparison with normative data from a U.K. population (39), subjects with Addison's disease showed a higher total GHQ-30 score, denoting worse mental health status at baseline, particularly on the anxiety and self-esteem subscales (Table 5).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huppert, F. A., Walters, D. E., Day, N., & Elliott, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Huppert, Felicia A.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1989-08
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
178-185
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2081023809
Cited by
147
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-30, factor structure, psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, depression, social dysfunction, coping difficulties, age and sex differences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review